Follow-up Action Sample Clauses

Follow-up Action. Employee evaluations indicating “below standard” will require a follow-up evaluation in accordance with contract provisions.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Follow-up Action. Advise the property owner of the decision. The Corporate Officer to file the contemplated section 57 Community Charter Notice in the land title office. COMMUNICATION:
Follow-up Action. The Participants will, to the extent appropriate and practicable, cooperate to assist one another in any domestic or international action that may result from fisheries MCS or enforcement activities conducted under this Arrangement.
Follow-up Action. The results indicate a high level of employer compliance. Based on the findings of the compliance survey and to continue to monitor employer mandatory obligations the Board took the following actions ▪ All reports by Social Welfare Inspectors of possible non-compliance were pursued under the Board's normal compliance strategy. This has resulted in 12 successful employer prosecutions spread across the country. There are also a number of other cases in progress. ▪ Those employers who had advised the Board that they were 'non-compliant' were written to for clarification of their position. These cases continue to be followed up. ▪ The Board has liaised with the Revenue Commissioners in relation to a section on mandatory PRSA employer obligations being included in their publication 'Starting in Business - a Revenue Guide'. This has been in operation since August 2005 and should ensure that all newly registered employers are made aware of their obligations towards employees and PRSAs from the outset of the business Going Forward The Board's approach to employer mandatory obligations will alter significantly following the introduction of the 'on-the-spot' fines regime later in the summer. Thereafter, failure by any employer to respond to requests by the Board to confirm and supply documentary evidence of compliance with mandatory employer obligations will attract a civil penalty. This will include those employers who have failed to respond to the Board‟s compliance survey. Successive failure to respond to the Board will continue to be pursued through criminal proceedings. In December 2006 there were 80,463 registered employer designations; however of these arrangements only 10,647 have active contributors. The Board would encourage employers to be more active in encouraging employees to avail of PRSAs. We would also encourage employees to approach their employer or the Board where they have not been offered access to a PRSA or a pension scheme.

Related to Follow-up Action

  • PURPOSE/JUSTIFICATION OF RECOMMENDED ACTION The purpose of the Agreement is to provide the City with the services of one senior criminalist from the Department to perform DNA testing, analysis, and forensic-related consulting as requested by the City, effective upon execution by the Board through June 30, 2015. This Agreement will result in the creation of an additional senior criminalist position. The senior criminalist will be assigned solely to the Santa Xxxxxx Police Department (SMPD).

  • RECOMMENDED ACTION It is respectfully requested that the Procurement Committee recommend to the Aviation Authority Board approval of an Addendum to the Information Technology Consulting Services Agreement with Faith Group Consulting, LLC for the services contained herein and the amount as shown below: Not-to-Exceed Fees $0.00 Lump Sum Fees $2,600,000.00 Not-to-Exceed Expenses $0.00 TOTAL $2 600,000.00 AAC – Compliance Review Date 7/25/23 AAC – Funding Eligibility Review Date 7/25/23 ATTACHMENTS Attachment A – Finance Form Attachment B: OSBD Memo ATTACHMENT A FINANCE FORM Date: 07/14/23 Requestor’s Extension: 3902 Requestor’s Name: Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx Preparer’s Extension: 3124 Preparer’s Name: Xxx Xxxxxx Solicitation #: N/A Requestor’s Department: Information Technology Contract # / Name: Information Technology Consulting Services Description: Visual Communication Strategy, Procurement Committee Date: 8/1/2023 Innovation and Content Production Vendor: Faith Group Consulting LLC Agenda Item #: NON-PROJECT FUNDS: O&M, CAPEX, OEA REVENUE FUNDS Account Code Format: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx.xxxxxx FY 23 Amount FY24 Amount FY25 Amount FY26 Amount FY27 Amount TOTAL CONTRACT 301.521.210.5310009.000.100883 2,600,000.00 2,600,000.00 Total Requisition: 2,600,000.00 Requisition Number: 94581 Funding Approver: OMB Notes: 0000 X XXXXXX XXXX ST. XXXXX, MO 63143 T: 314.991.2228 | F: 314.991.2268 MEMORANDUM TO: Xxx Xxxxxx; IT Contracts Manager CC: Xxx Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx X’Xxxxx FROM: Xxxxx Xxxxxxx PROJECT: Visual Communication Strategy and Content Production PROJECT #: GOAA # TBD SUBJECT: Scope of Work & Cost Breakdown DATE: 7/10/2023 Overview Faith Group and Synect (the FG Team) have been tasked with providing a visual communications ecosystem that enables the airport to broadcast original content and deliver meaningful, up-to-date information to passengers. The visual communication ecosystem provides relevant, dynamic communication tools to inform and empower travelers.

