Upgrades Under Coordinated System Plan Sample Clauses

Upgrades Under Coordinated System Plan. Cost responsibility for the transmission upgrades identified in the Coordinated System Plan to resolve thermal or reactive system constraints related to reliability criteria or operational or economic system performance will be assigned to the Parties equitably, based on the nature of the constraint being resolved. The JPC will develop procedures for evaluating, on a case-by-case basis, the relative contribution of the Party’s systems to the constraint and the relative benefits derived by the parties by the resolution of the constraint. The JPC will propose an allocation of costs for such transmission system upgrades. The proposed allocation of costs will be reviewed with the IPSAC and the appropriate multi-state entities. Stakeholder input will be taken into consideration by the JPC in arriving at a consensus allocation of costs. Upgrade proposals and cost allocations are subject to the approval process of both Parties for transmission upgrades. Each Party’s allocation and the recovery of the costs of such Network Upgrades shall be consistent with the terms and conditions of its own OATT, as it may be modified from time to time pursuant to the rights of various parties under the Federal Power Act.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Upgrades Under Coordinated System Plan. Cost responsibility for the transmission upgrades identified in the Coordinated System Plan to resolve thermal or reactive system constraints related to reliability criteria or operational or economic system performance will be assigned to the Parties equitably, based on the nature of the constraint being resolved. Issued by: Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx, President and CEO, Midwest ISO Effective: December 1, 2004 Xxxxxxxx X. Xxxxx, President and CEO, Southwest Power Pool, Inc. Issued on: December 1, 2004 Filed to comply with order of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Docket No. ER04-1096-000, issued October 01, 2004, 109 FERC ¶ 61,008 (2004). The JPC will develop procedures for evaluating, on a case-by-case basis, the relative contribution of the Party’s systems to the constraint and the relative benefits derived by the parties by the resolution of the constraint. The JPC will propose an allocation of costs for such transmission system upgrades. The proposed allocation of costs will be reviewed with the IPSAC and the appropriate multi-state entities. Stakeholder input will be taken into consideration by the JPC in arriving at a consensus allocation of costs. Upgrade proposals and cost allocations are subject to the approval process of both Parties for transmission upgrades. Each Party’s allocation and the recovery of the costs of such Network Upgrades shall be consistent with the terms and conditions of its own OATT, as it may be modified from time to time pursuant to the rights of various parties under the Federal Power Act.

Related to Upgrades Under Coordinated System Plan

  • Program Coordinator An individual designated by the program director to assist the program director in managing Match activities.

  • Order Coordination and Order Coordination-Time Specific 2.1.9.1 “Order Coordination” (OC) allows BellSouth and Global Connection to coordinate the installation of the SL2 Loops, Unbundled Digital Loops (UDL) and other Loops where OC may be purchased as an option, to Global Connection’s facilities to limit end user service outage. OC is available when the Loop is provisioned over an existing circuit that is currently providing service to the end user. OC for physical conversions will be scheduled at BellSouth’s discretion during normal working hours on the committed due date. OC shall be provided in accordance with the chart set forth below.

  • Project Coordination The Engineer shall coordinate all subconsultant activity to include quality and consistency of deliverables and administration of the invoices and monthly progress reports. The Engineer shall coordinate with necessary local entities.

  • Project Coordinator 3. Within 14 days of the effective date of this Consent Agreement, DTSC and Respondent shall each designate a Project Coordinator and shall notify each other in writing of the Project Coordinator selected. Each Project Coordinator shall be responsible for overseeing the implementation of this Consent Agreement and for designating a person to act in his/her absence. All communications between Respondent and DTSC, and all documents, report approvals, and other correspondence concerning the activities performed pursuant to this Consent Agreement shall be directed through the Project Coordinators. Each party may change its Project Coordinator with at least seven days prior written notice. WORK TO BE PERFORMED

  • Project Team To accomplish Owner’s objectives, Owner intends to employ a team concept in connection with the construction of the Project. The basic roles and general responsibilities of team members are set forth in general terms below but are more fully set forth in the Design Professional Contract with respect to the Design Professional, in the Program Management Agreement with any Program Manager, and in this Contract with respect to the Contractor.

  • CAISO Scheduling Coordinator Charge The CAISO Scheduling Coordinator Charge for each Unit shall be the product of $0.31 and the Unit’s Billable MWh for the Billing Month.

  • Project Steering Committee (a) The Recipient shall establish and maintain at all times until the completion of the Project, the Project Steering Committee with a composition, mandate and resources satisfactory to the Association.

  • Service Level Expectations Without limiting any other requirements of the Agreement, the Service Provider shall meet or exceed the following standards, policies, and guidelines:

  • Innovative/Flexible Scheduling Where the Hospital and the Union agree, arrangements regarding Innovative Scheduling/Flexible Scheduling may be entered into between the parties on a local level. The model agreement with respect to such scheduling arrangements is set out below: MODEL AGREEMENT WITH RESPECT TO INNOVATIVE SCHEDULING/FLEXIBLE SCHEDULING MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Between: The Hospital - And: The Ontario Public Service Employees Union (and its Local ) This Model Agreement shall be part of the Collective Agreement between the parties herein, and shall apply to the employees described in Article 1 of the Model Agreement.

  • Innovative Scheduling Schedules which are inconsistent with the Collective Agreement provisions may be developed in order to improve quality of working life, support continuity of resident care, ensure adequate staffing resources, and support cost-efficiency. The parties agree that such innovative schedules may be determined locally by the Home and the Union subject to the following principles:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.