Expert Decisions Sample Clauses

Expert Decisions. Where this Agreement calls for a matter to be referred to an Expert for determination, the following provisions shall apply: A. The use of the Expert shall be the exclusive remedy of the parties and neither party shall attempt to adjudicate any dispute in any other forum. The decision of the Expert shall be final and binding on the parties and shall not be capable of challenge, whether by arbitration, in court or otherwise; B. Each party shall be entitled to make written submissions to the Expert, and if a party makes any submission it shall also provide a copy to the other party and the other party shall have the right to comment on such submission. The parties shall make available to the Expert all books and records relating to the issue in dispute and shall render to the Expert any assistance requested of the parties. The costs of the Expert and the proceedings shall be borne as directed by the Expert unless otherwise provided for herein. The Expert may direct that such costs be treated as Deductions; C. The Expert shall make its decision with respect to the matter referred for determination by applying the standards applicable to first-class hotels in accordance with the System Standards (including compliance with the requirements of any quality assurance program) and determining whether the matter at issue is necessary to satisfy such standards; and D. The terms of engagement of the Expert shall include an obligation on the part of the Expert to: (i) notify the parties in writing of his decision within forty-five (45) days from the date on which the Expert has been selected (or such other period as the parties may agree or as set forth herein); and (ii) establish a timetable for the making of submissions and replies.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (12)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Expert Decisions. Where this Agreement calls for a matter to be referred to an Expert for determination, the following provisions shall apply: A. The use of the Expert shall be the exclusive remedy of the parties and neither party shall attempt to adjudicate any dispute in any other forum. The decision of the Expert shall be final and binding on the parties and shall not be capable of challenge, whether by arbitration, in court or otherwise; B. Each party shall be entitled to make written submissions to the Expert, and if a party makes any submission it shall also provide a copy to the other party and the other party shall have the right to comment on such submission. The parties shall make available to the Expert all books and records relating to the issue in dispute and shall render to the Expert any assistance requested of the parties. The costs of the Expert and the proceedings shall be borne as directed by the Expert unless otherwise provided for herein. The Expert may direct that such costs be treated as Deductions; C. With respect to any matter referred to the Expert for determination under Section 7.02D, the Expert shall make its decision by applying the standards applicable to hotels in accordance with the System standards (including compliance with the requirements of any quality assurance program) and determining whether the matter at issue is necessary to satisfy such standards; and D. The terms of engagement of the Expert shall include an obligation on the part of the Expert to: (i) notify the parties in writing of his decision within forty-five (45) days from the date on which the Expert has been selected (or such other period as the parties may agree or as set forth herein); and (ii) establish a timetable for the making of submissions and replies. END OF ARTICLE XIX 80
Sample 1See All (4)
Expert Decisions. Where this Agreement calls for a matter or dispute to be referred to an Expert for determination, the following provisions shall apply, to the exclusion of any other dispute resolution mechanism (whether or not the specific reference to Expert resolution mentions such exclusion): 16.11.1 The “Expert” shall be an independent, nationally recognized senior housing consulting firm or individual who is qualified to resolve the issue in question, and who is appointed in each instance by agreement of the parties or, failing agreement, each party shall select one (1) such nationally recognized consulting firm or individual and the two (2) respective firms and/or individuals so selected shall select another such nationally recognized consulting firm or individual to be the Expert. Each party agrees that it shall not appoint an individual as an Expert hereunder if the individual is, as of the date of appointment or within four (4) years prior to such date, employed by such party or any of its Affiliates, either directly or as a consultant, in connection with any other matter (other than as an expert or arbitrator in connection with any dispute to which such party is involved, including as an Expert hereunder). In the event that either party calls for an Expert determination pursuant to the terms hereof, the parties shall have ten (10) days from the date of such request to agree upon Portions of this exhibit that