Validation of completeness Sample Clauses

Validation of completeness. It details the new process on reporting rowcount in entity type delivery. Updated the hyperlinks to the webpage of DNB that contains the AnaCredit information.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Validation of completeness. The metadata checksum file is part of the files to be submitted. For each entity type, the required type of checksum is listed. For now, only, a logical row count is requested for each entity type that is logically part of the reporting requirement. The entity types that are part of the reference data do not require a rowcount. All entity types whose rowcount is to be reported is marked with a rowcount reporting indicator value set to “entity type with reported rowcount”. This rowcount 12 Sending in a new AnaCredit data exchange for the same obligation (reporting ID, reporting reference date, data delivery code) while the status of the previous delivery is Received, will result in a validation error of the newly submitted data exchange. 13 In time, these signalling rules are meant to be changed to ‘blocking’. 14 These are signalling rules that require data outside the scope of the data delivery set. indicates the number of instances of an entity type that is appropriate to this entity type in accordance with the logical data model. Please note that this concerns the entity types in the logical data model where the attribute ‘reporting reference date’ is part of the primary key, and not only those entity types in the physical data deliveries. The logical data model also requires a row count and checksum for those entity types that do not have a corresponding .csv file to be delivered. 2.7.6.1 Example of a check on a physical delivery
Validation of completeness. The metadata checksum file is part of the files to be submitted. For each entity type, the required type of checksum is listed. For now, only, a logical row count is requested for each entity type that is logically part of the reporting requirement. The entity types that are part of the reference data do not require a rowcount. All entity types whose rowcount is to be reported is marked with a rowcount reporting indicator value set to “entity type with reported rowcount”12. This rowcount indicates the number of instances of an entity type that is appropriate to this entity type in accordance with the logical data model. Please note that this concerns the entity types in the logical data model where the attribute ‘reporting reference date’ is part of the primary key, and not only those entity types in the physical data deliveries. The logical data model also requires a row count and checksum for those entity types that do not have a corresponding .csv file to be delivered. 2.6.6.1 Example of a check on a physical delivery E.g. the reporting agent must report on exactly 100,000 instruments. The instrument.csv file contains 100,000 rows, excluding the header. The row count for the logical entity is 100,000. The entity type delivery lists a row count of 100,000 for the "instrument" entity type. DNB checks that 100000 = 100000 and accepts the delivery. 2.6.6.2 Example of a check on a logical delivery The entity type "instrument not past due" does not have its own specific features or relations, and therefore does not require physical delivery. However, the logical checksum of all not past due instruments must be delivered. For example, the reporting agent must report on exactly 100,000 instruments (with 100,000 financial data), 10,000 of which are instrument past due and 90,000 are instrument not past due (100,000-10,000). These files must be reported: 1. instrument.csv with 100,000 records 2. financial_data.csv with 100,000 records 3. instrument_past_due.csv with 10,000 records These records must be reported in the entity type delivery: Instrument 100,000 financial data 100,000 instrument past due 10,000 instrument not past due 90,000 DNB checks that instrument.csv contains 100,000 rows, that financial_data.csv contains 100,000 rows, that instrument_past_due contains 10,000 rows and that 90,000 rows in instrument.csv logically consist of instruments not past due. 12 The rowcount reporting indicator for the entity types can be found in the ‘RRE business terms’,...
Validation of completeness. The metadata checksum file is part of the files to be submitted. For each entity type, the required type of checksum is listed. For now, no checksum is requested, only, a logical row count is requested for each entity type. This count indicates the number of instances of an entity type that is appropriate to this entity type in accordance with the logical data model. Please note that this concerns the entities in the logical data model and not only those in the physical data deliveries: the logical data model also requires a row count and checksum for those entity types that do not have a corresponding .csv file to be delivered. 2.6.6.1 Example of a check on a physical delivery E.g. the bank must deliver exactly 100,000 bank accounts. The bank_account.csv file contains 100,000 rows. The row count for the logical entity is 100,000. The entity type delivery lists a row count of 100,000 for the "bank account" entity type. DNB checks that 100000 = 100000 and accepts the delivery. 2.6.6.2 Example of a check on a logical delivery The entity types "non blocked bank account" and “blocked bank account” do not have their own specific features, and therefore do not require physical delivery. However, the logical checksum and/or rowcount of “non blocked bank account” and “blocked bank account” must be delivered. For example, the bank must deliver exactly 100,000 bank accounts, 1,500 of which are blocked bank accounts and 98,500 are non blocked bank accounts (100,000-1,500). Only one file must be reported: 1. bank_account.csv with 100,000 records Altough, three records must be reported in the entity type delivery: Bank account 100,000 Blocked bank account 1,500 Non blocked bank account 98,500 DNB checks if bank_account.csv contains 100,000 rows and if 1,500 rows and 98,500 rows in bank_account.csv logically consist of respectively blocked bank accounts and non blocked bank accounts. An example of the entity_type_delivery content can be found in Apendix C. 2.6.6.3 Check on primary key The LDM has entity types that allow DNB to ask for checks on combinations of attributes. This mechanism is primarily meant to check the integrity of primary keys of the entity types in the logical data model. Currently, no checks of these types are foreseen, since DNB will rely instead on the hashing of the csv files themselves, in combination of the checks on the referential integrity as specified in the logical data model. This entails that the file attribute_combination_delivery.csv mus...
Validation of completeness. ‌ The metadata checksum file is part of the files to be submitted. For each entity type, the required type of checksum is listed. For now, no checksum is requested, only, a logical row count is requested for each entity type. This count indicates the number of instances of an entity type that is appropriate for this entity type in accordance with the logical data model. Please note that this concerns all entities in the logical data model including reference data and entity types like “entity type delivery” and not only those in the physical data deliveries: the logical data model also requires a row count and checksum for those entity types that do not have a corresponding .csv file to be delivered. 2.6.6.1 Example of a check on a physical delivery
Validation of completeness. The metadata checksum file is part of the files to be submitted. For each entity type, the required type of checksum is listed. For now, no checksum is requested, only, a logical row count is 12 Sending in a new AnaCredit data exchange for the same obligation (reporting ID, reporting reference date, datadelivery code) while the status of the previous delivery is Received, will result in a validation error of the newly submitted data exchange. 13 In time, these signalling rules are meant to be changed to ‘blocking’. 14 These are signalling rules that require data outside the scope of the data delivery set. requested for each entity type. This count indicates the number of instances of an entity type that is appropriate to this entity type in accordance with the logical data model. Please note that this concerns the entities in the logical data model and not only those in the physical data deliveries: the logical data model also requires a row count and checksum for those entity types that do not have a corresponding .csv file to be delivered. 2.7.6.1 Example of a check on a physical delivery
Validation of completeness. ‌ The metadata checksum file is part of the files to be submitted. For each entity type, the required type of checksum is listed. For now, no checksum is requested, only, a logical row count is requested for each entity type. This count indicates the number of instances of an entity type that is appropriate to this entity type in accordance with the logical data model.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Validation of completeness

