External Quality Review Contractor Sample Clauses

External Quality Review Contractor a. The County must assist the Department and the external quality review organization under contract with the Department in completing all County reviews in accordance with protocols found as part of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (BBA). These protocols guide the external, independent review of the quality outcomes and timeliness of, and access to, services provided by the County under this contract. b. The County must assist the Department and the external quality review organization under contract with the Department in identification of provider and member information required to carry out annual, external independent reviews of access, timeliness and quality outcomes based on on-site or off-site reviews. This includes arranging orientation meetings for physician office staff concerning medical chart review, and encouraging attendance at these meetings by County and physician office staff as necessary. The provider of service may elect to have charts reviewed on-site or off-site. c. The purposes of the EQRO review are: 1) To validate data and information including performance measures submitted by the counties to the DHCAA for the purpose of quality assessment. Validation may include the review of information, data, and procedures to determine the extent to which they are accurate, reliable, free from bias, and in accord with standards for data collection and analysis. 2) To validate County Performance Improvement Projects (PIPs) to ensure that PIPs are designed, conducted and reported in a methodologically sound manner. 3) To review compliance with structural and operation standards established by the state. 4) To provide DHCAA and the County with information about their performance that is not available from other sources of data. 5) To provide information that will aid DHCAA and the County in interpreting other sources of data, such as encounter data. 6) To provide insight and information about factors that influenced differences in program performance among similar populations. 7) To provide information that is useful to programs for their ongoing quality improvement processes. 8) To provide information that will be useful to DHCAA in fulfilling its oversight role for developing the County’s contract requirements. d. When the external quality review organization under contract with the Department identifies an adverse quality finding that needs to be followed up on, the County must: 1) Assign a staff person(s) to conduct follow-up with the provider...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
External Quality Review Contractor. 1. The HMO must assist the Department and the external quality review organization under contract with the Department in identification of provider and enrollee information required to carry out on-site or off-site medical chart reviews. This includes arranging orientation meetings for HMO Contract for February 1, 2006 - December 31, 2007 physician office staff concerning medical chart review, and encouraging attendance at these meetings by HMO and physician office staff as necessary. The provider of service may elect to have charts reviewed on-site or off-site. 2. When the professional review organization under contract with the Department identifies an adverse health situation in which follow-up is needed to determine whether appropriate care was provided, the HMO must: a. Assign a staff person(s) to conduct follow-up with the provider(s) concerning each adverse health situation identified by the Department’s external quality review organization, including informing the provider(s) of the finding and monitoring the provider’s resolution of the finding; b. Inform the HMO’s QAPI Committee of the final finding and involve the QAPI Committee in the development, implementation and monitoring of the corrective action plan; and c. Submit a corrective action plan or an opinion in writing to the Department within 60 days that addresses the measures that the HMO and the provider intend to take to resolve the finding. The HMO’s final resolution of all cases must be completed within six months of HMO notification. A case is not considered resolved by the Department until the Department approves the response provided by the HMO and provider. 3. The HMO will facilitate training provided by the Department to its providers.
External Quality Review Contractor. 1. The HMO must assist the Department and the external quality review organization under contract with the Department in identification of provider and enrollee information required to carry out on-site or off-site medical chart reviews. This includes arranging orientation meetings for physician office staff concerning medical chart review, and encouraging attendance at these meetings by HMO and physician office staff as necessary. The provider of service may elect to have charts reviewed on-site or off-site. 2. When the professional review organization under contract with the Department identifies an adverse health situation in which follow-up is needed to determine whether appropriate care was provided, the HMO must: a. Assign a staff person(s) to conduct follow-up with the provider(s) concerning each adverse health situation identified by the Department’s external quality review organization, including informing the provider(s) of the finding and monitoring the provider’s resolution of the finding; b. Inform the HMO’s QAPI Committee of the final finding and involve the QAPI Committee in the development, implementation and monitoring of the corrective action plan; and c. Submit a corrective action plan or an opinion in writing to the Department within 60 days that addresses the measures that the HMO and the provider intend to take to resolve the finding. The HMO’s final resolution of all cases must be completed within six months of HMO notification. A case is not considered resolved by the Department until the Department approves the response provided by the HMO and provider. 3. The HMO will facilitate training provided by the Department to its providers.
External Quality Review Contractor a. The HMO must assist the Department and the external quality review organization under contract with the Department in identification of provider and enrollee information required to carry out on-site or off-site medical chart reviews. This includes arranging orientation meetings for physician office staff concerning medical chart review, and encouraging attendance at these meetings by HMO and physician office staff as necessary. The provider of service may elect to have charts reviewed on-site or off-site. b. When the professional review organization under contract with the Department identifies an adverse health situation in which follow-up is needed to determine whether appropriate care was provided, the HMO will be responsible for the following tasks: 1) Assign a staff person(s) to conduct follow-up with the provider(s) concerning each adverse health situation identified by the Department's professional review organization, including informing the provider(s) of the finding and monitoring the provider's resolution of the finding; HMO Contract for January 1, 2002 - December 31, 2003 2) Inform the HMO's QAPI Committee of the final finding and involve the QAPI Committee in the development, implementation and monitoring of the corrective action plan; and 3) Submit a corrective action plan or an opinion in writing to the Department within 60 days that addresses the measures that the HMO and the provider intend to take to resolve the finding. The HMO's final resolution of all cases must be completed within six (6) months of HMO notification. A case is not considered resolved by the Department until the Department approves the response provided by the HMO and provider. c. The HMO will facilitate training provided by the Department to its providers.