have been marked by [***] have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. an Expert and, if they fail to agree, each party shall have an additional ten (10) days to make its respective selection of a firm or individual, and within ten (10) days of such respective selections, the two (2) respective firms and/or individuals so selected shall select another such nationally recognized consulting firm or individual to be the Expert. If either party fails to make its respective selection of a firm or individual within the ten (10) day period provided for above, then the other party’s selection shall be the Expert. Also, if the two (2) respective firms and/or individuals so selected shall fail to select a third nationally recognized consulting firm or individual to be the Expert, then such Expert shall be appointed by the United States District Court for the District of Delaware or, in the case of claims over which the federal courts do not have jurisdiction, the Delaware Chancery Cour...
Sample 1Sample 2
Expert Decisions. 21.1 This Clause 21 applies to matters which under this Agreement are expressly required to be dealt with by this Clause in the event that the Purchaser and the Contractor are unable to agree them (namely:- Clauses 7, 8, 18, and 24). Any such matter shall be determined by a person agreed by the parties or, in default of agreement, nominated at the request of either the Purchaser or the Contractor by Institute of Engineering in Hong Kong ("Expert") whose decision (acting as an expert and not as an arbitrator) shall be final and binding on the parties for the purpose of this Agreement . The costs of the Expert shall be shared equally by the Purchaser and the Contractor. the Purchaser and the Contractor shall provide the Expert with such information as the Expert may reasonably require.
Sample 1Sample 2
Expert Decisions. Where this Agreement calls for a matter to be referred to arbitration or an Expert for determination, the following provisions shall apply: A. Unless specifically stated to the contrary, the use of the Expert shall be the exclusive remedy of the parties and neither party shall attempt to adjudicate any dispute in any other forum. The decision of the Expert shall be final and binding on the parties and shall not be capable of challenge, whether by arbitration, in court or otherwise; B. Each party shall be entitled to make written submissions to the Expert, and if a party makes any submission it shall also provide a copy to the other party and the other party shall have the right to comment on such submission. The parties shall make available to the Expert all books and records relating to the issue in dispute and shall render to the Expert any assistance requested of the parties. The costs of the Expert and the proceedings shall be treated as Property Expense(s); C. The Expert shall make its decision with respect to the matter referred for determination by applying the standards applicable to first-class continuing care retirement communities and determining whether the matter at issue is necessary to satisfy such standards; and D. The terms of engagement of the Expert shall include an obligation on the part of the Expert to: (i) notify the parties in writing of his decision within forty-five (45) Days from the date on which the Expert has been selected (or such other period as the parties may agree or as set forth herein); and (ii) establish a timetable for the making of submissions and replies.
Sample 1Sample 2
Expert Decisions. 13.7.1 In the event any party calls for an Expert determination pursuant to the terms hereof, the parties shall have ten (10) days from the date of such request to mutually agree on one (1) Expert. If they fail to agree, each party shall have an additional ten (10) days to each select one (1) Expert, and within ten (10) days of such respective selections, the two (2) Experts shall select a third (3rd) Expert to resolve the dispute. If either party fails to select an Expert within the ten (10) day period provided above, then the other party’s selection shall be the Expert to resolve the dispute. Also, if the two (2) Experts selected fail to select a third (3rd) to be the Expert to resolve the dispute, then such third (3rd) Expert shall be appointed by International Centre for Expertise in accordance with the provisions for the appointment of experts under the Rules for Expertise of the International Chamber of Commerce upon the request of either party and shall be a qualified person having at least ten (10) years recent professional experience as to the subject matter in question.
Sample 1
Expert Decisions. 52 ARTICLE 20 MISCELLANEOUS.........................................................................................53 20.1 Limitation on Payment of Rent...........................................................................53
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Expert Decisions. In case Buyer and Sellers reach no Base EBITDA Agreement or no Compound EBITDA Agreement (i) on or before November 14, 2004 regarding the Base EBITDA or (ii) on or before November 14, 2006 regarding the Compound EBITDA SPA
Sample 1

