Hypotheses. We expected to find an association between preference and friendship quality and that this association would be mediated by empathy and prosocial behavior, since previous studies have found these three constructs to be related. When distinguishing actor and partner effects, we expected an actor effect of preference on a more positive percep- tion of the friendship by the actor, due to more empathy and more prosocial behavior of the actor. For both preference and popularity we expected partner effects. For preference as a predictor, we expected these effects to be explained
Hypotheses. It was hypothesised that in response to an amusing and sad filmclip: 1) participants with AN would exhibit altered emotion facial expression and self reported emotion compared to BN and HC participants 2) BN patients would exhibit some facial expression and self reported emotion alterations compared to HC but not as severe as AN 3) both groups would use aberrant methods of emotion regulation, as measured by the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (Xxxxx & Xxxx, 2003), which would be associated with altered facial expression.
Hypotheses. The present study examined facial expression, subjective experience and SC in a subsample of participants described in chapter 35. Assuming that the findings in the subgroup would be the same with regards to facial emotion expression and subjective experience as in the full sample, it was hypothesised that 1) people with AN would show attenuated facial expression and subjective experience to the amusing film clip compared to HC, but similar levels of SC 2) people with AN would show attenuated facial expression, but similar subjective experience and SC to the sad film as HC 3) people with BN would show similar levels of facial expression and subjective experience in response to the amusing and sad film clips as HC but increased SC and 4) emotion regulation strategies would be aberrant in the ED group. Sixty participants took part in the study, AN=20, BN=14, HC=26. As the participants were a subsample of those in Chapter 3, methods of recruitment, inclusion and exclusion criteria were the same as described previously (p. 71).
Hypotheses. Until now we have only analyzed cost differences theoretically without defining which variables are able to measure cost differences. Standard microeconomic theory would assume that labor and capital factor prices, economies of scale and scope, topographic reasons etc. are decisive. It can be supposed that no crucial regional differences for factor prices are given, hence, they could be neglected. The AA “
Hypotheses. As outlined in the previous section, objective and subjective financial knowledge have often been regarded as separate constructs that both are positively related to financial well-being. The relation of both types of knowledge with financial well-being, however, has not received much research attention (Xxxx et al., 2020). In the present study, we add to the existing literature by testing the following first hypothesis: Hypothesis 1 The combination of high objective and high subjective financial knowledge is associated with more financial well-being. Hypothesis 2 Paying bills on time, active saving, covering normal living expenses, making considered purchases, and striving to achieve long-term goals are associated with more financial well-being.
Hypotheses. Hypotheses concerned the applicability of the cognitive model of caregiving to parent-child relationships in a group of clinically referred children, and the association of family environment with child difficulties, both in general, and specifically in relation to PLE severity. The primary hypothesis to be tested was whether there was an association between parent- child relationships and parental affective disturbance. The second set of hypotheses concerned the processes underlying this association, firstly the association of parental appraisals, coping and social support with parental distress, and secondly their association with EE. The final set of hypotheses investigated the association of parental affective disturbance, EE, and mediating psychological processes, with severity of child difficulties, both in general and specifically severity of PLEs. Both parent and child ratings were considered. Parents who report high EE will have significantly higher levels of anxiety and depression, than those who report Low EE. Parent affective disturbance will be associated with more threatening parent illness appraisals, maladaptive coping strategies and lower levels of social support. The extent to which psychosocial variables are predictive of the parent-child relationship will also be investigated, in line with the Cognitive Model of Caregiving outlined in Figure 2. Figure 2: Hypothesised relationships between parent variables (based on Xxxxxxx et al., 2010). Italicised font= Cognitive Model of Caregiving; Bold font= Current variable of interest. Increased child difficulties will be associated with increased parent affective disturbance, more threatening appraisals, less adaptive coping, lower levels of available social support, and greater likelihood of high EE in the parent-child relationship.
Hypotheses. In the present study, I considered relationship maintenance to be a type of supportive communication. According to Xxxxx and Xxxxxx (2002, 2006), supportive communication promotes democratic decision making. Therefore, I argue that relationship maintenance promotes democratic (i.e., joint) decision making in romantic dyads:
Hypotheses. The Pittsburgh Supersite Program was designed to test a wide range of complementary hypotheses. The findings of the program provided strong support for some of these hypotheses and showed that some of them were false. A brief summary of the original hypotheses is presented below:
Hypotheses. The level of agreement in single-gender groups will be higher than that in mixed-gender groups in FtF setting. Hypothesis 1B: Female-only groups will have a higher level of agreement than male- only groups and mixed-gender groups in CMC setting. DV Group setting IV (Gender composition) IV (Gender composition) IV (Gender composition) H 1A Level of agreement Face-to-Face Male-only groups Female-only groups Mixed- gender groups H 1B Level of agreement Computer- Mediated Communication Male-only groups Female-only groups Mixed- gender groups Hypothesis 2A: CMC setting will accentuate the level of agreement in male-only groups compared to that in FtF setting. Hypothesis 2B: CMC setting will accentuate the level of agreement in female-only groups compared to that in FtF setting. Hypothesis 2C: CMC setting will accentuate the level of agreement in mixed-gender groups compared to that in FtF setting. DV Gender composition IV (Group setting) IV ( Group setting) H 2A Level of agreement Male-only groups Face-to-Face Computer- Mediated H 2B Level of agreement Female-only groups Face-to-Face Computer- Mediated H 2C Level of agreement Mixed-gender groups Face-to-Face Computer- Mediated Hypothesis 3A: The level of group attraction in single-gender groups will be higher than that in mixed-gender groups in FtF setting. Hypothesis 3B: Female-only groups will have a higher level of group attraction than male-only groups and mixed-gender groups in CMC setting. DV Group setting IV (Gender composition) IV (Gender composition) IV (Gender composition) H 3A Level of group attraction Face-to-Face Male-only groups Female-only groups Mixed- gender groups H 3B Level of group attraction Computer- Mediated Male-only groups Female-only groups Mixed- gender groups Hypothesis 4A: CMC setting will attenuate the level of group attraction in male-only groups compared to that in FtF. Hypothesis 4B: CMC setting will attenuate the level of group attraction in female-only groups compared to that in FtF. Hypothesis 4C: CMC setting will attenuate the level of group attraction in mixed-gender groups compared to that in FtF. DV Gender composition IV (Setting) IV (Setting) H 4A Level of group attraction Male-only groups Face-to-Face Computer- Mediated H 4B Level of group attraction Female-only groups Face-to-Face Computer- Mediated H 4C Level of group attraction Mixed-gender groups Face-to-Face Computer- Mediated Participants The initial population of this study was everyone who has access to communica...
Hypotheses. The standard game has been extensively studied in the previous literature and so we ‘know’ to expect success rates of around 40-60% (e.g. Xxxxxx and Marks 2000). Our first hypothesis is that success at providing the public good will be similar in the standard game with feedback and vector game. This is a natural assumption given that there are no strategic differences between these three games.
Hypothesis 1: The success rate of providing the public good is the same in the standard, standard with feedback, and vector and vector-S treatments.
Hypothesis 2: The success rate of providing the public good in a full agreement and full agreement-S treatments will be higher than that in the vector and vector-S treatments. Groups will agree to split the cost equally.
