and Table. 19-1 of the Technical Provisions, Developer shall set forth in the Renewal Work Schedule, by Element, (a) the estimated Useful Life, (b) the estimated Residual Life, (c) a brief description of the type of Renewal Work anticipated to be performed at the end of the Element’s Residual Life, (d) a brief description of any Renewal Work anticipated to be performed before the end of the Element’s Residual Life, including reasons why this work should be performed at the proposed time, (e) the estimated cost of such Renewal Work and (f) the total estimated cost of Renewal Work in each of the years Renewal Work is anticipated to be performed under the Renewal Work Schedule.
and Table. 19-1 of the Technical Provisions, Developer shall set forth in the Renewal Work Schedule, by Element, (a) the estimated Useful Life, (b) the estimated Residual Life, (c) a brief description of the type of Renewal Work anticipated to be performed at the end of the Element’s Residual Life, (d) a brief description of any Renewal Work anticipated to be performed before the end of the Element’s Residual Life, including reasons why this work should be performed at the proposed time, (e) the estimated cost of such Renewal Work and
and Table. 3-2. The agencies' proposals should be submitted to the City pursuant to a written schedule designed to allow time for negotiation of final scopes of work and memoranda of agreement within the City's annual budget cycle. If the agencies submit the necessary documentation immediately upon license issuance, the City may be able to fund the agencies’ projects in that year upon acceptance of the license. Failure by either agency to submit a proposal on the schedule required by the City may cause that agency’s portion of the funding cycle to be delayed without further indexing (Section 2.5.1) under this Agreement. If either agency is not able to enter into a memorandum of agreement with the City for all or part of the funding due in any particular year, the agency may request that the City retain outside contractors. The scope of work for such third party contracts shall be agreed upon by the City and the agency prior to the issuance of a Request for Proposals (RFP). The negotiation of scopes of work for spending of interpretive facility funds shall be subject to the following criteria: • All amounts indicated shall be spent; if the City and benefitting agency(s) cannot agree on a scope of work covering the amount allocated to any year, the unspent amount(s) shall be carried forward to the next year. In the event of failure to agree on a scope of work or memorandum of agreement for the expenditure of funds a second time, the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement may be invoked. The City and the benefitting agency may agree to reallocate the funds in question to another function.
and Table. 4.1. reveal that, although, the DMP requires higher total energy consumption or MEC servers’ energy consumption than the other schemes, i.e., SDG, SD-only and dynamic optimum, its SDs’ energy consumption is much lower than the other schemes. Specifically, the MEC servers’ energy consumption of the DMP exceeds that of the SDG by around 6%, but the SDs’ energy consumption of the DMP has a about 56% reduction compared to that of the SDG. Because the CPU cycle frequency of the MEC server is much higher than that of SD, the MEC server consumes more energy than SD under the same amount of tasks. This result implies that the DMP is much more efficient than the other schemes in allocating computation-intensive tasks to the MEC and enduring the battery life of the SDs as a result.
and Table. 2 Apart from the capital costs, recurrent costs, effluent quality, footprint requirement, environmental impacts and reuse potential, the following important aspects should be included in the assessment operational reliability (For it relates to arrangement of emergency shut down of the STW which is an essential part of designing the STW); tolerance to low flow condition at the commissioning of the STW; tolerance to significant variation of flow and load in public holidays; sludge production; necessity of installing disinfection facilities; and flexibility to further upgrade or expand the STW to meet projected demands or uncertainties over time. Noted. Operational reliability, sludge production and necessity for disinfection have been included in the table for comparison. The varying flow condition will have to be tolerated by all treatment options and regardless of choice of treatment option; the detailed design will have to address varying flow conditions which is typically expected in STW. The flexibility to further upgrade or expand is part of footprint assessment.
