Work package 2 – TANDEM regions Sample Clauses

Work package 2 – TANDEM regions. The cooperation under this work package started in January 2006 and ended in December 2007. Leading partner was the University of Zielona Gora (UNZG), Poland. As described in the 2nd interim report (March 2007), the process of implementation started with the draft of a module for assessment (to be consulted under D12) of a TANDEM region and selection of the partner, developed by the UNZG team. The model experience of partnership between the UNGZ and an NGO from the Polish region (Podkarpackie) at the Eastern border to Ukraine was used as point of departure for the whole process of involvement of tandem regions. The main task of the cooperation in 2006 was the field analysis, establishment of contacts and the building up of partnership modalities. The selected TANDEM partner regions were presented in the 2nd interim report; therefore they will be only listed: • Tandem region 1 (network partner of MRI) – West Ukraine, district of Lviv, with main partner SALUS Foundation (NGO); • Tandem region 2 (MRII) – South-East Poland, Podkarpackie Voivodship, border to Ukraine, with main partner POMOST (NGO); • Tandem region 3 (MRIII) – Eastern Slovakia, regions of Košice and Prešov, border to Ukraine, with main partner RISEN (NGO); • Tandem region 4 (MRIV) – North-west Croatia, city of Rijeka, border to Slovenia and Italy, main partner Rijeka Healthy City (NGO) The partner activities in 2007 had a more complex focus on the transfer of experience from the old BORDERNET model regions to the new tandem regions and on the draft of joint plans for expert seminars and trainings. In 2007 several tandem region meetings were conducted, one of them (Košice) with participation of the SPI team: • TR1 - Lviv, Ukraine –June 2007 • TR2 – Warsaw, Poland – October 2007 (meeting between UNZG and tandem partner POMOST) • TR 3 - Košice, Eastern Slovakia – February 2007 • TR4 - Rijeka, Croatia – February 2007 A more detailed description of the tandem activities can be seen in the report on WP 2 (see D12), developed by the leading partner on this component,UNZG. Additionally, contacts were re-established by the SPI team in 2007 to the Baltic region and to Estonia in particular. The border to Russia was chosen as partner region. The Tandem partner is the NGO AIDS information and Support centre in Tallinn, which has a vast experience in HIV prevention and social support services for highly vulnerable groups, e.g. migrant sex workers and IDUs. New priority for the activities under BORDERNET wil...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Work package 2 – TANDEM regions

  • Loop Provisioning Involving IDLC 2.16.1 Where TWTC has requested an Unbundled Loop and AT&T uses IDLC systems to provide the local service to the customer and AT&T has a suitable alternate facility available, AT&T will make such alternative facilities available to TWTC. If a suitable alternative facility is not available, then to the extent it is technically feasible, AT&T will implement one of the following alternative arrangements for TWTC (e.g., hairpinning):

  • Power Factor Design Criteria Developer shall design the Large Generating Facility to maintain an effective power delivery at demonstrated maximum net capability at the Point of Interconnection at a power factor within the range established by the Connecting Transmission Owner on a comparable basis, until NYISO has established different requirements that apply to all generators in the New York Control Area on a comparable basis. The Developer shall design and maintain the plant auxiliary systems to operate safely throughout the entire real and reactive power design range. The Connecting Transmission Owner shall not unreasonably restrict or condition the reactive power production or absorption of the Large Generating Facility in accordance with Good Utility Practice.

  • Multi-year Planning Targets Schedule A may reflect an allocation for the first Funding Year of this Agreement as well as planning targets for up to two additional years, consistent with the term of this Agreement. In such an event, the HSP acknowledges that if it is provided with planning targets, these targets:

  • Power Factor Design Criteria (Reactive Power A wind generating plant shall maintain a power factor within the range of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging, measured at the Point of Interconnection as defined in this LGIA, if the ISO’s System Reliability Impact Study shows that such a requirement is necessary to ensure safety or reliability. The power factor range standards can be met using, for example without limitation, power electronics designed to supply this level of reactive capability (taking into account any limitations due to voltage level, real power output, etc.) or fixed and switched capacitors if agreed to by the Connecting Transmission Owner for the Transmission District to which the wind generating plant will be interconnected, or a combination of the two. The Developer shall not disable power factor equipment while the wind plant is in operation. Wind plants shall also be able to provide sufficient dynamic voltage support in lieu of the power system stabilizer and automatic voltage regulation at the generator excitation system if the System Reliability Impact Study shows this to be required for system safety or reliability.

  • Loop Provisioning Involving Integrated Digital Loop Carriers 2.6.1 Where InterGlobe has requested an Unbundled Loop and BellSouth uses IDLC systems to provide the local service to the End User and BellSouth has a suitable alternate facility available, BellSouth will make such alternative facilities available to InterGlobe. If a suitable alternative facility is not available, then to the extent it is technically feasible, BellSouth will implement one of the following alternative arrangements for InterGlobe (e.g. hairpinning):

  • MSAA Indicator Technical Specification Document This Agreement shall be interpreted with reference to the MSAA Indicator Technical Specifications document.

  • Annual Work Plans (a) The Recipient shall prepare in accordance with guidelines acceptable to the Association and furnish to the Association not later than March 31 in each calendar year, a proposed annual work plan and budget for the Project for the following fiscal year of the Recipient, of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request.

  • Four Day Work Week Schedule i. When working under the four (4) day work week schedule, Employees shall be paid at double time (2x) the regular hourly rate for all hours worked in excess of the regular ten (10) hours per day Monday through Thursday.

  • Annual Work Plan and Budget 1. The Recipient shall, not later than November 30th of each year, prepare and furnish to the Association an annual work plan and budget (“Annual Work Plan and Budget”) for the Project for the subsequent year, said Annual Work Plan and Budget of such scope and detail as the Association shall have reasonably requested.

  • TASK 1 GENERAL PROJECT TASKS PRODUCTS

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.