Wastewater Ownership Options and Considerations Sample Clauses

Wastewater Ownership Options and Considerations. Ownership of wastewater systems in Suffolk County, New York can take several forms that offer differing characteristics. The form of ownership of the future wastewater facilities should be considered as soon as possible in the planning process so that the actions taken to control and implement new facilities and upgrade the existing facilities fulfill the operating protocol and financial goals of the future owner. Whereas, these objectives will be similar with regards to the environmental attributes that are driven by established regulations, they could differ with regards to the details of the facility functions and methods of financing. It is important to match the characteristics of the owning and servicing entities with the required skills and operating capabilities of the solutions selected. Wastewater treatment systems serving the public sector in New York State can be owned by a combination of public, private, for-profit and nonprofit entities as is typically the case in most states. The public ownership options include governmental jurisdictions (city, town, county, etc) as well as quasi-public entities such as authorities which can be created for a singular or multipurpose function such as wastewater, stormwater, solid waste, etc. This section of the report is not intended to be a comprehensive legal analysis of each option, which requires review of local, inter-local and County historical records and agreements, but rather this is intended to serve as an overview of the benefits and drawbacks of different options that are generally available. There are a number of variables that provide benefits and drawbacks to each ownership model and the best outcome is one the meets everyone’s needs for safe, affordable and dependable service in the most efficient and lowest risk manner. In recent times, blending public and private risk sharing models together is becoming more popular as a means of achieving that objective, but there are restrictions and specific requirements for such shared risk models that vary by State. New York State has expanded the opportunity to utilize certain aspects of what is typically referred to as “Public Private Partnerships” or “P3’s” but not without limitations. It appears that the “public finance - private execution” models that utilize long term at-risk Design-Build-Operate services would be allowable by State law applicable to Suffolk County and may provide a desired model for wastewater services discussed in this study. F...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Wastewater Ownership Options and Considerations

  • General Considerations a. All reports, drawings, designs, specifications, notebooks, computations, details, and calculation documents prepared by Vendor and presented to the Board pursuant to this Agreement are and remain the property of the Board as instruments of service.

  • Use of Training Units and Consulting Units Training Units and Consulting Units: (a) are non-refundable, (b) are non-transferable, (c) may not be redeemed for cash or credit, (d) must be used as whole credits, (e) cannot be combined with any other discount, special offer or coupon and (f) can be redeemed only in the same geographic region and currency as purchased. United States Government end users (or resellers acting on behalf of the United States Government) may not purchase Training Units or Consulting Units.

  • Special Considerations Special considerations in determining allowability of compensation will be given to any change in a non-Federal entity's compensation policy resulting in a substantial increase in its employees' level of compensation (particularly when the change was concurrent with an increase in the ratio of Federal awards to other activities) or any change in the treatment of allowability of specific types of compensation due to changes in Federal policy.

  • Environmental Considerations A. Company, its officers, agents, servants, employees, invitees, independent contractors, successors, and assigns will not discharge or spill any Hazardous Substance, as defined herein, into any component of the storm drainage system or onto any paved or unpaved area within the boundaries of the Premises. In addition, Company will not discharge or spill any Hazardous Substance into any component of the sanitary sewer system without first neutralizing or treating same as required by applicable anti-pollution laws or ordinances, in a manner satisfactory to Authority and other public bodies, federal, state, or local, having jurisdiction over or responsibility for the prevention of pollution of canals, streams, rivers, and other bodies of water. Company’s discharge, spill or introduction of any Hazardous Substance onto the Premises or into any component of Authority’s sanitary or storm drainage systems will, if not remedied by Company with all due dispatch, at the sole discretion of Authority, be deemed a default and cause for termination of this Agreement by Authority, subject to notice and cure. Such termination will not relieve Company of or from liability for such discharge or spill.

  • MEMO OF CONSIDERATION RECEIVED on the day month and year first above written of and from the within named Purchasers the within mentioned sum of Rs. /- (Rupees only)paid as and by way of full consideration in terms of these presents. Sl. No. Details Amount (Rs) 1 By cheque no. dated 2 By cheque no. dated 3 By cheque no. dated 4 By cheque no. dated 5 By cheque no. dated 6 TDS ( ) 7 By cheque no. dated TOTAL (RUPEES ONLY) WITNESSES:

  • Treatment of Passthru Payments and Gross Proceeds The Parties are committed to work together, along with Partner Jurisdictions, to develop a practical and effective alternative approach to achieve the policy objectives of foreign passthru payment and gross proceeds withholding that minimizes burden.

  • Ethical Considerations The study will be conducted in accordance with ethical principles founded in the Declaration of Helsinki. The Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) will review all appropriate study documentation in order to safeguard the rights, safety and well-being of the subjects. The study can only be conducted at study sites where IRB/IEC approval has been obtained. The protocol, informed consent form, Investigator’s Brochure, advertisements (if applicable), and all other forms of information given to subjects will be provided to the IRB/IEC by the Investigator. In addition, reports on the progress of the study will be submitted to the IRB/IEC by the Investigator at the appropriate intervals.

  • OPTION CONSIDERATION As consideration for this Option to Purchase Agreement, the Buyer/ Tenant shall pay the Seller/Landlord a non-refundable fee of Dollars ($ ), receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by the Seller/Landlord. This amount shall be credited to the purchase price at closing if the Buyer/Tenant timely exercises the option to purchase, provided that the Buyer/Tenant: (a) is not in default of the Lease Agreement, and (b) closes the conveyance of the Property. The Seller/Landlord shall not refund the fee if the Buyer/Tenant defaults in the Lease Agreement, fails to close the conveyance, or otherwise does not exercise the option to purchase.

  • Requirements Pertaining Only to Federal Grants and Subrecipient Agreements If this Agreement is a grant that is funded in whole or in part by Federal funds:

  • RISK CONSIDERATION There are no significant risks associated with the recommendations contained within this report. This application may be considered under existing MPS policies. Community Council has the discretion to make decisions that are consistent with the MPS, and such decisions may be appealed to the N.S. Utility and Review Board. Information concerning risks and other implications of adopting the proposed development agreement are contained within the Discussion section of this report. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS No environmental implications are identified.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.