Decision-Making and Follow-up Sample Clauses

Decision-Making and Follow-up. After investigating the reported behaviour, the Discipline Committee may issue a written Violation Notice to the skier and his/her family, including the outline and timeline of a consequence. Depending on the frequency and/or the severity of behaviour, and taking into account the context of the situation, consequences may include, but are not limited to: - loss of privilege to participate in ski racing for a defined time frame (for example, two weeks, including any scheduled races) - loss of privilege to participate for the remainder of a season, or - indefinite loss of privilege to ski race, along with a loss of membership in the club. Final decisions of the Apex Ski Club Discipline Committee may be appealed to the Apex Ski Club Executive. The Executive may choose to take the matter to BC Alpine for review.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Decision-Making and Follow-up. After investigating the reported behaviour, the Discipline Committee may issue a written Violation Notice to the member, including the outline and timeline of a consequence. Depending on the frequency and/or the severity of behaviour, and taking into account the context of the situation, consequences may include, but are not limited to: - loss of privilege to participate in ski racing for a defined time frame (for example, two weeks, including any scheduled races) - loss of privilege to participate for the remainder of a season, or - indefinite loss of privilege to ski race, along with a loss of membership in the club. Final decisions of the Apex Ski Club Discipline Committee may be appealed to the Apex Ski Club Board. The Board may choose to take the matter to BC Alpine for review. APPENDIX 1 Apex Ski Club Levels of Infractions & Options for Consequences - Athletes Level 1 Infractions – missing training sessions without coach consent – teasing – swearing – being disrespectful – being ‘inappropriate’ in lift line-ups – failing to set a positive example for younger racers – not meeting his or her potential in academic studies – failing to be a ‘team player’ – engaging in in-team boyfriend/girlfriend relationships – misuse of cellular phones and electronics1 (see next page) Level 1 Consequences 1st Time – prompt reminder of Apex Ski Club member Code of Conduct – documentation by adult involved in discipline (typically the coach at this level) 2nd Time – documentation and restitution by athlete (adult creates with athlete a condition of recognizing the wrong, fixing the wrong, and returning to the team changed) 3rd Time – documentation and restitution by athlete; home contact by the coach. Level 2 Infractions – repeat Level 1 infractions Level 2 Consequences – prompt transfer of documentation to Disciplinary Chair – meeting held involving coach, parent, athlete and Disciplinary Chair – suitable action taken like: 1. Service to the ski club 2. Written plan, with timeline, for the improvement of the athlete’s conduct Level 3 Infractions (Major Infractions) – using alcohol, drugs, tobacco, vaping or any illicit substance – engaging in sexual conduct or misconduct – explicit swearing – harassment – hazing – bullying including all electronic communication and internet bullying – theft – vandalism – overt disrespect to coach, officials, volunteers – engaging in unsafe, unsanctioned activities – engaging in illicit or criminal behaviour Level 3 Consequences – docume...
Sample 1

Related to Decision-Making and Follow-up

  • Decision Making All decisions of the JCC require unanimous agreement of the Parties, with each Party having one (1) vote on all matters presented to the JCC for resolution or decision. The members of the JCC will attempt in good faith to reach consensus on all matters before the JCC. In the event that the JCC cannot, after such good-faith efforts, reach agreement on a matter within the jurisdiction of the JCC, including any adoption, amendment or update to a Co-Promotion Plan within […***…], the issue shall be elevated to a Executive Officer of each of Ambit and Astellas, to seek in good faith to reach agreement on the issue. Solely in the case of a dispute regarding the Direct Marketing/Promotion Expenses or the Indirect Marketing Expenses proposed to be included in the Co-Promotion Plan budget (or any proposed amendment or update thereto) (in each case, a “Proposed Expense Dispute”), the Parties shall exchange written proposals regarding the portion of the budget in dispute in advance of elevating such dispute to the Executive Officers. In the event such executives cannot resolve the issue after good-faith efforts within […***…], then (a) if the dispute is a Proposed Expense Dispute, either Party shall have the right to cause the Dispute to be resolved by expedited arbitration pursuant to Exhibit E, and (b) if the dispute concerns any other issue the issue shall be decided by Astellas, in its reasonable discretion but subject to Astellas’s obligation to use Commercially Reasonable Efforts as set forth in Section 3.6.1 and taking into account the legitimate business issues of Ambit with respect to the issue. Astellas shall provide Ambit with a Decision Notice with respect to such decision, which decision shall be final and binding on the Parties. For clarity, in the event of a dispute concerning the Co-Promotion Plan budget which is resolved by expedited arbitration, Astellas may, but shall not be required to, perform the activities contemplated in its proposed Co-Promotion Plan budget, but the Direct Marketing/Promotion Expenses and Indirect Marketing Expenses incurred by Astellas during the Calendar Year covered by the disputed budget shall only be included in the calculation of the Annual U.S. Profit/Loss up to the amount of the Arbitrator-Determined Marketing Budget (as defined in Exhibit E), and such additional amounts shall be borne solely by Astellas. ***Confidential Treatment Requested CONFIDENTIAL 4. FEES, MILESTONES, ROYALTIES AND PROFIT SHARE

  • Monitoring and Review 5.1 The Council and the BID Company shall set up the Standard Services Review Panel within 28 days from the date of this Agreement the purpose of which shall be to:

  • Shared Decision Making 33-1 Purpose The purpose of a shared decision making program is to create an atmosphere in which decision making is a collegial, shared, process that fosters an exchange of ideas and information necessary for effective professional practice and for improved student performance. The Association and District agree to continue pursuing jointly the implementation of legitimately recognized school councils as a foundation of a shared decision-making program. All provisions of this Agreement shall continue to be in full force and effect throughout the process.

  • Consideration of Criminal History in Hiring and Employment Decisions 10.14.1 Contractor agrees to comply fully with and be bound by all of the provisions of Chapter 12T, “City Contractor/Subcontractor Consideration of Criminal History in Hiring and Employment Decisions,” of the San Francisco Administrative Code (“Chapter 12T”), including the remedies provided, and implementing regulations, as may be amended from time to time. The provisions of Chapter 12T are incorporated by reference and made a part of this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. The text of the Chapter 12T is available on the web at xxxx://xxxxx.xxx/olse/fco. Contractor is required to comply with all of the applicable provisions of 12T, irrespective of the listing of obligations in this Section. Capitalized terms used in this Section and not defined in this Agreement shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in Chapter 12T.

  • Monitoring and Auditing 7.1. Site visits by Sponsor and/or its authorized designee (e.g., Study monitor) will be scheduled in advance for times mutually acceptable to the Parties during normal business hours. Sponsor’s and/or authorized designee’s access is subject to reasonable safeguards to ensure confidentiality of medical records and systems.

  • NMHS Governance, Safety and Quality Requirements 3.1 Participates in the maintenance of a safe work environment.

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation (c) The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.