Five-Year Review. Consistent with Section 121(c) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9621(c), and in accordance with this Agreement, the DOE agrees that if the remedial action(s) selected results in hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants remaining at the site, the EPA and SCDHEC will review the remedial action(s) no less often that once every five (5) years after the initiation of the final remedial action(s) to assure that human health and the environment are being protected by the remedial action(s) being implemented. If, upon such review, it is the judgment of EPA or SCDHEC that additional action or modification of a remedial action is appropriate in accordance with Sections 104, 106 or 120 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9604, 9606 or 9620 then EPA or SCDHEC shall require DOE to submit a proposal to implement such additional or modified action(s), which shall be subject to review and approval by EPA and SCDHEC. Any dispute under this Section shall be resolved under Section XXVII (Resolution of Disputes) of this Agreement.
Five-Year Review. The Commission shall review the operation and effectiveness of Article 21.16 not later than five years after the Agreement enters into force, or within six months after benefits have been suspended or monetary assessments have been paid in five proceedings initiated under this Chapter, whichever occurs first.
Five-Year Review. 117. Consistent with CERCLA Sec. 121(c), and in accordance with this Agreement, DOE agrees that the lead regulatory agency may review remedial action(s) for Operable Unit(s) that allow hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants to remain onsite, no less often than every five (5) years after the initiation of the final remedial action for such Operable Unit to assure that human health and the environment are being protected by the remedial action being implemented. If upon such review it is the judgment of the lead regulatory agency, that additional action or modification of the remedial action is appropriate in accordance with CERCLA Sec. 104 or 106, the lead regulatory agency may require DOE to implement such additional or modified work pursuant to Article XXX (Additional Work).
Five-Year Review. The Joint Committee shall review the operation and effectiveness of Articles 20.11 and
Five-Year Review. 8.1 Review – Material Change in Circumstances
Five-Year Review. 15.5.1 Unless otherwise agreed, the Parties shall conduct a joint review of the implementation of the IIBA five years after it is signed, in order to ensure that the objectives of section 8.4.4 of the NLCA and this IIBA are being met.
15.5.2 Unless otherwise agreed, the Parties shall prepare a written IIBA Implementation Report as part of the review conducted pursuant to section 15.5.1.
15.5.3 CWS and NTI shall jointly fund the review conducted and the report prepared pursuant to section 15.5.1.
Five-Year Review. Each MRO Regional Reliability Standard shall be reviewed at least once every five (5) years from the effective date of the standard or the latest revision to the standard, whichever is the later. The review process shall be conducted by soliciting comments from the stakeholders. If no changes are warranted, the SC shall recommend to the BOD that the Standard be reaffirmed. If the review indicates a need to revise or withdraw the standard, a SAR shall be prepared and submitted by the SC or any other stakeholder in accordance with the standards process. The SPM shall be responsible for administration of the five (5)-year review of MRO Regional Reliability Standards. The SPM shall be responsible for maintaining an electronic database of information regarding currently proposed and currently in effect MRO Regional Reliability Standards. This information shall include current standards in effect, proposed revisions to standards, and proposed new standards. This information shall provide a record, for at a minimum the previous five years, of the review and approval process for each MRO Regional Reliability Standard, including public comments received during the development and approval process. This information shall be available through public Internet access. The SPM shall be responsible for maintaining an historical record of MRO Regional Reliability Standards information that is no longer maintained on- line. Archived information shall be retained indefinitely as practical, but in no case less than five years or one complete standard review cycle from the date on which the standard was no longer in effect. Archived records of standards information shall be available electronically within 30 days following the receipt by the SPM of a written request.
Five-Year Review. The Commission shall review the operation and effectiveness of Articles 22.15 and
Five-Year Review. This Agreement shall be subject to periodic review once every five (5) years after the date of the start of Production for the purpose of good faith discussions to effect such modifications to this Agreement as may be necessary or desirable in the light of any substantial changes in circumstances which may have occurred during the previous five years.
Five-Year Review. Bonneville and the Foundation will perform a joint review of this Agreement every five years to confirm that the Agreement is serving both party’s interests and to modify the Agreement by mutual consent as necessary or desired by both parties to reflect then current conditions and policies.
