INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL REVIEW Sample Clauses

INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL REVIEW. You or your authorized representative may make a request for a standard external review or expedited external review of an Adverse Determination or Final Adverse Determination by an independent review organization (IRO).
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL REVIEW. Appeal decisions involving an Adverse Utilization Determination or an Adverse Health Care Treatment Decision by Health Options are eligible for review by an independent review organization designated by the Maine Bureau of Insurance. Adverse Utilization Determinations for purposes of independent external review include Medical Necessity, appropriateness, health care setting, level of care, effectiveness of a covered Benefit, Experimental or Investigational treatment or services, and rescission. The external review decision must be made within 30 days after the independent review organization receives the request for the review. However, the decision must be made within 72 hours if delay would seriously jeopardize the life or health of the Member or would jeopardize the Member’s ability to regain maximum function. If the independent review organization decides in your favor, the decision is binding on Health Options. Normally, you must first complete Health Options’ first and second level Appeals process to be eligible for independent external review. However, you are not required to complete the first and second level Appeals process if:
INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL REVIEW. ‌ Enrollees may request an independent external review within one hundred twenty (120) Calendar Days of notification that an appealed Adverse Benefit Determination has been upheld or when the Appeal process has been deemed exhausted by way of Insurer’s failure to adhere to the notification and timing requirements of 42 CFR 457.1260 which incorporates 42 CFR 438.408. Insurer shall maintain a contract with an Independent Review Organization (IRO) for the provision of Enrollees’ option to have a post-appeal independent review. Such contract shall specify and meet all state and federal laws, regulations and guidance applicable to CHIP Grievance and Appeal process requirements and subcontractor requirements, including FHKC’s audit rights. Insurer shall provide a quarterly report listing all independent reviews the IRO handled in the quarter, including the date the independent review was requested, the date the IRO made a final decision, the outcome of the review, whether Insurer has since received any Grievances related to the independent review and any other information requested by FHKC. Enrollees and the Enrollee’s representative or the legal representative of a deceased Xxxxxxxx’s estate shall be included as parties to the review. In the event the independent external review overturns an Adverse Benefit Determination, Insurer shall authorize or provide the disputed services promptly and as expeditiously as the Enrollee’s health condition requires, but no later than seventy-two (72) hours from the independent external review determination date. Insurer is responsible for the full cost of all independent reviews.
INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL REVIEW. A. You have the right to an “independent external review” of an appealable decision made by MVP. An independent external review is an independent review of our decision by a third party known as an independent review organization. Independent review organizations (“IRO”) are selected by the DFR and must not have any conflict of interest associated with the review. You have the right to request a review by a State approved IRO after the first level of internal appeal has been exhausted or after the voluntary second level of appeal where MVP has denied coverage based on medical necessity; experimental or investigational nature of the services; off-label use of a drug; choice of provider; and for mental health and substance abuse reviews. You do not have the right to external review of any other decisions, even if those other decisions affect your eligibility or benefits. Exhaustion of the internal grievance process is not required when MVP has waived the internal grievance process or has been deemed to have waived the internal grievance process by failing to adhere to grievance process time requirements. (An expedited External Appeal can be made simultaneously with an expedited first level of internal appeal.) The right to independent external review is contingent on the Subscriber’s exhaustion of MVP’s first level internal grievance process unless as noted above. You may have the right to an expedited external review if the subject of the review concerns an emergency medical condition, emergency services, or urgently needed care. The timeframes for expedited external reviews are shorter than the timeframes for standard external reviews. You may request an expedited external appeal even if your internal appeal was non-expedited.
INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL REVIEW. Appeal decisions involving an Adverse Utilization Determination or an Adverse Health Care Treatment Decision by Health Options are eligible for review by an independent review organization designated by the Maine Bureau of Insurance. Adverse Utilization Determinations for purposes of independent external review include Medical Necessity, appropriateness, health care setting, level of care, effectiveness of a covered Benefit, Experimental or Investigational treatment or services, and rescission. The external review decision must be made within 30 days after the independent review organ ization receives the request for the review. However, the decision must be made within 72 hours if delay would maximum function. If the independent re view organization decides in your favor, the decision is binding on Health Options. independent external review. However, you are not required to complete the first and second level Appeals process if:

Related to INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL REVIEW

  • External Review In the event of a final internal Adverse Benefit Determination, a Claimant may be entitled to an external review of the Claim. This request must be submitted in writing on an External Review Request form within 120 days of receipt of the Adverse Benefit Determination. The external reviewer will render a recommendation within 45 calendar days unless the request meets expedited criteria, in which case it will be resolved in no later than 72 hours. The external reviewer’s recommendation will be binding. The external reviewer will notify the Claimant of its decision in writing, and the Plan will take action as appropriate to comply with such recommendation. For detailed information about the external review process, please contact XxXxx’s Member Engagement Center.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

  • Independent Evaluation Buyer is an experienced and knowledgeable investor in the oil and gas business. Buyer has been advised by and has relied solely on its own expertise and legal, tax, title, reservoir engineering, environmental and other professional counsel concerning this transaction, the Properties, the value thereof and title thereto.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Informal Review Step 1. As soon as practicable, the employee may discuss the grievance with his/her immediate supervisor and/or University representative(s). All parties may informally attempt a resolution of the matter before a formal grievance is filed. Informal resolutions, although final, shall not be precedent setting. If the grievance is not resolved through informal discussion with the immediate supervisor and/or University representative(s), the employee may file a formal grievance as set forth below.

  • Financial Review You agree to provide us with a financial statement or information on your financial condition upon our request.

  • Review The practitioner reviews the treatment plan and discusses, when appropriate, case circumstances and management options with the attending (or referring) physician. The reviewer consults with the requesting physician when more clarity is needed to make an informed coverage decision. The reviewer may consult with board certified physicians from appropriate specialty areas to assist in making determinations of coverage and/or appropriateness. All such consultations will be documented in the review text. If the reviewer determines that the admission, continued stay or service requested is not a covered service, a notice of non-coverage is issued. Only a physician, behavioral health practitioner (such as a psychiatrist, doctoral-level clinical psychologist, certified addiction medicine specialist), dentist or pharmacist who has the clinical expertise appropriate to the request under review with an unrestricted license may deny coverage based on medical necessity.

  • Annual Review The Board of Directors during the Contract Period shall review annually, or at more frequent intervals which the Board of Directors determines is appropriate, the Executive’s compensation and shall award the Executive additional compensation to reflect the Executive’s performance, the performance of the Company and competitive compensation levels, all as determined in the discretion of the Board of Directors.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!