Beneficiary Participation on Governing and Advisory Boards Sample Clauses

Beneficiary Participation on Governing and Advisory Boards. As part of the Demonstration, CMS and the State shall require Health Home Networks to establish mechanisms to ensure meaningful beneficiary input processes and the involvement of beneficiaries in planning and process improvements. This will be addressed in the State’s qualification process for Health Home Networks. In addition, the State will provide avenues for ongoing beneficiary or beneficiary advocates to provide input into the Demonstration model, including participation in the Service Experience Team (SET). The SET works in partnership with the State to promote choice, quality of life, health, independence, safety, and active engagement to program improvement and development. The SET consists of up to 12 clients representing a diverse cross-section of geography, gender and programs being utilized, three to five Advocacy Representatives, a Tribal Representative, and State staff. Feedback collected by the State will be shared with Health Home Networks and will be part of the State’s process improvement efforts.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Beneficiary Participation on Governing and Advisory Boards. CMS and the State shall require Demonstration Plans to obtain meaningful beneficiary input on issues of Demonstration management and Enrollee care. Demonstration plans must establish an independent Demonstration Plan beneficiary advisory committee. Throughout the operation of the Demonstration, Demonstration Plans will be required to meet quarterly with the beneficiary advisory committee. The Demonstration Plan must also assure that the beneficiary advisory committee composition reflects the diversity of the Demonstration population including Enrollees, caregivers, and local representation from key community stakeholders such as faith-based organizations, advocacy groups, and other community-based organizations. The State will maintain its website3 to provide updates on the Demonstration and have ongoing, quarterly stakeholder meetings through forums such as the Medicaid Advisory Committee (MAC), the MAC Care Coordination Subcommittee, or the Seniors and Persons with Disabilities (SPD) stakeholder group.
Beneficiary Participation on Governing and Advisory Boards. As part of the Demonstration, CMS and the State shall require the establishment of mechanisms to ensure meaningful beneficiary input processes and the involvement of beneficiaries in planning and process improvements. In addition, the State will provide avenues for ongoing beneficiary input into the Demonstration model, including beneficiary participation through the Colorado Medicare-Medicaid Enrollees Advisory Subcommittee, the ACC Program Improvement Advisory Committee and its standing subcommittees, the Community Living Advisory Group and its subcommittees, and the Nursing Facility Culture Change Accountability Board, which provide regular feedback to the State on the Demonstration. The Department also will continue to gather and incorporate stakeholder feedback as it works collaboratively with other state agencies and local partners serving Medicare-Medicaid enrollees in the Demonstration. Additionally, the State will monitor client and provider experiences through surveys, focus groups, and data analyses. The State will develop input processes and systems to monitor and measure the level of care provided to Medicare-Medicaid enrollees in the Demonstration. Moreover, as referenced previously in Section III.B.4, the State will utilize the beneficiary rights and protections alliance as a vehicle for additional beneficiary input and feedback throughout the Demonstration’s planning processes, implementation, and operation.
Beneficiary Participation on Governing and Advisory Boards. As part of the Demonstration, CMS and the State shall require Health Home Networks to establish mechanisms to ensure meaningful beneficiary input processes and the involvement of beneficiaries in planning and process improvements. This will be addressed in the State’s qualification process for Health Home Networks. In addition, the State will provide avenues for ongoing beneficiary input into the Demonstration model, including beneficiary participation in the HealthPathWashington Advisory Team (HAT), which provides regular feedback to the State on the Demonstration. Other mechanisms such as focus groups, surveys, and attendance at community meetings will be used to ensure beneficiaries participating in the Demonstration are encouraged to share their feedback and experience and help inform system improvements. Beneficiary feedback collected by the State will be shared with Health Home Networks and will be part of the State’s process improvement efforts.
Beneficiary Participation on Governing and Advisory Boards. As part of the three-way contract, CMS and the State shall require Participating Plans to obtain consumer and community input on issues of program management and Enrollee care through a range of approaches, which may include beneficiary participation on Participating Plan governing boards and quality review bodies. The ICO must also establish at least one consumer advisory committee and a process for that committee to provide input to the governing board. The ICO must also demonstrate participation of consumers with long term care needs, including Enrollees, within the governance structure of the ICO.

Related to Beneficiary Participation on Governing and Advisory Boards

  • Limitation on Judicial Council 's Liability The Judicial Council will not be responsible for loss or damage to any non-Judicial Council equipment or property arising from causes beyond the Judicial Council's control. In any event, the Judicial Council's responsibility for repairs and liability for damages or loss shall be limited to that made necessary by or resulting from the negligent acts or omissions of the Judicial Council or its officers, employees, or agents. The Judicial Council will not be liable for any charges incurred in connection with this Program, or any Judicial Council activities, unless expressly provided for under this Agreement.

