Additional Examples. (A) Calculating the Inflation Adjustment Percentages: Percentage to be applied on the Inflation Adjustment Percentage for the prior year (i.e., Inflation Payment Hypothetical the greater of 3% or the Adjustment Year CPI% CPI%) Percentage ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2000 2.4% 3.0% 3.0000000% 2001 2.1% 3.0% 6.0900000% 2002 3.5% 3.5% 9.8031500% 2003 3.5% 3.5% 13.6462603% 2004 4.0% 4.0% 18.1921107% 2005 2.2% 3.0% 21.7378740% 2006 1.6% 3.0% 25.3900102%
(B) Applying the Inflation Adjustment: Using the hypothetical Inflation Adjustment Percentages set forth in section (7)(A): -- the subsection IX(c)(1) base payment amount for 2002 of $6,500,000,000 as adjusted for inflation would equal $7,137,204,750; -- the subsection IX(c)(1) base payment amount for 2004 of $8,000,000,000 as adjusted for inflation would equal $9,455,368,856; -- the subsection IX(c)(1) base payment amount for 2006 of $8,000,000,000 as adjusted for inflation would equal $10,031,200,816. EXHIBIT D LIST OF LAWSUITS ----------------
1. ALABAMA XXXXXXXX ET AL. V. AMERICAN TOBACCO CO. ET AL., Circuit Court, Xxxxxxxxxx County, No. CV-96-1508-PR
Additional Examples. (A) Calculating the Inflation Adjustment Percentages: Percentage to be applied on the Inflation Adjustment Percentage for the prior year (i.e., Inflation Payment Hypothetical the greater of 3% or the Adjustment Year CPI% CPI%) Percentage -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2000 2.4% 3.0% 3.0000000% 2001 2.1% 3.0% 6.0900000% 2002 3.5% 3.5% 9.8031500% 2003 3.5% 3.5% 13.6462603% 2004 4.0% 4.0% 18.1921107% 2005 2.2% 3.0% 21.7378740% 2006 1.6% 3.0% 25.3900102%
(B) Applying the Inflation Adjustment: Using the hypothetical Inflation Adjustment Percentages set forth in section (7)(A): -- the subsection IX(c)(1) base payment amount for 2004 of $8,000,000,000 as adjusted for inflation would equal $9,455,368,856; -- the subsection IX(c)(1) base payment amount for 2006 of $8,000,000,000 as adjusted for inflation would equal $10,031,200,816. EXHIBIT D LIST OF LAWSUITS
1. Alabama Xxxxxxxx et al. v. American Tobacco Co. et al., Circuit Court, Xxxxxxxxxx County, No. CV-96-1508-PR
2. Alaska State of Alaska v. Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, Inc., et al., Superior Court, First Judicial District of Juneau, No. IJU-97915 CI (Alaska)
3. Arizona State of Arizona v. American Tobacco Co., Inc., et al., Superior Court, Maricopa County, No. CV-96-14769 (Ariz.)
4. Arkansas State of Arkansas v. The American Tobacco Co., Inc., et al., Chancery Court, 6th Division, Pulaski County, No. IJ 97-2982 (Ark.)
5. California People of the State of California et al. v. Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, Inc., et al., Superior Court, Sacramento County, No. 97-AS-30301
