Facts of the Case Sample Clauses

Facts of the Case. The grievant was employed on March 10, 1975, as an unscheduled, temporary, part-time Clerk D in the Customer Services Department. Subsequent to this, she submitted transfer applications to various full-time clerical jobs. In order to qualify herself for consideration to the position of Clerk D-Typist (now Utility Clerk-Typist), on February 2, 1978, she took and passed the required typing test. In May 1980 the grievant was the senior transfer applicant for a position of Utility Clerk-Typist in Xxxxxx District, Sacramento Division. Prior to being awarded this job, the grievant was notified by Company that she would have to requalify her typing skill level. The grievant requested and received a one week's delay in taking the test as she felt a need to brush up her typing skill which had not been utilized in her work as Cashier in the Customer Services Department. When the grievant retook the typing test on May 14, 1980, she failed to achieve a passing grade and was bypassed for the vacant position. The Union filed a grievance contending that Company had no right to require a retest of the grievant's typing skills and that once the grievant had qualified for the job in question, she remained qualified.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Facts of the Case. Effective January 1, 2011, the parties agreed through General Negotiations to the establishment of a new beginner’s level classification: Service Representative I. The wage rate schedule for the classification consists of four steps: Start, 18 months, 3-year, and 54 months. Employees hired into this classification were placed at the starting wage step. The Clerical Hiring Rate Guidelines of Exhibit A provide for the hiring of employees withdirectly related clerical job experience” at other than the starting wage rate for certain entry level classifications. When the Service Representative I classification was negotiated, the parties agreed that the Hiring Guidelines were applicable. At the time this grievance was filed, the Contact Center management was defining “directly related clerical job experience” as having held the Customer Services Representative classification at PG&E within the previous 12 months, and with at least 18 months of PG&E Contact Center work experience. Only individuals who met these criteria would be placed at the 18 month wage step.
Facts of the Case. 4.1 The applicant company, registered under provisions of the GST Act, engaged in providing manpower supply services based on requirement of the customers and contracts awarded. The applicant submitted that they had been awarded contract for supply of manpower, on acceptance of their tender by Karnataka State Rural Development and Panchayat Raj University, Gadag, Karnataka and consequently the applicant entered into an agreement. They also provide similar services to Karnataka State Warehouse Corporation, under the following terms and conditions. 4.2 The applicant agreed to comply with all the labor laws, rules and Acts in relation to its workers and ensure payment of minimum wages to the workers engaged to provide the said services on outsourcing basis, as per the notifications issued by the Government of Karnataka. 4.3 The applicant shall deposit the EST/PF contributions of the workers to the appropriate authority as per the rules and shall pay such taxes duties fees and other impositions as may be levied under the Applicable Law, the amount of which is deemed to have been included in the contract price. 4.4 The University shall pay the service charges to the Applicant at the rate of 2% in addition to the wages of their employees, so as the applicant shall not deduct any amount from the wages.
Facts of the Case. Xxxxxx Glass, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Schott group (German origin), is a manufacturer of Neutral USP-1 borosilicate glass tubes having unique properties (such as low thermal expansion co-efficient and highly resistant to chemical reaction), therefore are used to make glass ampoules, vials, cartridges, syringes, which *M/x. Xxxxxx Glass India Pvt. Ltd.vs CCI & Ors., decided by COMPAT available at xxxx://xxx.xxxxxx.xxx.xx/upload/PDFs/aprilordersApp2014/02_0 4_14.pdf and Kapoor Glass Pvt. Ltd. vs Xxxxxx Glass India Pvt. Ltd., decided by CCI available at xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx.xx/May2011/OrderOfCommission/Case22of201 0MainOrder.pdf last accessed on 28th July 2014 1 Hereinafter referred to as ‘CCI’. 2 Hereinafter referred to as ‘COMPAT’. 3 Hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’. are used as packaging material for liquid injectables and drugs by the pharmaceutical industry. These glass tubes conform to the needs of the pharmaceutical companies. Kapoor Glass was the informant before the CCI wherein it alleged Xxxxxx Glass of anti-competitive practices, such as – (a) practices affecting the state of competition in the market for Neutral USP Type I Borosilicate Glass Tubes in India and (b) practices affecting the state of competition in market for downstream product of glass ampoules and other containers. Xxxxxx Glass and Nipro Glass India were the only two companies producing ‘neutral USP-I borosilicate glass tubes’ in India. Here, Xxxxxx Glass was alleged of engaging in anti-competitive practices such as offering discounts in lieu of bank guarantee of Rs.70 lacs from ampoules manufacturers. Further, it was alleged of forcing upon some anti-competitive agreements to the Converters. Application was filed regarding infringement of section 4(2)(a),4(2)(e),3(4), and sought reliefs under section 27 & 33 of the Act. The CCI after finding a prima facie case directed the DG to investigate the matter. The DG’s report stated that the unique characteristics of the glass manufactured by Xxxxxx Glass made it non- substitutable. DG took the territory of India as the relevant geographical market and categorised relevant product market broadly into two, (a) Market for 'Neutral Clear USP-I borosilicate Glass Tubes' (NGC) and (b) Market for 'Neutral Amber USP-I Borosilicate Glass Tubes' (NGA). The CCI found Schott Glass guilty of contravening section 4 of the Act and imposed a penalty of Rs. 5.66 crore (INR 56.6 mn) with a cease and desist order. The CCI ordered to cease and des...

