Jeopardize the continued existence definition

Jeopardize the continued existence means to engage in an action that reasonably would be expected, directly or indirectly, to reduce appreciably the likelihood of both the survival and recovery of a listed species in the wild by reducing the reproduction, numbers, or distribution of that species (50 CFR §402.02).

Jeopardize the continued existence means to engage in an action that reasonably would be expected, directly or indirectly, to reduce appreciably the likelihood of both the survival and recovery of a listed species in the wild by reducing the reproduction, numbers, or distribution of that species (50 CFR §402.02). “Destruction or adverse modification” means a direct or indirect alteration that appreciably diminishes the value of designated critical habitat for the conservation of a listed species. Such alterations may include, but are not limited to, those that alter the physical or biological features essential to the conservation of a species or that preclude or significantly delay development of such features (50 CFR §402.02).

Jeopardize the continued existence means to engage in an action that reasonably would be expected, directly or indirectly, to reduce appreciably the likelihood of both the survival and recovery of a listed species in the wild by reducing the reproduction, numbers, or distribution of that species (50 CFR §402.02). “Destruction or adverse modification” means a direct or indirect alteration that appreciably diminishes the value of designated critical habitat for the conservation of a listed species. Such alterations may include, but are not limited to, those that alter the physical or biological features essential to the conservation of a species or that preclude or significantly delay development of such features (50 CFR §402.02). The Action assessed in this PBO does not affect designated critical habitat; therefore, this PBO does not further address critical habitat. This PBO uses hierarchical numeric section headings. Primary (level-1) sections are labeled sequentially with a single digit (e.g., 2. PROPOSED ACTION). Secondary (level-2) sections within each primary section are labeled with two digits (e.g., 2.1. Action Area), and so on for level-3 sections. The basis of our opinion for each listed/proposed species identified in the first paragraph of this introduction is wholly contained in a separate level-1 section that addresses its status, environmental baseline, effects of the Action, cumulative effects, and conclusion.

Examples of Jeopardize the continued existence in a sentence

• Jeopardize the continued existence of endangered or threatened species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of a critical habitat, protected under the Endangered Species Act of 1973.

• Jeopardize the continued existence of endangered or threatened species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of a critical habitat, protected under the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973.

• Jeopardize the continued existence of any species listed as endangered or threatened species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) or their critical habitat.

• Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA states that Federal agencies must ensure that their activities are not likely to: Jeopardize the continued existence of any listed species, or Result in the destruction or adverse modification of designated critical habitat.

• Section 7(a)(2) of the Act states that Federal agencies must ensure their activities are not likely to:- Jeopardize the continued existence of any listed species; or- Result in the destruction or adverse modification of designated critical habitat.

• Jeopardize the continued existence of a species means to engage in an action that reasonably would be expected, directly or indirectly, to reduce appreciably the likelihood of both survival and recovery of a listed species in the wild by reducing the reproduction, numbers, or distribution of that species.

• Policyholders will receive at least the guaranteed minimum maturity benefits.

• Jeopardize the continued existence of means to engage in an action that reasonably would be expected, directly or indirectly, to reduce appre- ciably the likelihood of both the survival and recovery of a listed species in the wild by reducing the reproduction, numbers, or distribution of that species.Listed species means any species of fish, wildlife, or plant which has been determined to be endan- gered or threatened under section 4 of the Act.

• Jeopardize the continued existence of – to engage in an action that reasonably would be expected, directly or indirectly, to reduce appreciably the likelihood of both the survival and recovery of a listed species in the wild by reducing the reproduction, numbers, or distribution of that species.

• Discharges cannot: ■ Cause or contribute to violations of State water quality standards (link to State 401 certification); ■ Violate toxic effluent standards under section 307 of the Clean Water Act (link to State 401 certification); ■ Jeopardize the continued existence of or critical habitat for endangered or threatened species; ■ Violate requirements of marine sanctuary designations.

