FINDINGS AND ORDER Sample Clauses

FINDINGS AND ORDER. (a) Within five (5) days following the conclusion of the hearing, the Hearing Officer shall make written findings of fact, based upon the evidence received at the hearing to support its decision and shall issue an order affirming, modifying, or overruling the determination or order of the LEA under appeal or the subject of the petition; (b) The decision of the Hearing Officer shall be final and conclusive pursuant to PRC Section 45017. An appeal may be filed with CalRecycle pursuant to PRC Section 45030 then to the Superior Court pursuant to PRC Section 45040; (c) The Secretary shall be charged with the responsibility of providing a copy of the Hearing Officer's decision to the parties. The Secretary shall provide a copy of the decision to the appellant or the petitioner by United States mail or by personal service at the address listed on the appeal or the petition.

FINDINGS AND ORDER. Ju n e 2,1965. Each of the Applicants listed herein nas filed an application pursuant to sec­ tion 7 of the Natural Gas Act for a cer­ tificate of public convenience and ne­ cessity authorizing the sale and delivery oi natural gas in interstate commerce or a Potion to amend an existing certifi­ cate authorization, all as more fully de­ nari in the respective applications and petitions (and any supplements or e v e n t s thereto) which are on file with the Commission. iQS eJ ^ plicants herein have filed re­ nne.? 5*as Rate Schedules and pro­ trae o ° fatiate, add, or delete natural i n r t i w " in interstate commerce as saipe^e(+ « y the tabulation herein. All to nr k^ kheated herein are either equal bv th? n°W ?eiling Prices established ci i Commission’s Statement of Policy whin’b amended> or involve sales for preevviionunslïyrnisiasnuedn.t certificates have been Chase Petroleum Co. (O perator), agent for ▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇, et al., Applicant in Docket No. CI65-941, proposes to con­ tinue in part the sale of natural gas heretofore authorized in Docket No. G-13558 and made pursuant to the Estate of K ▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, et al., PPC Gas Rate Schedule No. 3. Applicant has filed the contract, as supplemented, compris­ ing said rate schedule as its own rate schedule. On December 10, 1959, K ay ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ Oil Properties, et al., predecessor in interest to the Estate o f K ▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, et al., filed with the Commission a notice of change in rate under its FPC Gas Rate Schedule No. 3. By order issued January 6, 1960, in Docket No. G-205381 the Commission suspended the proposed change until June 10, 1960, and there­ after until made effective. The change was designated as Supplement No. 1 to the rate schedule. On March 22 and March 29,1965, Applicant filed a motion and agreement and undertaking in Docket No. G-20538 to be made co-re­ spondent and to make the change in rate effective. Accordingly, Applicant will be made a co-respondent in said proceeding, the proceeding will be redesignated, the change in rate will be made effective as of March 22, 1965, insofar as it is appli­ cable to sales by Applicant from the acreage acquired from the Estate o f K ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and the agreement and under­ taking will be accepted for filing. 1Consolidated w ith Docket No. AR61-1, et al. respective Applicants, together with the construction and operation o f any fa ­ cilities subject to the jurisdiction o f the Commission necessary therefor, are re­ quired by the public convenience and necessi...

FINDINGS AND ORDER. The Court finds that the Settlement Agreement is fair, reasonable, and adequate and warrants final approval under the applicable Rule 23 and Fourth Circuit factors. 1. With respect to the adequacy and experience of counsel, Class Counsel and Carrington’s Counsel are experienced in class action litigation. Moreover, it appears to the Court that the Class Representatives and Class Counsel have adequately represented the proposed Settlement Class. Class Counsel are experienced and sophisticated, with years of experience in complex class action litigation and litigation involving mortgage servicers, financial institutions, and fees. The Class Representatives have also supervised the litigation by reviewing pleadings, 3 The Fourth Circuit has recognized that these “factors for assessing class-action settlements almost completely overlap with the new Rule 23(e)(2) factors.” In re: Lumber Liquidators Chinese- Manufactured Flooring Prod. Mktg., Sales Pracs. & Prod. Liab. Litig., 952 ▇.▇▇ ▇▇▇, ▇▇▇ ▇.▇ (▇▇▇ ▇▇▇. 2020). reviewing the Settlement, and communicating with Class Counsel regarding the litigation. Rule 23(e)(2)(A) and the fourth fairness factor are satisfied. 2. The Court finds that the Settlement was negotiated at arm’s length before an experienced mediator and between experienced and sophisticated counsel. The settling Parties vigorously contested motions to dismiss, contested appeals from rulings on the motions, and engaged in formal settlement mediation with the assistance of a professional mediator. “These adversarial encounters dispel any apprehension of collusion between the parties.” In re NeuStar, Inc. Sec. Litig., No.

FINDINGS AND ORDER. 20 The Court hereby finds and orders as follows: 21 23. The Court has jurisdiction under 22 U.S.C. 9003(a). 22 24. The Court FINDS and DECLARES that:

FINDINGS AND ORDER. Therefore, the Interim Deputy Commissioner for Operations, under section 306(a) of the act, and under authority delegated to her (21 CFR 5.20), finds that Mr. ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ has been convicted of a felony under Federal law for conduct: (1) Relating to the development or approval, including the process for development or approval, of a drug product (21 U.S.C. 335a(a)(2)(A)); and (2) relating to the regulation of a drug product (21 U.S.C. 335a(a)(2)(B)). As a result of the foregoing findings, Mr. ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ is permanently debarred from providing services in any capacity to a person with an approved or pending drug product application under section 505, 507, 512, or 802 of the act (21 U.S.C. 355, 357, 360b, or 382), or under section 351 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262), effective November 8,1994 (21 U.S.C. 335a(c)(l)(B) and (c)(2)(A)(ii) ànd 21 U.S.C. 321(ee)). Any person with an approved or pending drug product application who knowingly uses the services of ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇ in any capacity, during his period of debarment, will be.subject to civil money penalties (21 U.S;C. 335b(a)(6)). If ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇, during his period of debarment, provides services in any capacity to a person with an approved or pending drug product application, he will be subject to civil money penalties (21 U.S.C. 335b(a)(7)). In addition, FDA will not accept or review any abbreviated new drug application or abbreviated antibiotic drug application submitted by or with ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇’▇ assistance during his period of debarment. ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇ may file an application to attempt to terminate his debarment, pursuant to section 306(d)(4)(A) of the act. Any such application would be reviewed under the criteria and processes set forth in section 306(d)(4)(C) and (d)(4)(D) of the act. Such an application should be identified with Docket No. 92N-0417 and sent to the Dockets Management Branch (address above). All such submissions are to be filed in four copies. The public availability of information in these submissions is governed by 21 CFR 10.20(j). Publicly available submissions may be seen in the Dockets Management Branch between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday - through Friday. Dated: October 28t 1994.

FINDINGS AND ORDER. Grant request for a Fermented Malt Beverage (3.2% Beer) License for We Are ONE, Inc. and 7- Eleven, Inc. (▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ - County Attorney's Office) 1. The Growing Project, Fort ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ - Special Event - 6%