  • Consideration of Criminal History in Hiring and Employment Decisions 10.14.1 Contractor agrees to comply fully with and be bound by all of the provisions of Chapter 12T, “City Contractor/Subcontractor Consideration of Criminal History in Hiring and Employment Decisions,” of the San Francisco Administrative Code (“Chapter 12T”), including the remedies provided, and implementing regulations, as may be amended from time to time. The provisions of Chapter 12T are incorporated by reference and made a part of this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. The text of the Chapter 12T is available on the web at xxxx://xxxxx.xxx/olse/fco. Contractor is required to comply with all of the applicable provisions of 12T, irrespective of the listing of obligations in this Section. Capitalized terms used in this Section and not defined in this Agreement shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in Chapter 12T.

  • INFORMATION ON THE PARTIES 4.1. The Group and the Tenant The principal activities of the Group are the operation and management of a network of department stores in the PRC. The Tenant is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company mainly participating in retail business.

  • Responsibilities and Restrictions Concerning Governing Body, Officers and Employees Grantee and its governing body will:

  • CFR Part 200 or Federal Provision - Xxxx Anti-Lobbying Amendment - Continued If you answered "No, Vendor does not certify - Lobbying to Report" to the above attribute question, you must download, read, execute, and upload the attachment entitled "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities - Standard Form - LLL", as instructed, to report the lobbying activities you performed or paid others to perform. 2 CFR Part 200 or Federal Provision - Federal Rule Compliance with all applicable standards, orders, or requirements issued under section 306 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 1857(h)), section 508 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1368), Executive Order 11738, and Environmental Protection Agency regulations (40 CFR part 15). (Contracts, subcontracts, and subgrants of amounts in excess of $100,000) Pursuant to the above, when federal funds are expended by ESC Region 8 and TIPS Members, ESC Region 8 and TIPS Members requires the proposer certify that in performance of the contracts, subcontracts, and subgrants of amounts in excess of $250,000, the vendor will be in compliance with all applicable standards, orders, or requirements issued under section 306 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 1857(h)), section 508 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1368), Executive Order 11738, and Environmental Protection Agency regulations (40 CFR part 15). Does vendor certify compliance? Yes

  • COOPERATION ON FRAUD 25.1. The Parties agree that they shall cooperate with one another to investigate, minimize and take corrective action in cases of fraud. The Parties’ fraud minimization procedures are to be cost effective and implemented so as not to unduly burden or harm one party as compared to the other.

  • NON-DISCRIMINATION IN HIRING AND EMPLOYMENT Competitive Supplier agrees to conduct its operations and activities under this ESA in accordance with all applicable state and federal laws regarding non-discrimination in hiring and employment of employees.

  • Special Rules Regarding Related Entities and Branches That Are Nonparticipating Financial Institutions If a Finnish Financial Institution, that otherwise meets the requirements described in paragraph 1 of this Article or is described in paragraph 3 or 4 of this Article, has a Related Entity or branch that operates in a jurisdiction that prevents such Related Entity or branch from fulfilling the requirements of a participating FFI or deemed-compliant FFI for purposes of section 1471 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code or has a Related Entity or branch that is treated as a Nonparticipating Financial Institution solely due to the expiration of the transitional rule for limited FFIs and limited branches under relevant U.S. Treasury Regulations, such Finnish Financial Institution shall continue to be in compliance with the terms of this Agreement and shall continue to be treated as a deemed- compliant FFI or exempt beneficial owner, as appropriate, for purposes of section 1471 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, provided that:

  • Credit Union’s Liability for Errors If the Credit Union does not properly complete a transaction according to this Agreement, the Credit Union will be liable for your losses or damages not to exceed the amount of the transaction, except as otherwise provided by law. The Credit Union will not be liable if: (a) through no fault of the Credit Union, your account does not contain enough money to make the transaction; (b) circumstances beyond the Credit Union's control prevents the transaction; (c) your loss is caused by your negligence or the negligence of another financial institution; or (d) the money in your account is subject to legal process or other claim. The Credit Union will not be liable for consequential damages except liability for wrongful dishonor. The Credit Union's actions will constitute the exercise of ordinary care if such actions or nonactions are consistent with applicable state law, Federal Reserve regulations and operating letters, clearing house rules, and general banking practices followed in the area serviced by the Credit Union. You grant the Credit Union the right, in making payments of deposited funds, to rely exclusively on the form of the account and the terms of this Account Agreement. Any conflict between oral representations by you or Credit Union employees and any written form will be resolved by reference to this Agreement and applicable written form.

  • Shared Governance The parties shall develop a variety of shared governance models which schools may consider. Schools shall select a model that best suits their needs or the staff may develop an alternative model of governance with direct involvement by teachers, other staff and community representatives. Staff approval and commitment to the model is essential. The selected model of governance will be specifically described in each school's improvement plan.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!