IEA model Sample Clauses

IEA model. ‌ We adopt the non-cooperative game framework referenced above to investigate abatement gains of self- enforcing partial coalitions in contrast with null-coalition and full-coalition behavior. The global profit function is defined as: (1) Each nation bears the cost, Ci, of its own abatement, qi, while all nations share the benefits of reduc- tion of harm, Bi, from global abatement Q. In a stable partial coalition, members have a collective profit that is at least as high as the sum of their individual profits operating alone. However, the allocation of abatement levels within the coalition that maximizes the coalition profit might not result in a higher individual profit for each member compared to their profit if they left the coalition. To overcome this problem, a transfer payment scheme redistributes the net burden among members. The “burden-sharing” rule ensures that the profit each nation receives as a coalition member exceeds what they receive outside the coalition. Nations that xxxxx an amount greater than required under the agreement would receive a positive transfer, while nations that purchase permits are able to meet their abatement responsibilities under the agreement at a lower cost. Net transfers are zero-sum. Xxxxxxx (2009) presents a family of sharing rules that satisfy the internal and external stability re- quirements cited above. We adopt one rule from this set: the allocation rule for abatement requirements under a system of tradable pollution permits followed by XxXxxxx (2007). This rule proposes transfers between coalition members that are “just sufficient to quell any incentive to deviate from the agreement” and distributes the remaining coalition surplus in proportion to the membersbenefit share-to-cost ratio. 3 Application of IEA Model to Debris Mitigation‌ For this initial model of an IEA for space debris mitigation, we examine the effect of a self-enforcing market mechanism on parties’ choices regarding a single type of abatement action: deorbiting of space- craft after mission lifetime. We do not consider other actions parties might take that would affect the rate of debris generation such as active removal of debris, collision avoidance, or anti-satellite weaponry. 3.1 Elements of the model‌ An IEA model requires the following elements: We specify the elements as follows for a space debris mitigation IEA: 3.1.1 Environmental resource and pollutant‌ The environmental resource is taken to be the 900–1000 km altitude shell-of-in...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to IEA model

  • Model List your model number of the product you are bidding.

  • Flexible Work Schedule A flexible work schedule is any schedule that is not a regular, alternate, 9/80, or 4/10 work schedule and where the employee is not scheduled to work more than 40 hours in the "workweek" as defined in Subsections F. and H., below.

  • Financial Model The Financial Model has been prepared in good faith based on reasonable assumptions as to the estimates set forth therein and is consistent in all material respects with the provisions of the Material Contracts.

  • Disaster Recovery Plan Contractor agrees that upon request of System Agency, Contractor shall provide copies of its most recent business continuity and disaster recovery plans.

  • Flexible Scheduling All posts experience a higher day-time volume than occurs during the night hours and the Parties agree to a flexible scheduling as outlined below to be compatible with the needs of the community served and availability of on-call staff and the members of the post’s full-time staff.

  • HIV/AIDS Model Workplace Guidelines Grantee will: a. implement the System Agency’s policies based on the Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (HIV/AIDS), AIDS Model Workplace Guidelines for Businesses at xxxx://xxx.xxxx.xxxxx.xx.xx/hivstd/policy/policies.shtm, State Agencies and State Grantees Policy No. 090.021. b. educate employees and clients concerning HIV and its related conditions, including AIDS, in accordance with the Texas. Health & Safety Code §§ 85.112-114.

  • Design Review ‌ (a) Where so specified in Schedule A (Scope of Goods and Services) or as otherwise instructed by the City, the Supplier shall submit design-related Documentation for review by the City, and shall not proceed with work on the basis of such design Documentation until the City’s approval of such Documentation has been received in writing. (b) None of: (i) the submission of Documentation to the City by the Supplier; (ii) its examination by or on behalf of the City; or (iii) the making of any comment thereon (including any approval thereof) shall in any way relieve the Supplier of any of its obligations under this Agreement or of its duty to take reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy and correctness of such Documentation, and its suitability to the matter to which it relates.

  • Flexible Work Schedules An employee may request a modification of their current work schedule to another schedule. The Employer, or its designees, may approve or deny flexible work schedules and retain the responsibility for determining exemptions from, or terminations of, flexible work schedules which adversely affect the operation of the Minnesota Judicial Branch or the level of service to the public.

  • Methodology 1. The price at which the Assuming Institution sells or disposes of Qualified Financial Contracts will be deemed to be the fair market value of such contracts, if such sale or disposition occurs at prevailing market rates within a predefined timetable as agreed upon by the Assuming Institution and the Receiver. 2. In valuing all other Qualified Financial Contracts, the following principles will apply:

  • Project Implementation Manual The Recipient, through the PCU, shall: (i) take all action required to carry out Parts 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 2, 3.1(b), 3.2, 3.3 and 4 (ii) of the Project in accordance with the provisions and requirements set forth or referred to in the Project Implementation Manual; (ii) submit recommendations to the Association for its consideration for changes and updates of the Project Implementation Manual as they may become necessary or advisable during Project implementation in order to achieve the objective of Parts 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 2, 3.1(b), 3.2, 3.3 and 4(ii) of the Project; and (iii) not assign, amend, abrogate or waive the Project Implementation Manual or any of its provisions without the Association’s prior agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if any of the provisions of the Project Implementation Manual is inconsistent with the provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail and govern.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!