  • Why did I get this Notice This is a court-authorized notice of a proposed Settlement in a class action lawsuit, Xxxxxx x. Loews Chicago Hotel, Inc., et. al., Case No. 19-cv-3195, pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. The Settlement would resolve a lawsuit brought on behalf of persons who allege that Loews Corporation; Loews COH Operating Company, LLC; Loews Chicago Hotel, Inc.; and Loews Chicago Operating Company, LLC (collectively, “Loews” or “Defendants”) required workers to provide their biometric identifier and/or biometric information for timekeeping or key control purposes without first providing them with legally-required written disclosures and obtaining written consent. Defendants contest these claims and deny that they violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act. If you received this Notice, you have been identified as a member of the Settlement Class. The Court has granted preliminary approval of the Settlement and has conditionally certified the Settlement Class for purposes of settlement only. This Notice explains the nature of the class action lawsuit, the terms of the Settlement, and the legal rights and obligations of the Settlement Class Members. Please read the instructions and explanations below so that you can better understand your legal rights. WHAT IS THIS LAWSUIT ABOUT? The Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (“BIPA”), 740 ILCS 14/1, et seq., prohibits private companies from capturing, obtaining, storing, transferring, and/or using the biometric identifiers and/or information, such as fingerprints, of another individual for any purpose, including timekeeping, without first providing such individual with certain written disclosures and obtaining written consent. This lawsuit alleges that Defendants violated the BIPA by requiring current and former workers to submit their hand or finger scan between July 26, 2013 and [DATE OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL] without first providing the requisite disclosures or obtaining the requisite consent. Defendants contest these claims and deny that they violated the BIPA. WHY IS THIS A CLASS ACTION? A class action is a lawsuit in which an individual called a “Class Representative” brings a single lawsuit on behalf of other people who have similar claims. All of these people together are a “Class” or “Class Members.” Once a Class is certified, a class action Settlement finally approved by the Court resolves the issues for all Settlement Class Members, except for those who exclude themselves from the Settlement Class. WHY IS THERE A SETTLEMENT? To resolve this matter without the expense, delay, and uncertainties of litigation, the Parties have reached a Settlement, which resolves all claims against Defendants. The Settlement requires Defendants to pay money to the Settlement Class, as well as pay settlement administration expenses, attorneys’ fees and costs to Class Counsel, and an incentive award to the Class Representative, if approved by the Court. The Settlement is not an admission of wrongdoing by Defendants and does not imply that there has been, or would be, any finding that Defendants violated the law. The Court has already preliminarily approved the Settlement. Nevertheless, because the settlement of a class action determines the rights of all members of the class, the Court overseeing this lawsuit must give final approval to the Settlement before it can be effective. The Court has conditionally certified the Settlement Class for settlement purposes only, so that members of the Settlement Class can be given this Notice and the opportunity to exclude themselves from the Settlement Class, and to voice their support or opposition to final approval of the Settlement. If the Court does not give final approval to the Settlement, or if it is terminated by the Parties, the Settlement will be void, and the lawsuit will proceed as if there had been no settlement and no certification of the Settlement Class.

  • Right to Grieve Other Disciplinary Action (a) Disciplinary action grievable by the employee shall include:

  • THIRD PARTY ACTION NOTIFICATION Vendor shall give Customer prompt notice in writing of any action or suit filed, and prompt notice of any claim made against Vendor by any entity that may result in litigation related in any way to this Agreement.

  • CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDED ACTION This agreement formalizes the mechanism that may be used by the City to transfer civil rights complaints to the Iowa Civil Rights Commission for investigation. ICRC will compensate the City for acting as the intake agent under this agreement. The City and ICRC have maintained this arrangement for several years. Transferring this time- consuming investigation responsibility to the ICRC will allow the Ames Human Relations Commission more time to devote to proactive educational projects in the community. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council adopt Alternative No. 1, as described above.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.