Contribution Analysis Clause Samples

A Contribution Analysis clause defines the process for determining each party's share of responsibility or liability in situations where multiple parties may have contributed to a loss, damage, or claim. Typically, this clause outlines the method for apportioning costs, damages, or obligations based on the degree to which each party's actions or omissions contributed to the outcome. For example, if both parties are partially at fault for a breach or incident, the clause would specify how to calculate each party's respective share of liability. The core function of this clause is to ensure a fair and transparent allocation of responsibility, preventing one party from bearing the full burden when multiple parties are involved.
Contribution Analysis. Centerview performed a relative contribution analysis of Era and Bristow in which Centerview reviewed Era’s and Bristow’s respective contributions to the combined company based upon financial metrics that Centerview deemed in its experience and professional judgement to be relevant for the years 2019, 2020 and 2021, in each case using publicly available information obtained from public filings and other data sources, the Era Forecasts and the Bristow Forecasts and excluding the Synergies. These financial metrics included revenue, adjusted EBITDA, free cash flow and equity value. ○ Centerview calculated Era’s implied pro forma contribution to the Combined Company by multiplying Era’s contribution based upon the applicable financial metric by the Combined Company EV determined by summing Era’s EV assuming 6.5x NTM Run-Rate Adjusted, EBITDA and Bristow’s EV assuming 7.0x NTM Run-Rate Adjusted EBITDA (i.e., using the low ends of the ranges of multiples of EV to NTM Adjusted EBITDA discussed in the “Selected Trading Multiples Analysis” section) and adjusted for Era’s net debt. Era’s contribution ranged from 18% to 31%. ○ Centerview calculated Era’s implied pro forma contribution to the Combined Company by multiplying Era’s contribution based upon the applicable financial metric by the combined company EV determined by summing Era’s EV assuming 8.0x NTM Run-Rate Adjusted EBITDA and Bristow’s EV assuming 8.5x NTM Run-Rate Adjusted EBITDA (i.e., using the high ends of the ranges of multiples of EV to NTM Adjusted EBITDA discussed in the “Selected Trading Multiples Analysis” section) and adjusted for Era’s net debt. Era’s contribution ranged from 17% to 29%.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Contribution Analysis. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ also performed a contribution analysis which reviewed the implied ownership of the combined company for the existing group of Tudou shareholders and ADS holders based on certain financial metrics and historic operating metrics. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ computed the implied ownership for Tudou based on Management Projections for revenue, advertising revenue and gross profit through 2012. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ also computed the implied ownership for Tudou based on historic monthly operating data including daily click views, monthly unique visitors, monthly page views and monthly time spent based on the average of the last three months ending November 2011 from iResearch iUsertracker. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ also computed the implied ownership for Tudou based on cash available, defined as the aggregate of cash, restricted cash and short-term investments, as of December 2011 based on historic management accounts. The computation showed, among other things, that based on Management Projections for revenue, advertising revenue and gross profit through 2012, implied ownership for Tudou was 31.5%, 30.2% and 25.6%, respectively. Based on historic monthly operating data including daily click views, monthly unique visitors, monthly page views and monthly time spent, implied ownership for Tudou was 37.3%, 42.8%, 33.1% and 27.8%, respectively. Based on cash available, implied ownership for Tudou was 20.8%. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ noted that the ADS Exchange Ratio of 1.595 would result in pro forma ownership of the combined company for the existing group of Tudou shareholders and ADS holders equal to approximately 28.5%.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Contribution Analysis. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ analyzed the relative contribution of Meta and Crestmark to certain financial and operating metrics for the pro forma combined company resulting from the merger. Such financial and operating metrics included: (i) gross loans; (ii) deposits; (iii) tangible common equity as of September 30, 2017; (iv) net income for the last twelve months, or LTM, ended September 30, 2017; (v) estimated net income for the twelve months ended September 30, 2018 based on the Projections; and (vi) estimated net income for the twelve months ended September 30, 2019 based on the Projections. The relative contribution analysis did not give effect to any synergies or purchase accounting adjustments as a result of the merger. The results of this analysis are summarized in the table below: Meta Crestmark Exchange Gross Loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60.7% 39.3% 4.72x Deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77.4% 22.6% 2.15x Tangible Common Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76.2% 23.8% 2.30x Last-12-Months Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68.9% 31.1% 3.30x 2018E Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67.3% 32.7% 3.55x 2019E Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67.6% 32.4% 3.50x Exchange Ratio in the Merger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.65x
View Source
Contribution Analysis. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ analyzed the relative contribution of Dime and Bridge to certain financial and operating metrics for the pro forma resulting company resulting from the merger. The financial and operating metrics included: (i) total assets; (ii) gross loans; (iii) total deposits; (iv) non-interest bearing deposits; (v) tangible common equity; (vi) last twelve months core net income (which we refer to
View Source
Contribution Analysis. With the GHG inventories for two years available, Cascadia will also conduct a contribution analysis. With U.S. Department of Energy grant funds, ICLEI and Cascadia recently completed development of a user-friendly contribution analysis tool that allows cities to quantify the extent that external factors—such as population growth, weather patterns, electricity fuel mix, and economic conditions—drive emissions trends. For example, the tool can differentiate the increase in emissions attributable to population growth versus a colder winter. This state-of-the-art analytical technique reveals new inventory insights to inform climate action planning, such as by identifying key foci for emission reductions (e.g., electricity emissions factor) and quantifying the role of specific local actions in meeting reduction goals. Cascadia will provide the City with a completed two-year contribution analysis comparison (including delivery of the populated tool).
View Source

