VISIBILITY IMPROVEMENT DETERMINATION Sample Clauses

VISIBILITY IMPROVEMENT DETERMINATION. The fifth of five factors that must be considered for a BART determination analysis, as required by a 40 CFR part 51-Appendix Y, is the degree of Class I area visibility improvement that would result from the installation of the various options for control technology. This factor was evaluated for the Muskogee Generating Station by using an EPA-approved dispersion modeling system (CALPUFF) to predict the change in Class I area visibility. The Division had previously determined that the Muskogee Generating Station was subject to BART based on the results of initial screening modeling that was conducted using current (baseline) emissions from the facility. The screening modeling, as well as more refined modeling conducted by the applicant, is described in detail below. Wichita Mountain Wildlife Refuge, Caney Creek, Upper Buffalo and Hercules Glade are the closest Class I areas to the Muskogee Generating Station, as shown in Figure 1 below. Only those Class I areas most likely to be impacted by the Muskogee Generating Station were modeled, as determined by source/Class I area locations, distances to each Class I area, and professional judgment considering meteorological and terrain factors. It can be reasonably assumed that areas at greater distances and .in directions of less frequent plume transport will OG&E Muskogee Generating Station BART Review January 15, 2010 experience lower impacts than those predicted for the four modeled areas. IMAGE NOT SHOWN Figure 1: Plot of Facility location in relation to nearest Class I areas Because of the results of the applicants screening modeling for the Muskogee Generating Station, OG&E was required to conduct a refined BART analysis that included CALPUFF visibility modeling for the facility. The modeling approach followed the requirements described in the Division's BART modeling protocol, CENRAP BART Modeling Guidelines (Alpine Geophysics, December 2005) with refinements detailed the applicants CALMET modeling protocol, CALMET Data Processing Protocol (Trinity Consultants, January 2008) Predicted visibility impacts from the Muskogee Generating Station were determined with the EPA CALPUFF modeling system, which is the EPA-preferred modeling system for long-range transport. As described in the EPA Guideline on Air Quality Models (Appendix W of 40 CFR Part 51), long-range transport is defined as modeling with source-receptor distances greater than 50 km. Because all modeled areas are located more than 50 km from the sou...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to VISIBILITY IMPROVEMENT DETERMINATION

  • Quality Improvement The Parties must develop QI activities specifically for the oversight of the requirements of this MOU, including, without limitation, any applicable performance measures and QI initiatives, including those to prevent duplication of services, as well as reports that track referrals, Member engagement, and service utilization. Such QI activities must include processes to monitor the extent to which Members are able to access mental health services across SMHS and NSMHS, and Covered Service utilization. The Parties must document these QI activities in policies and procedures.

  • School Improvement The parties do hereby mutually agree that the school improvement process currently in effect will continue. Any plan developed by the committees shall not be in conflict with the master agreement or board policy.

  • Needs Improvement the Educator’s performance on a standard or overall is below the requirements of a standard or overall, but is not considered to be unsatisfactory at this time. Improvement is necessary and expected.

  • Constructability Review Prepare detailed interdisciplinary constructability review within Fourteen (14) days of receipt of the plans from the District that: 10.1.2.1.6.1 Ensures construction documents are well coordinated and reviewed for errors; 10.1.2.1.6.2 Identifies to the extent known, construction deficiencies and areas of concern; 10.1.2.1.6.3 Back-checks design drawings for inclusion of modifications; and 10.1.2.1.6.4 Provides the District with written confirmation that: 10.1.2.1.6.4.1 Requirements noted in the design documents prepared for the Project are consistent with and conform to the District's Project requirements and design standards. 10.1.2.1.6.4.2 Various components have been coordinated and are consistent with each other so as to minimize conflicts within or between components of the design documents.

  • CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT 3.1 The Supplier shall adopt a policy of continuous improvement in relation to the Services pursuant to which it will regularly review with the Authority the Services and the manner in which it is providing the Services with a view to reducing the Authority's costs (including the Framework Prices), the costs of Contracting Bodies and/or improving the quality and efficiency of the Services. The Supplier and the Authority will provide to each other any information which may be relevant to assisting the objectives of continuous improvement and in particular reducing costs.

  • PROFESSIONAL IMPROVEMENT The parties’ support the principle of continuing training of teachers, participation by teachers in professional organizations in the areas of their specialization, leaves for work on advanced degrees or special studies, foreign travel and participation in community educational projects.

  • The Performance Improvement Process (a) The Performance Improvement Process will focus on the risks of non- performance and problem-solving. It may include one or more of the following actions: (1) a requirement that the HSP develop and implement an improvement plan that is acceptable to the LHIN; (2) the conduct of a Review; (3) a revision and amendment of the HSP’s obligations; and (4) an in-year, or year end, adjustment to the Funding, among other possible means of responding to the Performance Factor or improving performance. (b) Any performance improvement process begun under a prior service accountability agreement that was not completed under the prior agreement will continue under this Agreement. Any performance improvement required by a LHIN under a prior service accountability agreement will be deemed to be a requirement of this Agreement until fulfilled or waived by the LHIN.

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK

  • Performance Improvement Plan timely and accurate completion of key actions due within the reporting period 100 percent The Supplier will design and develop an improvement plan and agree milestones and deliverables with the Authority 3.2 The Authority may from time to time make changes to the KPIs measured as set out in paragraph 3.1 above and shall issue a replacement version to the Supplier. The Authority shall give notice In Writing of any such change to the KPIs measured and shall specify the date from which the replacement KPIs must be used for future reports. Such date shall be at least thirty (30) calendar days following the date of the notice to the Supplier.

  • Removal of Improvements All items of Landlord’s construction, all heating, ventilating and air conditioning equipment and all permanent improvements installed by Landlord shall be the property of Landlord and shall not be removed from the Leased Premises without the prior written consent of Landlord. All trade fixtures, furniture, furnishings and signs installed in the Leased Premises by Xxxxxx and paid for by Tenant shall remain the property of Tenant, and may be removed upon the expiration of the Term of this Lease, provided that: i. Tenant shall have fully performed all of the covenants, conditions and provisions to be performed by Tenant under this Lease; and ii. Tenant repairs any damage to the Leased Premises or the Building caused by such removal and restores the Leased Premises to the condition that existed on the commencement date of this Lease, reasonable wear and tear excepted. If Tenant fails to remove any such items from the Leased Premises within thirty (30) days after the expiration or earlier termination of this Lease, all such trade fixtures, furniture, furnishings and signs shall, at Landlord’s options, become the property of Landlord, unless Landlord elects to require their removal, in which case Tenant shall promptly remove the same and restore the Leased Premises to its prior condition. If Tenant fails to promptly remove the same, Landlord may remove and store such items at the expense of Tenant.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!