Neutrality. The Polk County Public Schools hereinafter “the District” any members of management including but not limited to administrators, supervisors, agents, or other representatives) will remain neutral and will not oppose attempts by employees to organize or select a collective bargaining representative and will not take any action or make any statement that directly or indirectly states or implies any opposition by the Employer to the selection by the employees of a collective bargaining representative.
Neutrality means that management shall not, within the course and scope of their employment by the Company, express any opinion for or against Union representation of any existing or proposed new bargaining unit, or for or against the Union or any officer, member or representative thereof in their capacity as such. Furthermore, management shall not make any statements or representations as to the potential effects or results of Union representation on the Company or any employee or group of employees. The Union also agrees that, in the course of any effort by the Union to obtain written authorizations from employees as provided for in paragraph 3. (b)., above, neither the Union nor any of its officers, representatives, agents or employees will express publicly any negative comments concerning the motives, integrity or character of the Company, AT&T, Inc., or any of their officers, agents, directors or employees.
Examples of Neutrality in a sentence
The Budget Neutrality Specifications Manual must be made available to CMS on request.
The Budget Neutrality Specifications Manual will also describe how the state compiles counts of Medicaid member months.
The state will create and maintain a Budget Neutrality Specifications Manual that describes in detail how the state will compile data on actual expenditures related to budget neutrality, including methods used to extract and compile data from the state’s Medicaid Management Information System, eligibility system, and accounting systems for reporting on the CMS-64, consistent with the terms of the demonstration.
The Composite Federal Share for the Hypothetical Budget Neutrality Test is calculated based on all MEGs indicated as “WW Only” or “Both.” MEGs that are indicated as “WW Only” or “Both” are counted as expenditures against this budget neutrality expenditure limit.
Any expenditures in excess of the limit from Hypothetical Budget Neutrality Test are counted as WW expenditures under the Main Budget Neutrality Test.
More Definitions of Neutrality
Neutrality means the following at the Company’s facilities covered by this Agreement.
2.1.2.1 The Company and/or Union will not engage in any communication or other conduct that evidences, either directly or indirectly, a negative, derogatory, or demeaning attitude toward the Company or the Union (including the Company’s or Union’s motives, integrity, character, or performance) or about labor organizations or management generally.
2.1.2.2 The Company will not engage in any communications or conduct that directly or indirectly, demonstrates or implies opposition to unionization of its employees.
2.1.2.3 Dxxx will not employ, retain, or consult with any firm, association, entity, or individual for the purpose of resisting or opposing unionization by the USW or attempt to influence employees regarding unionization by the USW.
2.1.2.4 The Company will advise its employees that it is totally neutral regarding the issue of representation by the Union and whether or not the employees select the Union as their collective bargaining representative. The Company will advise its employees that it has a constructive and positive relationship with the USW, and that a Neutrality Agreement exists. The Union and Company will make available a copy of the Neutrality Agreement to employees.
2.1.2.5 The Company will not provide any support or assistance of any kind to any person or group that is supporting or opposing the selection of the Union as the bargaining representative of the employees.
2.1.2.6 The Company and the Union recognize that the employees have a legal right to express their opinion provided such expression is within the law and lawful Company rules and regulations.
2.1.2.7 The Company will not make any statements or representations as to the potential negative effects or results of representation by the Union on the Company, the employees, or any group of employees.
2.1.2.8 The Company and/or the Union will not verbally or in any written communication publicly or privately disparage the other party as a whole nor any individual management or Union person.
Neutrality. . The latter means action or declaration made by any State that conveys its neutral status in international relations. Thus, L. Marion asserted that “while neutrality is an institutional norm that is solidly founded in international law, neutralization seems to be a concept that pertains much more to diplomatic strategy, than to a legal approach” [16, p. 227].
Neutrality. Means avoiding deliberate bias in arriving at predetermined results to serve a particular group.
Neutrality means not being aligned with or favoring one participant over another. Neutrality does not mean the absence of an opinion regarding a specific issue.
Neutrality means that ICA-RUS should strive as far as possible to avoid bias toward particular value judgments or political standpoints. ICA-RUS’s position is that the role of science in risk management is to develop and present to society frameworks of judgment, with the actual judgments themselves being left open to society. To ensure that no specific value judgments are implicit in the premises used at any stage of the research process, effort is made to ensure participants can check one another’s work through mechanisms such as the Synthesis Meeting. Although ICA-RUS is funded by the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund of the Ministry of the Environment of Japan, the content and conclusions of its research are understood to be independent of the influence of the ministry’s administrative position.
Neutrality means that a company cannot select information to favor one set of parties over another. Reporting unbiased information must be the overriding consideration. If financial reporting is biased, financial reports will lose their credibility. (b) (Note to instructor: There are a multitude of answers possible here. The suggestions below are intended to serve as examples.) (1) Forecasts of future operating results and projections of future cash flows may be highly relevant to some decision makers. However, they would not be as representationally faithful as historical cost information about past transactions. (2) Proposed new accounting methods may be more relevant to many decision makers than existing methods. However, if adopted, they would impair consistency and make trend comparisons of a company’s results over time difficult or impossible. (3) There presently exists much diversity among acceptable accounting methods and procedures. In order to facilitate comparability between companies, the use of only one accepted accounting method for a particular type of transaction could be required. However, consistency would be impaired for those firms changing to the new required methods. (4) Occasionally, relevant information is exceedingly complex. Judgment is required in determining the optimum trade-off between relevance and understandability. Information about the impact of general and specific price changes may be highly relevant but not understandable by all users. (c) Although trade-offs result in the sacrifice of some desirable quality of information, the overall result should be information that is more useful for decision making. Additionally, the increased usefulness should provide a benefit greater than any additional cost associated with providing the information. At times, however, costs and benefits can be difficult or impossible to quantify. Such cases require judgment as to whether benefits exceed costs. FINANCIAL REPORTING PROBLEM
Neutrality means that a regulatory body is neutral from any regulated bodies (telecommunications business carriers), and "fairness" denotes that a regulatory bodies is fair to any regulated bodies (telecommunications carriers).