INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL REVIEW Sample Clauses

INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL REVIEW. You or your authorized representative may make a request for a standard external review or expedited external review of an Adverse Determination or Final Adverse Determination by an independent review organization (IRO).
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL REVIEW. Appeal decisions involving an Adverse Utilization Determination or an Adverse Health Care Treatment Decision by Health Options are eligible for review by an independent review organization designated by the Maine Bureau of Insurance. Adverse Utilization Determinations for purposes of independent external review include Medical Necessity, appropriateness, health care setting, level of care, effectiveness of a covered Benefit, Experimental or Investigational treatment or services, and rescission. The external review decision must be made within 30 days after the independent review organization receives the request for the review. However, the decision must be made within 72 hours if delay would seriously jeopardize the life or health of the Member or would jeopardize the Member’s ability to regain maximum function. If the independent review organization decides in your favor, the decision is binding on Health Options. Normally, you must first complete Health Options’ first and second level Appeals process to be eligible for independent external review. However, you are not required to complete the first and second level Appeals process if:
INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL REVIEW. A. You have the right to an “independent external review” of an appealable decision made by MVP. An independent external review is an independent review of our decision by a third party known as an independent review organization. Independent review organizations (“IRO”) are selected by the DFR and must not have any conflict of interest associated with the review. You have the right to request a review by a State approved IRO after the first level of internal appeal has been exhausted or after the voluntary second level of appeal where MVP has denied coverage based on medical necessity; experimental or investigational nature of the services; off-label use of a drug; choice of provider; and for mental health and substance abuse reviews. You do not have the right to external review of any other decisions, even if those other decisions affect your eligibility or benefits. Exhaustion of the internal grievance process is not required when MVP has waived the internal grievance process or has been deemed to have waived the internal grievance process by failing to adhere to grievance process time requirements. (An expedited External Appeal can be made simultaneously with an expedited first level of internal appeal.) The right to independent external review is contingent on the Enrollee’s exhaustion of MVP’s first level internal grievance process unless as noted above. You may have the right to an expedited external review if the subject of the review concerns an emergency medical condition, emergency services, or urgently needed care. The timeframes for expedited external reviews are shorter than the timeframes for standard external reviews. You may request an expedited external appeal even if your internal appeal was non-expedited.
INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL REVIEW. Appeal decisions involving an Adverse Utilization Determination or an Adverse Health Care Treatment Decision by Health Options are eligible for review by an independent review organization designated by the Maine Bureau of Insurance. Adverse Utilization Determinations for purposes of independent external review include Medical Necessity, appropriateness, health care setting, level of care, effectiveness of a covered Benefit, Experimental or Investigational treatment or services, and rescission. The external review decision must be made within 30 days after the independent review organ ization receives the request for the review. However, the decision must be made within 72 hours if delay would maximum function. If the independent re view organization decides in your favor, the decision is binding on Health Options. independent external review. However, you are not required to complete the first and second level Appeals process if:

Related to INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL REVIEW

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Financial Review You agree to provide us with a financial statement or information on your financial condition upon our request.

  • Review The practitioner reviews the treatment plan and discusses, when appropriate, case circumstances and management options with the attending (or referring) physician. The reviewer consults with the requesting physician when more clarity is needed to make an informed coverage decision. The reviewer may consult with board certified physicians from appropriate specialty areas to assist in making determinations of coverage and/or appropriateness. All such consultations will be documented in the review text. If the reviewer determines that the admission, continued stay or service requested is not a covered service, a notice of non-coverage is issued. Only a physician, behavioral health practitioner (such as a psychiatrist, doctoral-level clinical psychologist, certified addiction medicine specialist), dentist or pharmacist who has the clinical expertise appropriate to the request under review with an unrestricted license may deny coverage based on medical necessity.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.