We use cookies on our site to analyze traffic, enhance your experience, and provide you with tailored content.

For more information visit our privacy policy.

Ethical Approval Sample Clauses

Ethical Approval. You will comply with clause 2.9 of the Code of Ethics when carrying out any health or disability research involving Service Users or members of the public. Where you become involved in such an activity you will ensure that a documented procedure for seeking ethical approval from a regional ethics committee accredited by the Health Research Council is developed for use within the Service, and that such approval is sought and obtained, as applicable.
Ethical Approval. ‌ All studies were approved by the relevant local NHS Research and Ethics Committee (REC) and by the Trust R&D Department. The following REC references apply: • Chapter 3. The effect of inorganic nitrite on conduit arteries. 11/H0802/4: Regulation of vascular tone in conduit and resistance vasculature. 12/LO/1066: An investigation of the effects of nitrite on coronary arteries. • Chapter 4. The effect of inorganic nitrite on left ventricular function in the human heart. 12/LO/1067: An investigation into the effects of sodium nitrite on cardiac function in patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation • Chapter 5: Enhanced blood pressure-lowering effects of a beetroot juice and grapefruit juice cocktail compared to beetroot juice alone: a randomised cross-over study. 10/H0802/52: Relationship between nitrate/nitrite handling and glucose tolerance, Grapefruit and Dietary Nitrate sub-study • Chapter 6. The effect of altering oral pH on bioactivation of dietary inorganic nitrate. 10/H0802/52: Relationship between nitrate/nitrite handling and glucose tolerance, Chewing gum sub-study.
Ethical Approval. All procedures conducted in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical xxxx- dards of the institutional and/or national research ethics committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM PPI/111/8/JEP-2017-133). Written informed consent was obtained from all research participants included in the study.
Ethical Approval. Ethical approval for individual studies within the project will be sought from appropriate ethical committees within the country where the research is taking place and by the organisation leading the research. An outline of planned research is provided in Deliverable 2.1 (List of usage scenarios and user requirements). Briefly, four main studies will be carried out, in addition to ad hoc gathering of user opinions, to inform next steps within the project. Procedures relevant to each organisation and approximate approval timeframes are detailed below.
Ethical Approval. CITI Training Certificate ABSTRACT
Ethical Approval. This study was approved by the local ethics committee of research and was performed in adherence to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. For this type of study formal consent is not required.
Ethical Approval. This study was approved by the International Islamic University Malaysia Research Ethics Committee (IREC) (IREC 2018-079) on 13th April 2018 prior to commencement of the study.
Ethical Approval. ‌ This study was approved by the North of Scotland Research Ethics Service (NRES) Committee foundation in October 2016 (16/NS/0116), the Health Research Authority NHS (IRAS Project ID:199100) on 21st January 2017 and finally, the confirmation of capacity and capability to conduct research at Guy’s and St Xxxxxx’ NHS Foundation Trust (GSTFT) was granted in February 2017. All participants enrolled in the study gave informed consent and signed appropriate documentation to this effect. All volunteer samples for this study were obtained from the Special Care Dental Unit at Guy’s Dental Hospital, London, UK.
Ethical Approval. CITI Training Certificate ACKNOWLEDGMENT ABSTRACT TABLE OF CONTENTS
Ethical Approval. Ethical approval to conduct an ND study may be at least as difficult to obtain as legal approval. Ethical approval is necessarily challenging since it aims to meet all of the personal security and privacy needs of the participants. This may well involve going above and beyond the legal requirements with the need to be handled through the de- velopment of a well thought-out protocol specific to the study being undertaken. In many countries and in many organisations there are strict procedures for ethical ap- proval and human subject review. It has to be noted that these procedures can be very time-consuming. Human rights legislation is also relevant, as is the Helsinki Declaration which was adopted by the World Medical Assembly in 1964. Since then, the Declara- tion has been revised several times and the latest version dates from 2008. The Hel- sinki declaration among other things describes the right of the individual to be informed and provide prior consent (see Section 7.2) and states that the protection and rights of the individual go beyond any interests of scientific progress.