Related to External Quality Review Contractor

  • COUNTY’S QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN The County or its agent will evaluate the Contractor’s performance under this Contract on not less than an annual basis. Such evaluation will include assessing the Contractor’s compliance with all Contract terms and conditions and performance standards. Contractor deficiencies which the County determines are severe or continuing and that may place performance of the Contract in jeopardy if not corrected will be reported to the Board of Supervisors. The report will include improvement/corrective action measures taken by the County and the Contractor. If improvement does not occur consistent with the corrective action measures, the County may terminate this Contract or impose other penalties as specified in this Contract.

  • Quality Assurance/Quality Control Contractor shall establish and maintain a quality assurance/quality control program which shall include procedures for continuous control of all construction and comprehensive inspection and testing of all items of Work, including any Work performed by Subcontractors, so as to ensure complete conformance to the Contract with respect to materials, workmanship, construction, finish, functional performance, and identification. The program established by Contractor shall comply with any quality assurance/quality control requirements incorporated in the Contract.

  • Quality Assurance Program An employee shall be entitled to leave of absence without loss of earnings from her or his regularly scheduled working hours for the purpose of writing examinations required by the College of Nurses of Ontario arising out of the Quality Assurance Program.

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards. 2. Grantee agrees to cooperate fully and provide the System Agency and its representatives timely access to Products, records, and other items and information needed to conduct such review, evaluation, testing, and monitoring.

  • Quality Assurance The parties endorse the underlying principles of the Company’s Quality Management System, which seeks to ensure that its services are provided in a manner which best conforms to the requirements of the contract with its customer. This requires the Company to establish and maintain, implement, train and continuously improve its procedures and processes, and the employees to follow the procedures, document their compliance and participate in the improvement process. In particular, this will require employees to regularly and reliably fill out documentation and checklists to signify that work has been carried out in accordance with the customer’s specific requirements. Where necessary, training will be provided in these activities.

  • PRIME CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITY The contractor will be required to assume prime contractor responsibility for the contract and will be the sole point of contact with regard to all commodities, services and support. The prime contractor may delegate facilitation of contract orders to their “Authorized/Certified Dealers” only. This delegation will in no way relieve the contractor of any contractual obligations set forth in this Contract Award.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Quality Management System Supplier hereby undertakes, warrants and confirms, and will ensue same for its subcontractors, to remain certified in accordance with ISO 9001 standard or equivalent. At any time during the term of this Agreement, the Supplier shall, if so instructed by ISR, provide evidence of such certifications. In any event, Supplier must notify ISR, in writing, in the event said certification is suspended and/or canceled and/or not continued.

  • Money Market Fund Compliance Testing and Reporting Services Subject to the authorization and direction of the Trust and, in each case where appropriate, the review and comment by the Trust’s independent accountants and legal counsel, and in accordance with procedures that may be established from time to time between the Trust and the Administrator, the Administrator will:

  • Synchronization, Commissioning and Commercial Operation 4.1.1 The Power Producer shall give at least fifteen (15) days written notice to the SLDC / ALDC / DISCOM as the case may be, of the date on which it intends to synchronize the Power Project to the Grid System. 4.1.2 Subject to Article 4.1.1, the Power Project may be synchronized by the Power Producer to the Grid System when it meets all the connection conditions prescribed in the Grid Code and otherwise meets all other Indian legal requirements for synchronization to the Grid System. 4.1.3 The synchronization equipment and all necessary arrangements / equipment including Remote Terminal Unit (RTU) for scheduling of power generated from the Project and transmission of data to the concerned authority as per applicable regulation shall be installed by the Power Producer at its generation facility of the Power Project at its own cost. The Power Producer shall synchronize its system with the Grid System only after the approval of GETCO / SLDC / ALDC and GEDA. 4.1.4 The Power Producer shall immediately after each synchronization / tripping of generator, inform the sub-station of the Grid System to which the Power Project is electrically connected in accordance with applicable Grid Code. 4.1.5 The Power Producer shall commission the Project within SCOD. 4.1.6 The Power Producer shall be required to obtain Developer and/ or Transfer Permission, Key Plan drawing etc, if required, from GEDA. In cases of conversion of land from Agricultural to Non-Agriculture, the commissioning shall be taken up by GEDA only upon submission of N.A. permission by the Power Producer. 4.1.7 The Power Producer shall be required to follow the Forecasting and Scheduling procedures as per the Regulations issued by Hon’ble GERC from time to time. It is to clarify that in terms of GERC (Forecasting, Scheduling, Deviation Settlement and Related Matters of Solar and Wind Generation Sources) Regulations, 2019 the procedures for Forecasting, Scheduling & Deviation Settlment are applicable to all solar generators having combined installed capacity above 1 MW connected to the State Grid / Substation including those connected via pooling stations.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!