Related to Contribution Analysis

  • Investment Analysis and Implementation In carrying out its obligations under Section 1 hereof, the Advisor shall: (a) supervise all aspects of the operations of the Funds; (b) obtain and evaluate pertinent information about significant developments and economic, statistical and financial data, domestic, foreign or otherwise, whether affecting the economy generally or the Funds, and whether concerning the individual issuers whose securities are included in the assets of the Funds or the activities in which such issuers engage, or with respect to securities which the Advisor considers desirable for inclusion in the Funds' assets; (c) determine which issuers and securities shall be represented in the Funds' investment portfolios and regularly report thereon to the Board of Trustees; (d) formulate and implement continuing programs for the purchases and sales of the securities of such issuers and regularly report thereon to the Board of Trustees; and (e) take, on behalf of the Trust and the Funds, all actions which appear to the Trust and the Funds necessary to carry into effect such purchase and sale programs and supervisory functions as aforesaid, including but not limited to the placing of orders for the purchase and sale of securities for the Funds.

  • Escrow Analysis If applicable, with respect to each Mortgage Loan, the Seller has within the last twelve months (unless such Mortgage was originated within such twelve month period) analyzed the required Escrow Payments for each Mortgage and adjusted the amount of such payments so that, assuming all required payments are timely made, any deficiency will be eliminated on or before the first anniversary of such analysis, or any overage will be refunded to the Mortgagor, in accordance with RESPA and any other applicable law;

  • Sampling and Analysis The sampling and analysis of the coal delivered hereunder shall be performed by Buyer upon delivery of the coal to Buyer’s facility, and the results thereof shall be accepted and used as defining the quality and characteristics of the coal delivered under this Agreement and as the Payment Analysis. All analyses shall be made in Buyer’s laboratory at Buyer’s expense in accordance with ASTM standards where applicable, or industry-accepted standards in other cases. Samples for analyses shall be taken in accordance with ASTM standards or other methods mutually acceptable to both parties. Seller shall transmit its “as loaded” quality analysis to Buyer as soon as possible. Seller’s “as-loaded” quality shall be the Payment Analysis only when Buyer’s sampler and/or scales are inoperable, or if Buyer fails to obtain a sample upon unloading. Seller represents that it is familiar with Buyer’s sampling and analysis practices, and that it finds them to be acceptable. Buyer shall notify Seller in writing of any significant changes in Buyer’s sampling and analysis practices. Any such changes in Buyer’s sampling and analysis practices shall, except for ASTM or industry-accepted changes in practices, provide for no less accuracy than the sampling and analysis practices existing at the tune of the execution of this Agreement, unless the Parties otherwise mutually agree. Each sample taken by Buyer shall be divided into four (4) parts and put into airtight containers, properly labeled and sealed. One (1) part shall be used for analysis by Buyer. One (1) part shall be used by Buyer as a check sample, if Buyer in its sole judgment determines it is necessary. One (1) part shall be retained by Buyer until thirty (30) days after the sample is taken (“Disposal Date”), and shall be delivered to Seller for analysis if Seller so requests before the Disposal Date. One (1) part (the “Referee Sample”) shall be retained by Buyer until the Disposal Date. Seller shall be given copies of all analyses made by Buyer by the fifth (5th) business day of the month following the month of unloading. In addition, Buyer shall send Seller weekly analyses of coal unloaded at Buyer’s facilities. Seller, on reasonable notice to Buyer, shall have the right to have a representative present to observe the sampling and analyses performed by Buyer. Unless Seller requests an analysis of the Referee Sample before the Disposal Date, Buyer’s analysis shall be used to determine the quality of the coal delivered hereunder and shall be the Payment Analysis. The Monthly Weighted Averages of specifications referenced in §6.1 shall be based on the individual Shipment analyses. If any dispute arises with regard to the analysis of any sample before the Disposal Date for such sample, the Referee Sample retained by Buyer shall be submitted for analysis to an independent commercial testing laboratory (“Independent Lab”) mutually chosen by Buyer and Seller. For each coal quality specification in question, if the analysis of the Independent Lab differs by more than the applicable ASTM reproducibility standards, the Independent Lab results will govern, and the prior analysis shall be disregarded. All testing of the Referee Sample by the Independent Lab shall be at requestor’s expense unless the Independent Lab results differ from the original Payment Analysis for any specification by more than the applicable ASTM reproducibility standards as to that specification. In such case, the cost of the analysis made by the Independent Lab shall be borne by the party who provided the original Payment Analysis.

  • Quantitative Analysis Quantitative analysts develop and apply financial models designed to enable equity portfolio managers and fundamental analysts to screen potential and current investments, assess relative risk and enhance performance relative to benchmarks and peers. To the extent that such services are to be provided with respect to any Account which is a registered investment company, Categories 3, 4 and 5 above shall be treated as “investment advisory services” for purposes of Section 5(b) of the Agreement.”

  • Risk Analysis The Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis with respect to Securities Depositories operating in the countries listed in Appendix B. If the Custodian is unable to provide a Risk Analysis with respect to a particular Securities Depository, it will notify the Fund. If a new Securities Depository commences operation in one of the Appendix B countries, the Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis in a reasonably practicable time after such Securities Depository becomes operational. If a new country is added to Appendix B, the Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis with respect to each Securities Depository in that country within a reasonably practicable time after the addition of the country to Appendix B.