More Definitions of Jeopardize the continued existence

Jeopardize the continued existence means to engage in an action that reasonably would be expected, directly or indirectly, to reduce appreciably the likelihood of both the survival and recovery of a listed species in the wild by reducing the reproduction, numbers, or distribution of that species (50 CFR §402.02). The Action would alter 9.5 river miles of Gulf sturgeon habitat in the Pearl River. Increased sedimentation and turbidity from the construction of the weir and fish passage channel, as well as erosion during the excavation phase of the approximately 5-year project would decrease the macroinvertebrates in the area. This decrease in food sources could lead any juveniles in the area to possibly leave in search of sustenance. The increased turbidity and sedimentation caused by all of the construction actions including the retrofitting or relocation of existing infrastructure would be temporary; therefore, as Gulf sturgeon are highly mobile and can avoid these areas, any effects on their overall health would be minimal. After construction has been completed, it is probable that sturgeon could return to the area as long as it is a year when water flow is high enough to migrate past the Poole’s Bluff Sill that occurs downstream. The anticipated changes in DO from the impoundment would impact any juveniles foraging in the area as well as their prey base. The reduction in water quality from lower DO levels would impact any foraging sturgeon in the area, but they are known to reduce activity to conserve energy to feed and grow in periods of low DO. The weir structure will possibly cause migration issues for the sturgeon; however, a fish passage feature has been designed for just downstream of the weir. The construction of the fish passage channel would increase the possibility of sturgeon having the ability to return to the area should they migrate into that reach of the river. The various stressors and forms of disturbance from the Action, considered separately, are not likely to cause harm of sturgeon found in the Action Area. However, considered collectively, the combined level of stressors and disturbances could result in harm to a maximum of 20 sturgeon (4.6 percent of the Pearl River population) utilizing the Action Area. The status of the subpopulation of Gulf sturgeon in the Pearl River has been shown to be stable. Our analysis indicates that while the Action would have a negative effect on those 20 sturgeon, such effects to4.6 percent of that subpopulation would not be appreciable f...

Jeopardize the continued existence means “engag[ing] in an action that reasonably would be expected, directly or indirectly, to reduce appreciably the likelihood of both the survival and recovery of a listed species in the wild by reducing the reproduction, numbers, or distribution of that species.” 50 C.F.R. § 402.02. Critical habitat includes “the specific areas within the geographical area occupied by the species . . . on which are found those physical or biological features (I) essential to the conservation of the species and (II) which may require special management considerations or protection. . . .” 16 U.S.C. § 1532(5)(A).

Jeopardize the continued existence of a species means “to engage in an action that reasonably would be expected, directly or indirectly, to reduce appreciably the likelihood of both survival and recovery in the wild by reducing the reproduction, numbers, and distribution of that species” (50 CFR 402.02). The NPS project contributes, both directly and indirectly, to the vulnerability of the Atlantic Coast piping plover population and the New York - New Jersey Recovery Unit in particular.

Jeopardize the continued existence means to engage in an action that reasonably would be expected, directly or indirectly, to reduce appreciably the likelihood of both the survival and recovery of a listed species in the wild by reducing the reproduction, numbers, or distribution of that species (50 CFR §402.02). After reviewing the current status of the Fat Pocketbook, Sheepnose, and Longsolid, the environmental baseline, the effects of the Action and the

Jeopardize the continued existence means to engage in an action that reasonably would be expected, directly or indirectly, to reduce appreciably the likelihood of both the survival and recovery of a listed species in the wild by reducing the reproduction, numbers, or distribution of that species (50 CFR §402.02). After reviewing the current status of the species, the environmental baseline for the Action Area, the effects of the Action and the cumulative effects, it is the Service’s biological opinion that the Action is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the sheepnose. This determination is based on several factors: (a) The mussel survey results showed low numbers of individuals that could be adversely affected within the project area, and these survey results are similar to other survey results in other areas near the action area that contain habitat suitable for the species; (b) This species continues to persist in the Ohio River and other portions of its range, often at higher population levels than those observed within the action area; and (c) The conservation measures will minimize the likelihood of mortality and other population effects by limiting the impact of barge fleeting activities to the defined fleeting area. In addition, the contribution of funds to use for mussel propagation and culture will assist in recovery of this listed mussel in the Ohio River. INCIDENTAL TAKE STATEMENT‌ESA §9 and regulations issued under §4(d) prohibit the take of endangered and threatened species, respectively, without special exemption. The term “take” in the ESA means “to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct.” The Service defines “harass” as an intentional or negligent act or omission that creates the likelihood of injury to wildlife by annoying it to such an extent as to significantly disrupt normal behavioral patterns, which include, but are not limited to, breeding, feeding or sheltering. The Service defines “harm” as an act that actually kills or injures wildlife, including significant habitat modification or degradation that significantly impairs essential behavioral patterns, such as breeding, feeding, or sheltering. “Incidental take” is defined as take that is incidental to, and not the purpose of, the carrying out of an otherwise lawful activity. Under the terms of ESA §7(b)(4) and §7(o)(2), taking that is incidental to and not intended as part of the agency action is not considered prohibite...

Jeopardize the continued existence means to engage in an action that reasonably would be expected, directly or indirectly, to reduce appreciably the likelihood of both the survival and