, Ex Sample Clauses
, Ex. In case of employment by a structure including different departments or institutes, please specify the degree of autonomy between them.
, Ex. Article 75 TEC)
, Ex. KK at 1. The government argues that this constitutes an accord and satisfaction, barring any claims for copyright infringement by 4DD. It claims that the “facts and circumstances giving rise to this particular modification” refers to all instances of alleged over-installation by the government, and because 4DD did not reserve the right to seek compensation for the copies for which it now seeks compensation, then plaintiff’s infringement claims are waived. 4DD presents multiple challenges to the government’s release. It argues that (1) the release does not cover copyright infringement, as it only 27 See id. (discussing repeatedly whether certain types of copies Xx. Xxxxx counts should count as functional copies).
, Ex. If a State employee is doing field work and needs to make an unexpected, unscheduled overnight stay due to safety reasons, said hotel shall offer the State Lodging Per Diem for any available room regardless of booking policy or room allotment.) Abuse of this policy should be reported immediately.
, Ex. A (a certificate constitutes “a beneficial interest in a trust that owns a pool of assets 23 In Ret. Bd. of the Policeman’s Annuity & Benefit Fund of the City of Chicago v. Bank of N.Y. Xxxxxx, No. 11 Civ. 5459, 2012 WL 1108533 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 3, 2012) (“BONY”), the parties “agree[d] that the TIA applies to the mortgage-backed notes issued by the Delaware trust.” Id. at *4 (emphasis added). Although the Trusts are all Delaware statutory trusts, the parties were not able to reach such an agreement here--and defendants make arguments similar to those that the defendants in the BONY action made with respect to the certificates issued by the New York statutory trusts there.
, Ex. A-1.) On August 27, 2009, Raymours removed the case to this Court (Docket No. 1), and filed the pending Motion to Strike Paragraphs 19 and 49 of the Complaint.
, Ex shares shares Canc ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EMPLOYEE'S ISO PLAN : ------------------------ 20-Mar-96 Banks, M. 1,125.0 4.111 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,125.0 0 15-JUL-97 Xxxxxx, S. 3,000.0 10.667 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,500.0 1,500 16-Feb-99 Xxxxxx, S. 2,000.0 9.500 0.0 0.0 0.0 500.0 1,500 28-MAR-94 Xxxxxxxxxx, 1,125.0 2.833 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,125.0 0 G. 28-MAR-95 Xxxxxxxxxx, 2,250.0 3.056 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,250.0 0 G. 29-APR-97 Xxxxxxxxxx, 1,500.0 8.000 0.0 0.0 0.0 750.0 750 G. 20-MAR-96 Xxxx, H. 2,250.0 4.111 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,250.0 0 16-Feb-99 Xxxx, M. 2,000.0 9.500 0.0 0.0 0.0 500.0 1,500 12-JAN-95 Xxxxxxxx, J. 99,000.0 2.222 0.0 0.0 0.0 99,000.0 0 29-APR-97 Xxxxxxxx, J. 30,000.0 8.000 0.0 0.0 0.0 15,000.0 15,000 25-MAR-98 Xxxxxxxx, J. 22,500.0 12.750 0.0 0.0 0.0 11,250.0 11,250 16-Feb-99 Xxxxxxxx, J. 15,000.0 9.500 0.0 0.0 0.0 3,750.0 11,250 29-APR-97 Xxxxx, C. 3,000.0 8.000 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,500.0 1,500 25-MAR-98 Xxxxx, C. 3,000.0 12.750 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,500.0 1,500 16-Feb-99 Xxxxx, C. 2,000.0 9.500 0.0 0.0 0.0 500.0 1,500 00-XXX-00 Xxxxx, D. 1,125.0 4.111 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,125.0 0 15-JUL-97 Xxxxxx, R. 15,000.0 10.667 0.0 0.0 0.0 7,500.0 7,500 25-MAR-98 Xxxxxx, R. 22,500.0 12.750 0.0 0.0 0.0 11,250.0 11,250 16-Feb-99 Xxxxxx, R. 5,000.0 9.500 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,250.0 3,750 28-MAR-95 Xxxxxx, J. 1,125.0 3.056 0.0 0.0 843.8 281.0 0 29-APR-97 Xxxxxx, J. 1,500.0 8.000 0.0 0.0 375.0 375.0 750 16-Feb-99 Xxxxx, X.X. 250,000.0 9.500 0.0 0.0 0.0 250,000.0 0 28-MAR-95 Mignacco, D. 2,250.0 3.056 0.0 0.0 563.0 1,687.0 0 29-APR-97 Mignacco, D. 1,500.0 8.000 0.0 0.0 0.0 750.0 750 16-Feb-99 Mignacco, D. 2,000.0 9.500 0.0 0.0 0.0 500.0 1,500 16-Feb-99 Xxxxxx, L. 2,000.0 9.500 0.0 0.0 0.0 500.0 1,500 20-Mar-96 Ozgowicz, M. 1,125.0 4.111 0.0 0.0 843.0 282.0 0 Options Outstanding at end of period ---------------------------------------------------------- Date of # of Option grant shares Price ---------------------------------------------------------- EMPLOYEE'S ISO PLAN ( QTD >>>>>>) ------------------- 20-Mar-96 1,125.0 4,625.00 15-JUL-97 3,000.0 32,000.00 16-Feb-99 2,000.0 19,000.00 28-MAR-94 1,125.0 3,187.50 28-MAR-95 2,250.0 6,875.00 29-APR-97 1,500.0 12,000.00 20-MAR-96 2,250.0 9,250.00 16-Feb-99 2,000.0 19,000.00 12-JAN-95 99,000.0 220,000.00 29-APR-97 30,000.0 240,000.00 25-MAR-98 22,500.0 286,875.00 16-Feb-99 15,000.0 142,500.00 29-APR-97 3,000.0 24,000.00 25-MAR-98 3,000.0 38,250.00 16-Feb-99 2,000.0 19,000.00 20-MAR-96 1,125.0...
, Ex. 15 at ¶¶163, 172, 185, 197, 206; Ex.16 at ¶¶212, 233, 245, 254.
, Ex. Theod. Xxxxxxx of Alexandria, Excerpta ex Xxxxxxxx Xxxx. Al., Paed. Xxxxxxx of Alexandria, Paedagogus Xxxx. Al., Protr. Xxxxxxx of Alexandria, Protrepticus
, Ex post policy analysis interventions Most active policy areas per project activities indicators are: NFSA 9. PGO NAC 10. TRANS CUST CROSS-CUTTING ISSUES: Human rights, Gender, Accountability and Environment Sustainability.