Evaluation and Qualification Criteria. General Provisions
Evaluation and Qualification Criteria. The prices quoted by the Tenderer “shall not” be subject to adjustment during the performance of the Contract. ITT 20.1 The Tender validity period shall be 140 days.
Evaluation and Qualification Criteria. This Section contains the criteria that KPLC shall use to Award a Framework Agreement(s). The criteria and methodology described is to evaluate Tenders and qualify Tenderers. No other factors, methods or criteria shall be used other than specified in this IFT document for the Primary Procurement process.
1. Evaluation of Tenders (ITT 34) 40 2. Criteria to Award a Framework Agreement(s) (ITT 40) 47 3. Post Qualification Criteria (ITT 38) 48
Evaluation and Qualification Criteria insert complementary details if necessary] (a) Deviat ion in Delivery schedule: [ No. If yes insert the adjustment factor in Section III, Evaluation and Qualification Criteria] (b) Deviat ion in payment schedule: [ No. If yes insert the adjustment factor in Section III, Evaluation and Qualification Criteria] (c) the cost of major replacement component, mandatory spare parts, and service: [ No. If yes, insert the Methodology and criteria in Section III, Evaluation and Qualification Criteria] (d) the availability in Kenya of spare parts and after-sales services for the equipment offered in the Tender [ No. If yes, insert the Methodology and criteria in Section III, Evaluation and Qualification Criteria]
Evaluation and Qualification Criteria. This Section specifies the award criteria and methodology to determine which Bidder(s) will be awarded a Framework Agreement(s). The Procuring Agency shall specify in the BDS that the Framework Agreement will be a Multi- Supplier, and Single/Multi-User Framework Agreement.
Evaluation and Qualification Criteria. Other documents required are indicated in the evaluation and qualification criteria. ITT 15.1 Alternative Tenders “shall not be” considered. ITT 15.2 Alternative times for completion “shall not be” permitted. ITT 15.3 Alternative technical solutions shall be permitted for the following parts of the Services: N/A. [If alternative technical solutions are permitted, the evaluation method will be as specified in Section III, Evaluation and Qualification Criteria.]
Evaluation and Qualification Criteria. Tenderers shall be not allowed to quote separate prices for different lots (contracts) and the methodology to determine the lowest tenderer is specified in Section III, Evaluation and Qualification Criteria. F.
Evaluation and Qualification Criteria. 1 Evaluation and contract award Criteria
Evaluation and Qualification Criteria. This Section contains the criteria that the Procuring Agency shall use for award Framework Agreement(s). The criteria and methodology described is to evaluate Bids and qualify Bidders. No other factors, methods or criteria shall be used other than specified in this RFB document for the Primary Procurement process.
Evaluation and Qualification Criteria. This Section specifies the criteria to determine the Lowest Evaluated Tender that would be considered for contract award; that is the tenderer that meets the qualification criteria and whose tender has been determined to be:
a) Substantially responsive to the bidding document, and
b) The lowest evaluated cost. No other criterion shall be added by the Procuring Entity. Some parts of this section may be omitted by the Procuring Entity (and not by a Tenderer) to suit the subject procurement. For example, in some cases evaluation may not include Margin of Preference, so any reference to considerations for Margin of Preference will be omitted. The Procuring Entity will complete the parts of the Criterion only as guided and allowed in this section. For example, if the criterion provides “Post qualification and Contract xxxx” and lists an item that says “Other conditions…….” the Entity shall only include the conditions that are allowed in the Standard Tender Document.