Related to Facts of the Case

  • Liabilities of the Company Except as stated in this Section 8, the Company shall have no liability for damages of any kind arising out of or related to events, acts, rights or privileges contemplated in this Agreement. a. The liability of the Company for damages resulting in whole or in part from or arising in connection with the furnishing of Service under this Agreement including, but not limited to, mistakes, omissions, interruptions, delays, errors or other defects or misrepresentations shall not exceed an amount equal to the charges under this Agreement applicable to the specific call (or portion thereof) that was affected. No other liability shall attach to the Company. b. The Company shall not be liable for any failure of performance hereunder due to causes beyond its control, including, but not limited to: (1) acts of God, fires, flood or other catastrophes; (2) any law, order, regulation, directive, action or request of the United States Government, or any other government, including state and local governments having jurisdiction over the Company, or of any department, agency, bureau, corporation or other instrumentality of any one or more of said governments, or of any civil or military authority; or (3) national emergencies, insurrections, riots, wars or other labor difficulties. c. The Company shall not be liable for any act or omission of any other entity furnishing facilities, equipment, or services used by a Customer, with the Company's Services. In addition, the Company shall not be liable for any damages or losses due to the failure or negligence of any customer or due to the failure of customer provided equipment, facilities or services.

  • Liabilities of the Manager A. In the absence of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of obligations or duties hereunder on the part of the Manager, the Manager shall not be subject to liability to the Trust or the Fund or to any shareholder of the Fund for any act or omission in the course of, or connected with, rendering services hereunder or for any losses that may be sustained in the purchase, holding or sale of any security by the Fund. B. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Manager agrees to reimburse the Trust for any and all costs, expenses, and counsel and trustees’ fees reasonably incurred by the Trust in the preparation, printing and distribution of proxy statements, amendments to its Registration Statement, holdings of meetings of its shareholders or trustees, the conduct of factual investigations, any legal or administrative proceedings (including any applications for exemptions or determinations by the Securities and Exchange Commission) which the Trust incurs as the result of action or inaction of the Manager or any of its affiliates or any of their officers, directors, employees or stockholders where the action or inaction necessitating such expenditures (i) is directly or indirectly related to any transactions or proposed transaction in the stock or control of the Manager or its affiliates (or litigation related to any pending or proposed or future transaction in such shares or control) which shall have been undertaken without the prior, express approval of the Trust’s Board of Trustees; or, (ii) is within the control of the Manager or any of its affiliates or any of their officers, directors, employees or stockholders. The Manager shall not be obligated pursuant to the provisions of this Subparagraph 7.B., to reimburse the Trust for any expenditures related to the institution of an administrative proceeding or civil litigation by the Trust or a shareholder seeking to recover all or a portion of the proceeds derived by any stockholder of the Manager or any of its affiliates from the sale of his shares of the Manager, or similar matters. So long as this Agreement is in effect, the Manager shall pay to the Trust the amount due for expenses subject to this Subparagraph 7.B. within 30 days after a xxxx or statement has been received by the Manager therefor. This provision shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any claim the Trust may have or may assert against the Manager or others for costs, expenses or damages heretofore incurred by the Trust or for costs, expenses or damages the Trust may hereafter incur which are not reimbursable to it hereunder. C. No provision of this Agreement shall be construed to protect any trustee or officer of the Trust, or director or officer of the Manager, from liability in violation of Sections 17(h) and (i) of the 1940 Act.