Related to Expert Decisions

  • Arbitration Decisions Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the arbitrator(s) shall render a decision within ninety (90) Calendar Days of appointment and shall notify the Parties in writing of such decision and the reasons therefor. The arbitrator(s) shall be authorized only to interpret and apply the provisions of this LGIA and shall have no power to modify or change any provision of this Agreement in any manner. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrator(s) may be appealed solely on the grounds that the conduct of the arbitrator(s), or the decision itself, violated the standards set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. The final decision of the arbitrator(s) must also be filed with FERC if it affects jurisdictional rates, terms and conditions of service, Interconnection Facilities, or Network Upgrades.

  • Review by the Association of Procurement Decisions The Procurement Plan shall set forth those contracts which shall be subject to the Association’s Prior Review. All other contracts shall be subject to Post Review by the Association.

  • Claim Decision Upon receipt of such claim, the Plan Administrator shall respond to such claimant within ninety (90) days after receiving the claim. If the Plan Administrator determines that special circumstances require additional time for processing the claim, the Plan Administrator can extend the response period by an additional ninety (90) days for reasonable cause by notifying the claimant in writing, prior to the end of the initial ninety (90) day period, that an additional period is required. The notice of extension must set forth the special circumstances and the date by which the Plan Administrator expects to render its decision. If the claim is denied in whole or in part, the Plan Administrator shall notify the claimant in writing of such denial. The Plan Administrator shall write the notification in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant. The notification shall set forth: (i) The specific reasons for the denial; (ii) The specific reference to pertinent provisions of the Agreement on which the denial is based; (iii) A description of any additional information or material necessary for the claimant to perfect the claim and an explanation of why such material or information is necessary; (iv) Appropriate information as to the steps to be taken if the claimant wishes to submit the claim for review and the time limits applicable to such procedures; and (v) A statement of the claimant’s right to bring a civil action under ERISA Section 502(a) following an adverse benefit determination on review.

  • Credit Decisions Each Lender acknowledges that it has, independently of the Administrative Agent and each other Lender, and based on such Lender’s review of the financial information of the Borrower, the Loan Documents (the terms and provisions of which being satisfactory to such Lender) and such other documents, information and investigations as such Lender has deemed appropriate, made its own credit decision to extend its Commitments. Each Lender also acknowledges that it will, independently of the Administrative Agent and each other Lender, and based on such other documents, information and investigations as it shall deem appropriate at any time, continue to make its own credit decisions as to exercising or not exercising from time to time any rights and privileges available to it under the Loan Documents.

  • Investment Decisions The Subadviser shall determine from time to time what investments and securities will be purchased, retained, sold or loaned by the Series, and what portion of such assets will be invested or held uninvested as cash.

  • Arbitration Decision The arbitrator’s decision will be final and binding. The arbitrator shall issue a written arbitration decision revealing the essential findings and conclusions upon which the decision and/or award is based. A party’s right to appeal the decision is limited to grounds provided under applicable federal or state law.

  • Major Decisions (A) Subject to Sections 7.3(C) and 7.3(D) with respect to the Company, all major decisions of the Company set forth below in clauses (A)(1) through (A)(6) (“Major Decisions”) shall be subject to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation and joint approval by the Advisor and Sub-advisor. For the avoidance of doubt, Major Decisions specifically exclude any decisions regarding the day-to-day operations of the Company, the decision-making authority for which has been delegated to the Sub-advisor pursuant to this Agreement. Major Decisions shall consist of the following: (1) Decisions to recommend to the Board of Directors that the Company acquire or sell Properties, Loans and other Permitted Investments; (2) Retention of investment banks for the Company; (3) Marketing methods for the Company’s sale of Shares; (4) Extending, initiating or terminating the Initial Public Offering or any subsequent Offering of the Shares; (5) Issuing press releases involving the major decisions of the Company or the Advisor or Sub-advisor or their Affiliates with respect to the business or operations of the Company; provided, that the Sub-advisor need not obtain consent to any press releases regarding acquisitions or dispositions of Properties, Loans or other Permitted Investments; and provided further, however, that notwithstanding the immediately preceding proviso, any mention of the Advisor or its Affiliates in such press releases regarding acquisitions or dispositions shall be pre-approved by the Advisor; and (6) Merging or otherwise engaging in any change of control transaction for the Company. (B) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, if the Parties do not agree to any action constituting a Major Decision that is described in any of clauses (A)(2) through (A)(6) above and that has been proposed by either Party, the Parties shall meet (in person or by phone) to discuss the issue in dispute in good faith over the five-business day period beginning with the delivery of notice of the proposed action to the other Party. (C) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, with respect to Major Decisions described in clause (A)(1) above (but subject to Section 7.3(D)), (1) joint approval shall not be required, (2) the Sub-advisor and the Advisor shall discuss the proposed transaction (either in person or by phone) prior to either Party making any recommendation of the proposed transaction to the Board of Directors, and (3) the Sub-Advisor and the Advisor shall each give due consideration to the opinions of the other Party. Ordinarily, such discussions shall begin at least five business days before a recommendation is made to the Board of Directors; however, if in the sole discretion of the Sub-advisor it is in the best interest of the Company to make a recommendation to the Board of Directors more promptly, then the Sub-advisor may do so. In the event the Parties do not agree as to whether to recommend the proposed transaction to the Board of Directors, the Sub-advisor’s decision shall govern. (D) Notwithstanding the provisions of this Section 7.3 or any other provision in this Agreement to the contrary, in all events, including Major Decisions, the Company will be managed under the direction of the Board of Directors. (E) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary (but subject to Section 7.3(D)), the Sub-advisor shall have sole authority to act on behalf of the Company regarding amending the Advisory Agreement.

  • Review by the Bank of Procurement Decisions The Procurement Plan shall set forth those contracts which shall be subject to the Bank’s Prior Review. All other contracts shall be subject to Post Review by the Bank.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 11. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!