  • Completeness This Grant Contract is complete and contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the subject matter contained herein, including all the terms and conditions of the parties’ agreement. This Grant Contract supersedes any and all prior understandings, representations, negotiations, and agreements between the parties relating hereto, whether written or oral.

  • Certification of Compliance San Diego Municipal Code section 22.4225 requires each Bidder to fill out and file a living wage certification with the Living Wage Program Manager within thirty (30) days of Award of the Contract.

  • Response/Compliance with Audit or Inspection Findings A. Grantee must act to ensure its and its Subcontractors’ compliance with all corrections necessary to address any finding of noncompliance with any law, regulation, audit requirement, or generally accepted accounting principle, or any other deficiency identified in any audit, review, inspection or investigation of the Grant Agreement and the services and Deliverables provided. Any such correction will be at Grantee’s or its Subcontractor's sole expense. Whether Xxxxxxx's action corrects the noncompliance shall be solely the decision of the System Agency. B. As part of the services, Grantee must provide to HHS upon request a copy of those portions of Grantee's and its Subcontractors' internal audit reports relating to the services and Deliverables provided to the State under the Grant Agreement. C. Grantee shall include the requirement to provide to System Agency (and any of its duly authorized federal, state, or local authorities) internal audit reports related to this Grant Agreement in any Subcontract it awards. Upon request by System Agency, Grantee shall enforce this requirement against its Subcontractor. Further, Grantee shall include in any Subcontract it awards a requirement that all Subcontractor Subcontracts must also include these provisions.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!