  • Responsibilities of the City The City’s Contract Manager will be responsible for exercising general oversight of the Contractor’s activities in completing the Scope of Work. Specifically, the Contract Manager will represent the City’s interests in resolving day-to-day issues that may arise during the term of this Contract, shall participate regularly in conference calls or meetings for status reporting, shall promptly review any written reports submitted by the Contractor, and shall approve all invoices for payment, as appropriate. The City’s Contract Manager shall give the Contractor timely feedback on the acceptability of progress and task reports.

  • LIABILITIES OF THE PARTIES 11.1. The Parties acknowledge that the Seller has a legitimate interest in ensuring prompt payment under the Contract. Should the Buyer breach the terms of payment stipulated in Clause 6 of the Contract and corresponding additional agreements, the Buyer shall pay to the Seller liquidated damages of 0.05% of the amount outstanding per full calendar day of the payment delay. Should the Buyer fail to make 100% payment of Goods cost within 2 days of the time stipulated for payment, the Seller has the right, at its sole discretion, to terminate the Contract by written notice to the Buyer and without further liability upon the Seller. Should the Buyer breach the terms of signing of additional agreements both on provisional price and on final one, and the terms of fulfillment of final settlement, indicated in cl.8.3, the Seller reserves the right at its sole discretion, not to nominate the future Goods lots with further postponement of the delivery or decrease of the whole amount under the current Contract and / or to terminate the Contract without further liability upon the Seller. The Seller and the Buyer are relieved from any responsibility for the partial or complete default of their obligations under the Supply Сontract, if they prove by the documents that proper fulfillment of their obligations became impossible due to shut-down, unscheduled repairs of JSC Naftan OR facilities or due to force-majeure occurrence. The Parties shall bear no responsibility for the failure to properly fulfil their obligations under the Contract by virtue of provisions of law or other laws and regulations (other documents binding for the Seller / consignor) currently in force that prevent the Contract fulfilment, adopted by the respective state authorities or organizations and Belarusian State Concern of Oil and Chemistry (Belneftekhim concern) in particular, in case they were adopted (published) after the Contract signing and directly affect its fulfillment. 11.2. The Parties acknowledge that the Seller has a legitimate interest in ensuring prompt and full loading of the stipulated quantity of Goods and that any failure of the Buyer to load the full quantity of Goods at the time specified in the Contract could cause the Seller significant loss and inconvenience. In particular, the Buyer understands that any such failure may cause the Seller to incur costs including, but not limited to, terminal storage charges, railway demurrage and / or infrastructure charges, and / or vessel demurrage in respect of other vessels. Accordingly, should the Buyer fail to load the full quantity of Goods at the time specified in the Contract: 11.2.1. the final price (Pr(F)) of the Goods shall be increased by 0,05% of the Contract value of the unlifted goods, per full calendar day of delay in lifting; and 11.2.2. the Seller shall have the right, at its sole discretion, to cancel the delivery of the unlifted Goods and / or to terminate the Contract without further liability upon the Seller. 11.2.3. Сompensates to the Seller losses suffered, including, but not limited to the following: charges of the Seller for storage of the Goods in the tanks of the terminal and in tanks of park of Ministry of Railways, charges of the Seller for using an infrastructure of the railways, other connected with this charges including demurrage claims of other vessels. 11.3. The Buyer shall exercise reasonable efforts to ensure that: 11.3.1. for vessels carrying persistent oil products as cargo, the vessel carries on board a certificate of insurance as described in the Civil Liability Convention for Oil Pollution Damage; and 11.3.2. the vessel has in place insurance cover for oil pollution no less in scope and amounts than available under the Rules of P&I Clubs entered into the International Group of P&I Clubs. 11.3.3. the vessel shall comply with the requirements of the International Ship and Port Facility Security Code and the relevant amendments to chapter XI of SOLAS (ISPS Code). 11.4. The Seller shall procure that the loading port/terminal/installation shall comply with the requirements of the International Ship and Port Facility Security Code and the relevant amendments to Chapter XI of SOLAS (ISPS Code).

