Cultural and Historical Analysis Sample Clauses

Cultural and Historical Analysis. This task is to provide a cultural resource survey to meet federal, state, and local compliance. The study will be designed to meet the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and Section 4(f) of the U.S. Department of Transportation Act. The survey will also be done to meet the standards and guidelines of the Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP), if requested. The archaeological field work will include a pedestrian survey of the Area of Potential Effects (APE) walking transects spaced 10 to 20 meters apart. Shovel testing will be done where the surface visibility is inadequate to determine if an archaeological site is present. Historic resources (i.e., buildings, structures, sites, objects, and districts constructed at least 45 years before the date of survey) will be documented if they are within or on a parcel crossed by an APE. The tasks anticipated will include the following: ▪ Identification of the APE and submittal of a work plan including a detailed project description and map to WSDOT. ▪ Communications on an as-needed basis with the project proponent, relevant agencies and affected Tribes. This does not take the place of the lead federal agency’s government-to-government responsibilities under Section 106. ▪ Background review of the previous studies conducted in the vicinity. ▪ A systematic pedestrian archaeological survey of the APE walking transects spaced no more than 20 meters apart. ▪ Excavation of up to 6 shovel tests that will be 20 inches (in) (50 centimeters [cm]) in diameter and excavated to a minimum depth of 20 in (50 cm). Sediments will be screened using ⅛-in hardware cloth. All shovel tests will be backfilled upon completion. No artifacts will be collected. Archaeological resources, if found, will need to be recorded. ▪ Documentation of historic resources that are within the APE or are situated on parcels crossed by the APE. Inventory forms will be prepared for each documented historic resource using the DAHP WISAARD database; the forms will be included in the report appendix. Evaluate documented historic resources to determine their eligibility to be listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). An assessment of project effects under Section 106 and potential “use” under Section 4(f) will be done for those historic resources that are recommended as eligible for listing in the NRHP. ▪ Preparing a technical report that satisfies Section 106 requirements and pr...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Cultural and Historical Analysis. Scope of Work
Sample 1

Related to Cultural and Historical Analysis

  • For Product Development Projects and Project Demonstrations  Published documents, including date, title, and periodical name.  Estimated or actual energy and cost savings, and estimated statewide energy savings once market potential has been realized. Identify all assumptions used in the estimates.  Greenhouse gas and criteria emissions reductions.  Other non-energy benefits such as reliability, public safety, lower operational cost, environmental improvement, indoor environmental quality, and societal benefits.  Data on potential job creation, market potential, economic development, and increased state revenue as a result of the project.  A discussion of project product downloads from websites, and publications in technical journals.  A comparison of project expectations and performance. Discuss whether the goals and objectives of the Agreement have been met and what improvements are needed, if any.

  • Research Use Reporting To assure adherence to NIH GDS Policy, the PI agrees to provide annual Progress Updates as part of the annual Project Renewal or Project Close-out processes, prior to the expiration of the one (1) year data access period. The PI who is seeking Renewal or Close-out of a project agree to complete the appropriate online forms and provide specific information such as how the data have been used, including publications or presentations that resulted from the use of the requested dataset(s), a summary of any plans for future research use (if the PI is seeking renewal), any violations of the terms of access described within this Agreement and the implemented remediation, and information on any downstream intellectual property generated from the data. The PI also may include general comments regarding suggestions for improving the data access process in general. Information provided in the progress updates helps NIH evaluate program activities and may be considered by the NIH GDS governance committees as part of NIH’s effort to provide ongoing stewardship of data sharing activities subject to the NIH GDS Policy.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.