Determinations, Evaluations, and Assessment Sample Clauses

Determinations, Evaluations, and Assessment. If the discovery is determined to be an archaeological resource, protection measures will be determined through discussion between SpaceX, FAA, and Texas SHPO and implemented as soon as possible. The CRS will determine the boundary of the discovery within seven days, if possible, and allow ground disturbing activities to continue within 30 meters of the site boundary. Of particular importance will be a determination of whether the discovery includes human remains (if not already determined). If the discovery is determined to comprise human remains, the additional provisions described in Section 3.0 will be followed. For the discovery of other cultural materials, including historic period artifacts, funerary objects, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony, the CRS will document the discovery to Texas SHPO standards, evaluate it for NRHP eligibility in accordance with 36 CFR 800.4(c), and provide a report to the FAA that meets Texas SHPO and Council of Texas Archaeologists standards. The report will be provided to the FAA within 30 days of the discovery. Upon approval of the report, the FAA will distribute the report to the PA Signatories and Invited Signatories. The FAA will consult with the Texas SHPO and any affected Native American tribe on the NRHP eligibility determination. This consultation will be completed within 30 days. If the FAA determines, in consultation with the Texas SHPO and any affected Native American tribe, that the discovery is not a historic property, the FAA will notify SpaceX that activities in the area of the discovery may resume immediately. If the FAA determines the discovery is a historic property, a determination of effects will be made by the FAA within 10 days in consultation with the Texas SHPO and any affected Native American tribe in accordance with 36 CFR §800.5. The FAA will report the determination to all PA Signatories and Invited Signatories within 10 days of the determination. Adverse effects will be resolved by the FAA in consultation with the Texas SHPO following the procedures and timeframes set forth in 36 CFR §800.6. The FAA will ensure the PA Signatories and Invited Signatories are involved in the discussions of the proposed treatment plan. SpaceX will be responsible for the preparation of a treatment plan for adverse effects to any historic property that is discovered during construction. The treatments recommended will depend upon the nature of the discovery, its type and level of significance, the n...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Determinations, Evaluations, and Assessment

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. No response TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Yes - No Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. Xxxxxxxxx & Xxxxxx will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

  • FINANCIAL EVALUATION (a) The financial bid shall be opened of only those bidders who have been found to be technically eligible. The financial bids shall be opened in presence of representatives of technically eligible bidders, who may like to be present. The institute shall inform the date, place and time for opening of financial bid.

  • Re-evaluation a) When a job has moved to a higher group as a result of re-evaluation, the resulting rate shall be retroactive from the date that Management or the employee has applied to the Plant Job Review Committee for re-evaluation.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Formal Evaluations The employer shall undertake formal evaluations of an employee’s performance of the various duties and responsibilities of a position only if one or more of the following conditions is present: • employee request • mutual agreement of hiring unit and employee • recommendation arising from informal evaluation • decision of Chair, Xxxx, Director or designate resulting from the processing of a complaint in accordance with Article 8.

  • Focused Evaluation The Focused Evaluation is used when a teacher is not evaluated using the Comprehensive Evaluation process, and will include evaluation of one of the eight state criteria (student growth impact required). If a non-provisional teacher has scored at Proficient or higher the previous year, they may be moved to Focused Evaluation. The teacher may remain on the Focused Evaluation for five (5) years before returning to the Comprehensive Evaluation. The teacher or the evaluator can initiate a move from the Focused to the Comprehensive Evaluation. A decision to move a teacher from a Focused to a Comprehensive Evaluation must occur by December 15.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.