  • Responsibilities of the District 12.1. The District shall examine the documents submitted by the Architect and shall render decisions so as to avoid unreasonable delay in the process of the Architect’s Services. 12.2. The District shall verbally or in writing advise Architect if the District becomes aware of any fault or defect in the Project, including any errors, omissions or inconsistencies in the Architect’s documents. Failure to provide such notice shall not relieve Architect of its responsibility therefore, if any. 12.3. Unless the District and Architect agree that a hazardous materials consultant shall be a Consultant of the Architect, the District shall furnish the services of a hazardous material consultant or other consultants when such services are requested in writing by Architect and deemed necessary by the District or are requested by the District. These services shall include: asbestos and lead paint survey; abatement documentation; and specifications related to said matters, which are to be incorporated into bid documents prepared by Architect. If the hazardous materials consultant is furnished by the District and is not a Consultant of the Architect, the specifications shall include a note to the effect that the hazardous materials consultant’s specifications are included in the Architect’s bid documents for the District’s convenience and have not been prepared or reviewed by the Architect. The note shall also direct questions about the hazardous materials consultant’s specifications related to asbestos and lead paint survey and/or abatement documentation to the preparer of the hazardous materials consultant’s specifications.

  • Responsibilities of the Company 3.3.1 The Company shall provide participants of CopyTrade with a complete package of services according to the Customer Agreement. The Company is liable for proper performance of technological solutions according to the Customer Agreement. 3.3.2 The Company bears no liability to participants of CopyTrade for lost profit or losses, which may directly or indirectly occur as a result of trading operations performed or not performed by an Investor or a Trader. 3.3.3 The Company bears no liability to participants of CopyTrade for lost profit or losses, which may be directly or indirectly occur as a result of their ignorance of regulatory documents or cooperation scheme. 3.3.4 The Company doesn’t evaluate Traders’ professional skills and suitability not on a single stage of their activity and bears no responsibility to Investors for any losses or lost profit they may incur. 3.3.5 The Company is not liable for:

  • Financial Matters (a) The unaudited balance sheet of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and the related statements of income, stockholders equity and cash flows for the fiscal year period then ended, copies of which have been delivered to the Agent, have been prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (subject to the absence of notes required by Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and to normal year-end adjustments) and fairly present the financial position of the Borrower as of such date and the results of operations of the Borrower for the period covered thereby. (b) Except (i) as fully reflected in the financial statements referred to in subsection (a) above (including the notes thereto, if any), (ii) incurred in the ordinary course of business since the respective dates of such financial statements and (iii) for the obligations of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries under the Credit Documents, neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has any material direct or indirect obligations or liabilities of any kind, whether or not required by Generally Accepted Accounting Principles to be set forth on financial statements. (c) The unaudited consolidated pro forma balance sheet of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 has been delivered to the Agent and appears in the Borrower's Form S-1, filed on April 23, 1998 (the "Pro Forma Balance Sheet"). The Pro Forma Balance Sheet has been prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (subject to the absence of footnotes required by Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and subject to normal year-end adjustments) and, subject to stated assumptions made in good faith and having a reasonable basis set forth therein, presents fairly the consolidated financial position of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries on an unaudited pro forma basis as of the date set forth therein. (d) The Borrower has prepared, and has furnished to the Agent a copy of, consolidated and consolidating pro forma projected statements of income of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries for the three-year period beginning January 1, 1998, prepared on a quarterly basis for fiscal year 1998 and on an annual basis thereafter, giving effect to the consummation of the Credit Documents, the extensions of credit made under this Agreement, the payment of transaction fees and expenses related to the foregoing (the "Projections"). In the opinion of management of the Borrower, the assumptions used in the preparation of the Projections were reasonable when made and continue to be reasonable as of the Amendment Effective Date, subject to the uncertainties and approximations inherent in any projection. The Projections have been prepared in good faith by the executive and financial personnel of the Borrower and represent, as of the Amendment Effective Date, a reasonable estimate of the future performance of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries it being acknowledged by the Agent and the Lenders that these projections as to future events are subject to the uncertainties and estimations inherent in any projections and that actual results during the periods covered by such Projections may differ from the projected results (and that such differences may be material and adverse).

  • Organizational Expenses; Liabilities of the Holders (a) The Servicer shall pay organizational expenses of the Issuer as they may arise. (b) No Certificateholder (including the Seller if the Seller becomes a Certificateholder) shall have any personal liability for any liability or obligation of the Issuer.

  • CORPORATE INTEGRITY OBLIGATIONS Indivior shall establish and maintain a Compliance Program that includes the following elements:

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!