6. Colorado State of Colorado et al., v. X.
Additional Examples. (A) Calculating the Inflation Adjustment Percentages: Payment Year Hypothetical CPI% Percentage to be applied on the Inflation Adjustment Percentage for the prior year (i.e., the greater of 3% or the CPI%) Inflation Adjustment Percentage 2000 2.4% 3.0% 3.0000000% 2001 2.1% 3.0% 6.0900000% 2002 3.5% 3.5% 9.8031500% 2003 3.5% 3.5% 13.6462603% 2004 4.0% 4.0% 18.1921107% 2005 2.2% 3.0% 21.7378740% 2006 1.6% 3.0% 25.3900102%
(B) Applying the Inflation Adjustment: Using the hypothetical Inflation Adjustment Percentages set forth in section (7)(A): -- the subsection IX(c)(1) base payment amount for 2002 of $6,500,000,000 as adjusted for inflation would equal $7,137,204,750; -- the subsection IX(c)(1) base payment amount for 2004 of $8,000,000,000 as adjusted for inflation would equal $9,455,368,856; -- the subsection IX(c)(1) base payment amount for 2006 of $8,000,000,000 as adjusted for inflation would equal $10,031,200,816. EXHIBIT D LIST OF LAWSUITS
1. Alabama
Additional Examples. Teachers could also link the development of a rights respecting charter to lessons to improve social and emotional literacy. SEAL materials could be used for support if needed.
Additional Examples. Extra-curricular Supervision shall be defined as supervision of and planningfor approved voluntary student activities providedoutside of the regular program. A basketball tournament, outside of school hours, is consideredan event. Teacher involvement in activities is voluntary, and requiresthe consent of the teacher. Extra-curricularand overnight supervision activities to be offeredwill be locally determined and approved by the superintendent. A class field trip is not considered to be extra- curricular. In the event a class field trip that includes overnight supervision, the overnight supervision will be compensatedunder Extra-curricular or overnight supervision compensation is earned in twenty five (25) hour increments. A teacher shall be compensated in one of the following two ways: A teacher shall receiveone half (112) earned day off for each twenty five (25) hour increment,to a maximum of two (2) full days. A teacher shall receivethe minimum sub pay rate for each half day earned. I Tobe directly monitored during the time this agreement. Teachers providingovernight supervision of students will be compensatedat eight (8) hours per night. Extra-curricularhours and overnight supervision hours are to be submittedto the in-schooladministrator on a regular basis. Once submitted, time off may be taken as earned throughout the school year.
Additional Examples. Team Override commissions: 1.10% All generated Corporate Annual Sales = (Net) $100 Million Dollars Team override commission from the corporation given to the CEO = $1,100,000.oo Corporate Bonuses: 1.00% Annual - (Determined by the Board of Directors Quarterly = 0-1.0%) All generated Corporate Annual Sales = (Net) $100 Million Dollars Corporate Bonus from the corporation given to the CEO = $1,000,000.oo Profit Sharing: 1.00% Annual - (Determined by the Board of Directors Quarterly = 0-1.0%) All generated Corporate Annual Sales = (Net) $100 Million Dollars Profit Sharing from the corporation given to the CEO = $1,000,000.oo STRATEGIC ADVISORY BOARD AGREEMENT
Additional Examples. (1) As of January 1, 1998, the number of Assigned CPU MIPS equals (***). On March 12, 1998, CSG notifies FDT to increase its assignment of Assigned CPU MIPS to (***). FDT shall implement such increase on August 1, 1998. The monthly CPU MIPS charge for August, 1998 shall be calculated as follows: ((***) x $(***)) + (((***) - (***) x ($(***))) + (((***) - (***)) x $(***))) $(***) + $(***) + $(***) = $(***)
(2) As of January 1, 1999 and January 1, 2000, the number of Assigned CPU MIPS equals (***). On October 19, 1999, CSG notifies FDT to increase its assignment of Assigned CPU MIPS to (***). FDT shall implement such increase on March 1, 2000. The monthly CPU MIPS charge for March, 2000 shall be calculated as follows: ((***) x $(***)) + (((***) - (***)) x $(***))) + (((***) - (***)) x $(***))) + (((***) - (***)) x $(***))) $(***) + $(***) + (***) + $(***) = $(***)
(3) As of January 1, 1999 and January 1, 2000, the number of Assigned CPU MIPS equals (***). On October 14, 1999, CSG notifies FDT to decrease its assignment of Assigned CPU MIPS to (***). FDT shall implement such decrease on March 1, 2000. The monthly CPU MIPS charge for March, 2000 shall be calculated as follows: ((***) x $(***)) + (((***) - (***)) x $(***))) + (((***) - (***)) x $(***))) $(***) + $(***) + $(***) = $(***)
6. In example "a" to Note 2(A)(2) of Schedule 1.27, the two ------------- appearances of the term "(***) MIPS" shall each be replaced with the phrase "(***) CPU MIPS".
