Complaint Reviews Sample Clauses

Complaint Reviews. By June 1, 2015, the University will review all complaints of sex discrimination filed by students through the formal sexual misconduct adjudication process during academic years 2012-2013, 2013-2014 and 2014-2015. These reviews will carefully scrutinize whether the University investigated all complaints or reports of sex discrimination promptly and adequately; used the appropriate definitions of sexual harassment under Title IX and applied the appropriate legal standard (preponderance of the evidence); provided interim relief to protect the complainant during the pendency of the investigation; provided notice of the outcome of the complaint investigation to the alleged victim and the alleged harasser; prevented any real or perceived conflicts of interest; took steps to prevent the recurrence of harassment and to address any hostile environment created by the harassment. Following its review, the University will take action as appropriate to address any concerns identified in the manner in which these complaints were handled; including providing appropriate remedies that may still be available for the parties in these cases, such as referrals to counseling or academic adjustments.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Complaint Reviews. Within 30 days of the effective date of this Agreement, DPD will designate one individual to review any written or oral complaint, charge, lawsuit, or other allegation made by, or on behalf of, a person with a disability, alleging noncompliance with, or alleging any actions that would be prohibited by, Title II or this Agreement. The designated individual will ensure that all such allegations are promptly reviewed, investigated, and addressed by appropriate action and the results of the review are provided in a timely manner to the complainant. The designated individual will be trained in and knowledgeable about the ADA and the terms of this Agreement and will investigate any complaint that DPD receives alleging that a person with a disability was discriminated against during a law enforcement activity.
Complaint Reviews. By September 30, 2017, the University will review all sexual harassment complaints filed during academic years 2015-2016 and 2016-2017. The University will review these files to determine whether the University investigated each complaint or report promptly and equitably, including but not limited to, specifically determining whether the University used the appropriate definitions and analyses of sexual harassment and hostile environment under Title IX; used the preponderance of the evidence standard; provided interim measures to protect the complainants and others during the pendency of the investigation; provided written notice of the outcome (including any appeal) and appeal rights to the complainants and the accused; and took steps to prevent the recurrence of sexual harassment and to address any hostile environment created by any sexual harassment. For any complaints which the University determines were not investigated in accordance with the requirements of Title IX, the University will take appropriate action to address any problems identified regarding the manner in which these complaints were handled, including providing appropriate remedies that may still be available for the complainants and/or accused students in these cases, such as counseling or academic adjustments.
Complaint Reviews 

Related to Complaint Reviews

  • Joint Review JADRC may, at the request of either party, review issues arising from the application of this Article.

  • Client Complaints The Operator and AHS shall promptly inform the other party of any material complaints, concerns or grievances made to or against the Operator with respect to the Services. The Operator acknowledges that AHS is required to establish and maintain a patient concerns resolution process in accordance with the Patient Concerns Resolution Process Regulation (AR 124/2006) and that AHS has been advised by the Office of the Alberta Ombudsman that all contracted service providers are also required to have a patient concerns resolution process in place. The Operator shall comply with the Patient Concerns Resolution Process in Schedule “D”, Appendix 5.

  • Complaints Investigation ‌ An employee who complains of harassment under the provisions of the Human Rights Code of British Columbia may refer the complaint to either one or other of the following processes:

  • Complaints and Feedback 15.3.1 The primary responsibility for receiving feedback and investigating complaints promptly and thoroughly in respect of the Services will rest with the Provider. The Provider will have procedures in place including but not limited to a complaints framework, which are acceptable to the Department, to gather and act upon feedback and complaints from Learners and/or their representatives and employers and the wider community. The Provider must also keep a log of the complaints received which will be accessible to the Department upon request.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Complaints If you have a complaint relating to the sale of energy by us to you, or this contract generally, you may lodge a complaint with us in accordance with our standard complaints and dispute resolution procedures. Note: Our standard complaints and dispute resolution procedures are published on our website.

  • Procurement Related Complaints and Administrative Review 49.1 The procedures for making a Procurement-related Complaint are as specified in the TDS.

  • Complaint To commence a proceeding, the complaining party (or parties) shall provide by certified mail, return receipt requested, a written Complaint to the BCBSA Corporate Secretary (which shall also constitute service on BCBSA if it is a respondent) and to any Plan(s) and/or Controlled Affiliate(s) named therein. The Complaint shall contain:

  • COMPLAINTS AND APPEALS As a Premera member, you have the right to offer your ideas, ask questions, voice complaints and request a formal appeal to reconsider decisions we have made. Our goal is to listen to your concerns and improve our service to you. If you need an interpreter to help with oral translation, please call us. Customer Service will be able to guide you through the service. WHEN YOU HAVE IDEAS We would like to hear from you. If you have an idea, suggestion, or opinion, please let us know. You can contact us at the addresses and telephone numbers found on the back cover. WHEN YOU HAVE QUESTIONS Please call us when you have questions about a benefit or coverage decision, our services, or the quality or availability of a healthcare service. We can quickly and informally correct errors, clarify benefits, or take steps to improve our service. We suggest that you call your provider of care when you have questions about the healthcare they provide.

  • Informal Grievance The aggrieved employee or group of employees or a representative of the Union shall orally present the grievance to the employee's Supervisor or his/her designated representative within five (5) standard working days following the occurrence of events on which the grievance is based. The Supervisor shall give his/her answer within five (5) standard working days of the date of presentation of the grievance. Grievance settlements at the informal level shall set no precedents in any future MOU interpretation.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.