February 2016 Clause Samples

February 2016. For the Government of Iceland For the Farmers’ Association of Iceland

February 2016. The contemplated Offering falls under the capital increases for which the €220,000,000 maximum threshold applies. So far, the Board of directors has not yet used this option the authorised capital granted in January 2016. On the date of this Securities Note the amount by which the Board of Directors could increase the subscribed capital under the authorised capital amounts therefore to €220,000,000 (for capital increases for which the €220,000,000 maximum threshold applies) At the same meeting, the Board also decided - pursuant to article 6.2 of the Issuer's articles of association and the REEC Legislation - to cancel the preferential subscription rights of the Existing Shareholders upon issuance of the Convertible Bonds and to grant a priority allocation right to the Existing Shareholders for the subscription of the Convertible Bonds. Pursuant to the RREC Legislation applicable to the Issuer, the priority allocation right must comply with the following conditions: - it pertains to the total amount of the new securities to be issued; - it is granted to the Existing Shareholders pro rata their stake in the share capital of the Issuer at the launch of the Offering; - the public offer period may not be shorter than three (3) business days; and

February 2016. ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇’▇ presentation on developing a regulatory regime for deep seabed mining discussed the progress made by the International Seabed Authority to articulate a comprehensive legal regime for the exploitation of marine minerals from the seabed beyond national jurisdiction.

February 2016. Česká Spořitelna has been a general partner of the University of Economics, Prague, since 2002. It contributes financially to the development of educational activities, amongst which we can count, inter alia, publishing activities, support for student associations, the promotion of research and development (Days of Science), support for cooperation between foreign and Czech students, as well as social activities such as: Day with the VŠE and the VSE Ball. Cooperation between the CS and the VSE also has a non-financial dimension, such as when experts from the ČS give lectures at the VSE. CS officials also regularly assist with student’s graduation theses, as opponents, or thesis leaders. The ČS will this year, in cooperation with the VŠE, realized the so-called Innovation Day. On this day, teams, composed of bank employees, and students from the xPORT VŠE, as well as from other partner universities, deal with a real business task. In the afternoon, the teams‘ efforts will be adjudicated upon by members of the bank's management, as well as representatives of the University of Economics Prague.

February 2016. During the course of negotiations for the current collective bargaining agreement the Union raised a concern over lost time during the period of the Company inventory. The purpose of this letter is to confirm the commitment of the Company to try to reduce or eliminate lost time. Among the actions being explored by the Company are:

February 2016. KAIZEN Continuous Improvement Process

February 2016. During the course of negotiations, the Union raised the concern that the overtime spread between the lowest and highest employee overtime hours was not taken into consideration when overtime was requested. The Company agreed that overtime should be allocated starting with the applicable employee with the lowest number of hours, subject to the situations where specific employees are required based on needed skills. Another concern is the amount of spread of overtime between shifts. Both parties agreed that it is difficult to balance overtime between shifts. However, where possible, the Company will endeavour to allocate more overtime for the second and third shifts. In conjunction with the above commitment the Company agrees to sit with the Union every 6 months to review the overtime spreads.

February 2016. To the Lead Administrative Agent and the Lenders party on the date hereof to the Credit Agreement referred to below DRAFT January 26, 2016 Re: Intuit Inc. Ladies and Gentlemen: This opinion is furnished to you pursuant to Section 4.01(b) of the Credit Agreement, dated as of the date hereof (the “Credit Agreement”), by and among Intuit Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Borrower” or the “Company”), the Lenders parties thereto and Bank of America, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as co-administrative agents (the “Co- Administrative Agents”) for said Lenders. We have acted as counsel for the Borrower in connection with the Credit Agreement. Unless otherwise defined herein (including but not limited to the Exhibits hereto), terms defined in the Credit Agreement are used herein as therein defined. In rendering this opinion, we have made such legal and factual examinations and inquiries as we have deemed necessary for the purpose of rendering this opinion. We have also assumed that, with respect to factual matters, all the representations and warranties made by the Company in, or pursuant to, the Credit Agreement (other than matters expressly covered in the opinions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 below) are true and complete in all material respects. In our examination of documents for purposes of this opinion, we have assumed, and express no opinion as to, the genuineness of all signatures on original documents, the authenticity and completeness of all documents submitted to us as originals, the conformity to originals and completeness of all documents submitted to us as copies, the lack of any undisclosed termination, modification, waiver or amendment to the Credit Agreement, the legal competence and capacity of all persons or entities executing the same, the good standing of all entities (other than the Company) in the States of the United States in which they were formed and, if required to be qualified to do business in the State of California, in such State, and the due authorization, execution and delivery of the Credit Agreement by the Co-Administrative Agents and the Lenders. For the purposes of this opinion, we have also assumed, without independent investigation, that: (a) the Credit Agreement, along with any related fee letter, reflects the complete understanding and agreement of the parties concerning the subject matter thereof; and (b) the Credit Agreement is a legal, valid and binding obligation of the Co-Administrative Agents and the Lenders,...

February 2016. It is a condition to the Company’s obligation to issue Shares hereunder that the Participant pay to the Company such amount as may be required to satisfy all tax withholding obligations arising in connection with this Award (or otherwise make arrangements acceptable to the Company for the satisfaction of such tax withholding obligations). If the required withholding amount required is not timely paid or satisfied, the Participant’s right to receive such Shares will be permanently forfeited. The Company, in its discretion, may withhold Shares otherwise issuable hereunder in satisfaction of the minimum amount required to be withheld in connection with this Award (based on the Fair Market Value of such Shares on the date of such withholding).