GMP Review and Approval Sample Clauses

GMP Review and Approval. XXXX shall meet with LCCC and Design Professional to review the GMP Proposal and the written statement of its basis. In the event that LCCC or Design Professional discovers any inconsistencies or inaccuracies in the information presented, they shall promptly notify XXXX, who shall make appropriate adjustments to the GMP Proposal, its basis or both. (i) Upon receiving the GMP Proposal from XXXX, LCCC may submit the same documents that were used by XXXX in developing the GMP to an independent third party for review and verification. The third party shall develop an independent cost of the Work estimate and review the Construction Schedule for the Project. (ii) If XXXX’x GMP Proposal is greater than Project budget or otherwise not acceptable as originally submitted, LCCC may require XXXX to reconfirm its GMP. If XXXX’x original GMP or revised GMP is within LCCC’s budget and is found to be otherwise acceptable, LCCC may accept XXXX’x GMP Proposal without comment and amend this Contract to include construction. (iii) Phased GMP’s. XXXX may be requested to provide individual GMP Proposals for specific construction phases of this Project. These individual phase GMP Proposals shall be based on the specific phases of construction and will be prepared in accordance with the procedures identified in this Contract.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
GMP Review and Approval. (a) DEVELOPER will meet with COUNTY, Architect, and Xxxxxxxxx’s XXXX to review the GMP and the written statement of its basis. If COUNTY discovers inconsistencies or inaccuracies in the information presented, DEVELOPER will make adjustments as necessary to the GMP, its basis or both. COUNTY, DEVELOPER, Architect, and Developer’s XXXX will each review and digitally sign the Approved Design Development Plans and Specifications upon which the GMP will be based. The Approved Design Development Plans and Specifications shall comport with the preliminary building program set forth in Exhibit F (and any approved revisions thereto). COUNTY will attend meetings during each design phase and will have the opportunity to review the design documents at those meetings as the design documents are being developed. COUNTY will have 30 days to review and approve in writing (via digital signature) each set of design documents (schematic and design development) when they are deemed completed and delivered by DEVELOPER to COUNTY. If COUNTY approves a set of design documents, on which DEVELOPER relies, then later directs DEVELOPER to make material changes to the approved documents, then COUNTY will pay DEVELOPER for the actual cost of making such revisions as an additional cost through a Change Order. For example, if COUNTY approves the Schematic Design Documents, but then during the Design Development phase directs a change to a PROJECT component that was previously agreed to in the Schematic Design Documents, then the cost of making those COUNTY directed revisions will be deemed a valid Change Order. (b) DEVELOPER may be requested to, or at its own discretion may, submit a revised GMP for consideration by COUNTY, including reducing scope, quality, or features if necessary to bring the PROJECT within budget reflecting the anticipated scope and timing of the PROJECT that is deemed fair and reasonable to DEVELOPER. At that time, COUNTY may do one of the following: (1) Accept DEVELOPER’s original or revised GMP without comment, if within COUNTY’s budget. (2) Accept DEVELOPER’s original or revised GMP that exceeds COUNTY’s budget, and indicate in writing to DEVELOPER that the PROJECT budget has been increased to fund the differences through an amendment to this AGREEMENT. (3) Reject DEVELOPER’s original or revised GMP because it exceeds COUNTY’s budget and the independent third party’s estimate, in which event COUNTY may terminate this AGREEMENT and/or elect to not enter into the ...
Sample 1

Related to GMP Review and Approval

  • Review and Approval The Supplier confirms and agrees that it shall apply to receive ISR's written consent, wherever ISR's consent, explicitly or implied, is required according to this Agreement. This requirement and the provision of ISR consent, shall not derogate in any way from Supplier's responsibilities and liabilities under this Agreement, and ISR shall bear no responsibility or liability whatsoever in connection with the review (whether or not there are objections) and/or with any approval given to, or denied from, Supplier, with respect to any matter and/or document, including but without limitation, drawings, designs (at all phases), plans, tests or otherwise.

  • Review and Appeal 1. Each Party shall ensure that the importers in its territory have access to administrative review within the customs administration that issued the decision subject to review or, where applicable, the higher authority supervising the administration and/or judicial review of the determination taken at the final level of administrative review, in accordance with the Party's domestic law. 2. The decision on appeal shall be given to the appellant and the reasons for such decision shall be provided in writing. 3. The level of administrative review may include any authority supervising the customs administration of a Party.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Business Review Meetings In order to maintain the relationship between the Department and the Contractor, each quarter the Department may request a business review meeting. The business review meeting may include, but is not limited to, the following: • Successful completion of deliverables • Review of the Contractor’s performance • Review of minimum required reports • Addressing of any elevated Customer issues • Review of continuous improvement ideas that may help lower total costs and improve business efficiencies.

  • Review Scope The parties confirm that the Asset Representations Review is not responsible for (a) reviewing the Receivables for compliance with the representations and warranties under the Transaction Documents, except as described in this Agreement or (b) determining whether noncompliance with the representations and warranties constitutes a breach of the Eligibility Representations. For the avoidance of doubt, the parties confirm that the review is not designed to determine why an Obligor is delinquent or the creditworthiness of the Obligor, either at the time of any Asset Review or at the time of origination of the related Receivable. Further, the Asset Review is not designed to establish cause, materiality or recourse for any Test Fail (as defined in Section 3.05).

  • Commercialization Reports Throughout the term of this Agreement and during the Sell-Off Period, and within thirty (30) days of December 31st of each year, Company will deliver to University written reports of Company’s and Sublicensees’ efforts and plans to develop and commercialize the innovations covered by the Licensed Rights and to make and sell Licensed Products. Company will have no obligation to prepare commercialization reports in years where (a) Company delivers to University a written Sales Report with active sales, and (b) Company has fulfilled all Performance Milestones. In relation to each of the Performance Milestones each commercialization report will include sufficient information to demonstrate achievement of those Performance Milestones and will set out timeframes and plans for achieving those Performance Milestones which have not yet been met.

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

  • Authorization, Approval, etc No authorization, approval, or other action by, and no notice to or filing with, any governmental authority, regulatory body or any other Person is required either (a) for the pledge by the Pledgor of any Collateral pursuant to this Pledge Agreement or for the execution, delivery, and performance of this Pledge Agreement by the Pledgor, or (b) for the exercise by the Collateral Agent of the voting or other rights provided for in this Pledge Agreement, or, except with respect to any Pledged Shares, as may be required in connection with a disposition of such Pledged Shares by laws affecting the offering and sale of securities generally, the remedies in respect of the Collateral pursuant to this Pledge Agreement.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!