Cost Neutrality. Altumint, and not Client, shall be responsible for all ongoing costs of the program. Specifically, Client shall not pay any “upfront” or capital costs for the Monitoring System. In the event that the total monthly fees set forth in Schedule A exceed the gross revenues of fines collected in a given month, the remaining unpaid fees shall “rollover” and be added to the following month’s fee total. Upon the termination or expiration of this Agreement, to the extent any unpaid rollover amounts would otherwise be owed to Altumint, such amounts shall be forgiven and no payment will be owed by Client.
Cost Neutrality. 3.19.1. Any allowance approved by the Chief Executive pursuant to Clause 1.10.1, including any allowance that is aggregated into an annualised salary, which is recognised for the purposes of superannuation shall be cost neutral to NSW Maritime.
Cost Neutrality. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, if any invoice for compensation owed to RedSpeed from Municipality is higher than the amount collected, the balance owed to RedSpeed will be carried over and paid by the Municipality in the following month. Payment will only be made by Municipality up to the amount of cash received by Municipality through the collection of Red Light Citations up to the amount currently due. Cost neutrality is assured to Municipality as the Municipality shall never have to pay RedSpeed more than the actual cash received.
Cost Neutrality. In July 2007, Los Angeles County entered into an agreement with the State to become part of the Title IV-E Waiver Capped Allocation Demonstration Project, under which State cost neutrality is assured since the State Allocation is capped for five years. However, every reasonable attempt has been made to demonstrate how the County would appear as a non-Title IV-E Waiver county in this funding model including State and County cost neutrality provisions, provider cost estimates, and delineation of Federal Title IV-E and State AFDC maintenance and administrative funds, and other funding streams such as SB-163, and EPSDT costs. Table 1. Monthly Cost of Open Doors care, the Provider Open Doors Cost Spreadsheet, and Attachments A and B are examples where this effort is clearly evident. In general terms noted throughout this document cost neutrality has been taken into consideration as follows:
Cost Neutrality. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, except for paragraph 5.c and the Non-Productive Cameras paragraph, if any monthly invoice for compensation owed to REDSPEED from GOVERNING BODY exceeds the amount of fine payments collected for that invoice month, the balance owed to REDSPEED will be carried over and paid by GOVERNING BODY in the following invoice month. GOVERNING BODY will only pay applicable REDSPEED Service Fees from funds collected from Red-Light Citation fine payments up to the Service Fee amount currently due. Cost Neutrality is assured to the GOVERNING BODY as the GOVERNING BODY shall never be required to pay REDSPEED an amount higher than the actual fine amount collected.
Cost Neutrality. The Customer agrees to pay Redflex within thirty (30) days after the invoice is received. Customer shall be obligated to pay the cumulative balance invoiced by Redflex, in accordance with terms set forth above, to the extent of gross cash received by the Customer from automated red light violations. In the event that a balance remains unpaid due to a deficit in gross cash received by the Customer compared to invoiced amounts, Customer will provide to Redflex, with each monthly payment, an accounting of such gross receipts supporting the amount withheld. Said balance, if any, will carry-over, interest free, month to month, until paid or the contract terminates, at such time any carryover balance will be waived if not satisfied by citations already issued and paid over the course of the subsequent 12 month period.
