History of Agreement. This agreement has been drafted by the Texas Student Privacy Alliance (TXSPA). The Alliance is a collaborative group of Texas school districts that share common concerns around student and data privacy. The Texas K-12 CTO Council is the organization that sponsors the TXSPA and the TXSPA is the Texas affiliate of the national Student Data Privacy Consortium (SDPC). The SDPC works with other state alliances by helping establish common data privacy agreements unique to the jurisdiction of each state. This Texas agreement was drafted specifically for K-12 education institutions and included broad stakeholder input from Texas school districts, statewide associations such as TASB, TASA, and TASBO, and the Texas Education Agency. The purpose of this agreement is to set standards of both practice and expectations around data privacy such that all parties involved have a common understanding of expectations. This agreement also provides a mechanism (Exhibit E- General Offer of Terms) that would allow an Operator to extend the ability of other Texas school districts to be covered under the terms of the agreement should an Operator sign Exhibit E. This mechanism is intended to create efficiencies for both Operators and LEAs and generally enhance privacy practices and expectations for K-12 institutions and for companies providing services to K-12 institutions.
History of Agreement. The Original Agreement was prepared July 1, 1996 by: The Outdoor Advertising Association of Wisconsin and the Wisconsin Department of Transportation. Revisions were made in November 1997 to Parts 2.5, 3.2, 4.11, and the Outdoor Advertising Survey Sheet (Appendix). Revisions were subsequently made in June of 2002 to pages 8 & 11 (worksheets) marked obsolete; Appendix to contain most recent forms: RE1527, RE1676, RE1677, RE1678. On February 9, 2005, language and form updates were made. In November 2008, revisions were made to parts 1.1, 2.1, 2.2, 2.5 (Payment Schedule Summary Worksheet), 2.6 (Relocation Cost Schedule), 4.5, 4.8, 4.9, 4.11, and 4.12; a new section 1.6 History of Agreement was added, and parts 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 and 1.5 were renumbered. Updates to Relocation Cost Schedule were made February 2011 and again January 2013. In January 2013, current versions of each form were made a part of this updated agreement. Also in January 2013, total number of pages were reduced due to changes in font style and sizes, and removed duplicate identical draft of Payment Schedule Summary Worksheet, which is now only displayed in Appendix along with the other forms, and page numbers referenced for each part in Table of Contents have were updated. Also corrected part 4.6 referencing where platform amounts are found. Final changes were to update all references of the DOT, to read the WisDOT, and to correct the term lineal, to read linear. The original, 1996 agreement contained the following procedure for revising the agreement: “On or around the anniversary date of this Agreement, or at any time mutually agreeable to both parties, the OAAW and the WisDOT may make modifications upon mutual consent on non-cost related terms of the Agreement to expedite relocation issues as the Schedule is implemented. Cost-related terms, most importantly the scheduled costs in the Schedule shall not be modified during the term. However, in the event this agreement is extended at the end of the term, costs will be adjusted based upon annual statewide cost modifiers for similar structures from the most current Boeckh Cost Service Manual available at that time.” This provision is no longer valid as of November 1, 2008. See page 3, sec. 1.1 for November 2008 revisions to this procedure.
History of Agreement. The AAFS Executive Committee modified this Agreement to correct minor typographical errors on July 22, 2016, and it was later ratified by the AAFS Board of Directors on August 2, 2016. The AAFS Executive Committee modified this Agreement to add clause 6.3.1. approved by the AAFS Board of Directors on February 19, 2018. The AAFS Executive Committee accepted the amendments and restatement of this Agreement in its current form on January 20, 2018, and it was later ratified by the AAFS Board of Directors on February 18, 2019 (the “Effective Date of Agreement, as Amended and Restated”).
History of Agreement. The Victorian Government has a strong, productive partnership with the Municipal Association of Victoria (MAV) and local councils. The relationship between MAV and Early Childhood in particular has existed formally since 2002 (DHS Partnership Protocol). Since 2008, the relationship between all state government agencies local government agencies has been underpinned by the Victorian State Local Government Agreement (VSLGA). On 6 August 2009, the initial Partnership Agreement was signed, building on the existing mutual support and collaboration in order to improve outcomes for children, young people and their families. This version of the Partnership Agreement refreshes the 2009 version to consolidate the collaborative relationship between the Department and the MAV. It also reflects the machinery of government changes, which returned Skills Victoria and Adult, Community and Further Education to the Department on 1 January 2011.
History of Agreement. This agreement has been drafted by the Texas Student Privacy Alliance (TXSPA). The Alliance is a collaborative group of Texas school districts that share common concerns around student and data privacy. The Texas K-12 CTO Council is the organization that sponsors the TXSPA and the TXSPA is the Texas affiliate of the national Student Data Privacy Consortium (SDPC). The SDPC works with other state alliances by helping establish common data privacy agreements unique to the jurisdiction of each state. This Texas agreement was drafted specifically for K-12 education institutions and included broad stakeholder input from Texas school districts, statewide associations such as TASB, TASA, and TASBO, and the Texas Education Agency. The purpose of this agreement is to set standards of both practice and expectations around data privacy such that all parties involved have a common understanding of expectations. This agreement also provides a mechanism (Exhibit E- General Offer of Terms) that would allow an Operator to extend the ability of other Texas school districts to be covered under the terms of the agreement should an Operator sign Exhibit E. This mechanism is intended to create efficiencies for both Operators and LEAs and generally enhance privacy practices and expectations for K-12 institutions and for companies providing services to K-12 institutions. Xxxxxxx/Xxxxxxx Xxx # # 0 Xxxxxxxx Xxxx xx Xxxxxxxx # 0 Date Signed by Operator #5 Contract Title for Service Agreement Operator notates if data is collected to provide the described services. Defines the schedule of data required for the Operator to provide the services outlined in Exhibit A All Applicable Boxes Exhibit B
