Implementation Timing. At the request of the DEPARTMENT, the CONTRACTOR has agreed to a phased implementation process. It is agreed that on or before sixty (60) days after all required signatures have been affixed to this AGREEMENT ("INITIAL IMPLEMENTATION DATE"), the CONTRACTOR shall implement the services at the Correctional Industrial Facility located at Pendleton, Indiana, and the Pendxxxxx Correctional Facility located at Pendleton, Indiana (both sites as identified in the BID DOCUMENTS). Not earlier than sixty (60) days, nor later than ninety (90) days thereafter, the CONTRACTOR shall commence implementation of services at the other IDOC SITES delineated in the RFP, according to the implementation schedule attached hereto as Exhibit C, with final implementation at all IDOC SITES as therein indicated ("FINAL IMPLEMENTATION DATE"). The parties shall use good faith efforts to comply with such implementation schedule. CONTRACTOR shall use its best efforts to notify the DEPARTMENT of the IMPLEMENTATION DATE for each IDOC SITE thirty (30) days in advance of such IMPLEMENTATION DATE, if possible, or on the earliest date as is reasonably feasible.
Implementation Timing. [Complete Agreement] In its evidence, Union noted that the approvals sought in its application were for the unbundling of upstream transportation and storage and that the Board decision was expected for May, 2000. Union also highlighted that new and enhanced systems would be required in order to manage daily nominations and other parameters associated with the unbundled service. Overall, Union projected a September 1, 2000 implementation date for the unbundling services. The oral hearing for the remaining unresolved issues related to PBR and unbundling are proposed to take place in June. Depending on the timing of a Board decision, Union will attempt to seek a Board approved rate order necessary to implement the new services and associated rates as soon as possible. At this time, Union does not expect that the new unbundled services will be implemented before November 1, 2000. The parties acknowledge the necessity to address rates and services related to retail billing through a subsequent application in order to provide small volume, non-daily metered customers access to the new unbundled services. Union commits to filing this application by July, 2000 and agrees to forgo the consultation process originally contemplated in order to dispose of the application as soon as practicable to allow for the unbundled services for the small volume market to be accessed as close to April 1, 2001 as possible. The parties also acknowledge that Union will incur certain costs in order to be in a position to provide the new unbundled services. These costs and the associated recovery will be addressed under Issue 4.2 – Incremental Unbundling Costs Account, during the hearing.
Implementation Timing. Because of the critical importance of timing for its Cooperators, NRCS Oregon has developed specific guidance for the timing of implementation on its undertakings from the standpoint of cultural resources compliance. Timing for implementation can vary according to the specific circumstances of an undertaking, but timing can generally be determined according to the five- category cultural resources compliance system. The timing of implementation for each category is discussed in the following sections and summarized in Table 1.
Implementation Timing