Additional Examples. (A) Calculating the Inflation Adjustment Percentages: Payment Year Hypothetical CPI% Percentage to be applied on the Inflation Adjustment Percentage for the prioryear (i.e., the greater of 3% or the CPI%) Inflation Adjustment Percentage 1998 2.4% 3.0% 3.0000000% 2001 2.1% 3.0% 6.0900000% 2002 3.5% 3.5% 9.8031500% 2003 3.5% 3.5% 13.6462603% 2004 4.0% 4.0% 18.1921107% 2005 2.2% 3.0% 21.7378740% 2006 1.6% 3.0% 25.3900102%
(B) Applying the Inflation Adjustment: Using the hypothetical Inflation Adjustment Percentages set forth in section (7)(A): — the subsection IX(c)
(1) base payment amount for 2002 of $6,500,000,000 as adjusted for inflation would equal $7,137,204,750; — the subsection IX(c)
(1) base payment amount for 2004 of $8,000,000,000 as adjusted for inflation would equal $9,455,368,856; — the subsection IX(c)
(1) base payment amount for 2006 of $8,000,000,000 as adjusted for inflation would equal $10,031,200,816. EXHIBIT D LIST OF LAWSUITS Circuit Court, Montgomery County, No. CV-96-1508-PR
Additional Examples. For clarity, additional examples of the calculation of royalties payable by Astellas to Maxygen pursuant to Sections 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 follows.
Additional Examples. Percentage to be applied on the Inflation Adjustment Percentage Payment for the prior year (i.e., the Inflation
(A) Calculating the Inflation Adjustment Percentages: [signature blocks]
(1) Any amount that, in any given year, is to be adjusted for inflation pursuant to this Exhibit (the ‘‘Ba se Amount ’’) shall be adjusted upward by adding to such Base Amount the Inflation Adjustment.
(2) The Inflation Adjustment shall be calculated by multiplying the Base Amount by the Inflation Adjustment Percentage applicable in that year.
(3) The Inflation Adjustment Percentage applicable to payments due in the year 2000 shall be equal to the greater of 3% or the CPI%. For example, if the Consumer Price Index for December 1999 (as released in J anuary 2000) is 2% higher than the Consumer Price Index for December 1998 (as released in J anuary 1999), then the CPI% with respect to a payment due in 2000 would be 2%. The Inflation Adjustment Percentage applicable in the year 2000 would thus be 3%.
(4) The Inflation Adjustment Percentage applicable to payments due in any year after 2000 shall be calculated by applying each year the greater of 3% or the CPI% on the Inflation Adjustment Percentage applicable to pay- ments due in the prior year. Continuing the example in subsection (3) above, if the CPI% with respect to a payment due in 2001 is 6%, then the Inflation Adjust-
(B) Applying the Inflation Adjustment: Using the hypothetical Inflation Adjustment Percent- ages set forth in section (7)(A): —the subsection IX(c)(1) base payment amount for 2002 of $6,500,000,000 as adjusted for inflation would equal $7,137,204,750; —the subsection IX(c)(1) base payment amount for 2004 of $8,000,000,000 as adjusted for inflation would equal $9,455,368,856; —the subsection IX(c)(1) base payment amount for 2006 of $8,000,000,000 as adjusted for inflation would equal $10,031,200,816.
1. Alabama Xxxxxxxx xt al. v. American Tobacco Co. et al., Circuit Court, Xxxxxxxxxx County, No. CV-96- 1508-PR
