External reviews Sample Clauses

External reviews. Oracle may conduct independent reviews of Cloud Services utilizing third parties in the following areas (the scope of any such reviews may vary by service and country): • SOC 1 (based on Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements (SSAE) No 18) and/or SOC 2 reports • Other independent third-party security testing to review the effectiveness of administrative and technical controls. Relevant information from these reviews may be made available to customers.

External reviews. (a) Any enrollee who has exhausted the internal appeals mechanisms provided by a claims payer and the plan administrator under Sections 2 and 3, may appeal to the plan administrator for external review. (b) To appeal a decision, an enrollee shall, within thirty (30) days from receiving a final written determination from plan administrator, file a written request for an external review with the plan administrator. The request shall be on a form prescribed by the plan administrator and shall include an executed release form, evidence of coverage, and evidence that all internal appeals have been exhausted. (c) The plan administrator will, within fifteen (15) days of receiving an appeal, forward the appeal to an appropriate external review organization, based on the nature of the appeal, as follows: (1) any appeal of a determination not to certify (or not to pay a claim for) an admission, service, procedure or extension of stay shall be referred to an independent review organization; and (2) any other appeal, including those relating to coordination of benefits, and calculation of usual, customary and reasonable charges, shall be referred to the Health Plan Review Group.

External reviews. The department or unit head will prepare a list of qualified 13 external reviewers, with input from the department or unit faculty eligible to vote on a tenure 14 and promotion case. The department or unit head will select a majority of the external reviewers 15 from this independently prepared list, but the department or unit head’s primary responsibility is 16 to obtain the best judgments from the most highly qualified experts in the appropriate areas.

External reviews. The department or unit head will prepare a list of qualified external reviewers, with input from the department or unit faculty eligible to vote on a tenure and promotion case. The department or unit head will select a majority of the external reviewers, but the department or unit head’s primary responsibility is to obtain the best judgments from the most highly qualified experts in the appropriate areas. Most, if not all, of the external reviewers should be at the rank for which the candidate is being considered or above (i.e., associate professor or professor for tenure and promotion to

External reviews. Any enrollee who has exhausted the internal appeals mechanisms provided by a claims payer and the plan administrator under Sections 2 and 3, may appeal to the plan administrator for external review.

External reviews. The department or unit head will prepare a list of qualified 43 external reviewers, with input from the department or unit faculty eligible to vote on a tenure and 44 promotion case. The department or unit head will select a majority of the external reviewers from 45 this independently prepared list, but the department or unit head’s primary responsibility is to 46 obtain the best judgments from the most highly qualified experts in the appropriate areas. Most, 47 if not all, of the external reviewers should be at the rank for which the candidate is being 1 considered or above (i.e., associate professor or professor for tenure and promotion to associate 2 professor; professor for promotion to professor). Reviewers generally should come from 3 comparable AAU and research intensive institutions or programs. The suggestions regarding 4 affiliations apply to the majority of external reviewers and are not strict prohibitions. A 5 minimum of five substantive external evaluations is required for a tenure case to move forward. 7 The department or unit head will recruit external reviewers from the list prepared by the 9 absolute majority of external reviews included in the file must be provided by reviewers selected 10 by the department or unit and not included on the list of reviewers provided by the faculty 11 member under review. If there is overlap between the independently-prepared lists, the external 12 reviewer counts as a unit selection. The department or unit head will provide each external 13 reviewer with the candidate’s signed and dated curriculum vitae, signed and dated personal 14 statement, the candidate’s scholarship portfolio, and the department’s or unit’s written criteria for 15 promotion and tenure. External reviewers may not be asked to evaluate the candidate against the 16 standards of their own institution.

External reviews. Our firm received a "pass" rating on the peer review requirements of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (attached), which is the highest rating issued for peer review requirements. Our ▇▇▇▇ does not have a record of substandard audit work, has not been involved in litigation regarding our work product and we have not been dismissed from an attestation engagement for substandard work. Our firm has not had any audits selected for federal or state desk reviews or field reviews during the past three years. In additional, there has been no disciplinary action taken or pending against our ▇▇▇▇ during the past three years by state regulatory bodies or professional organizations. We believe that our existing and previous client engagements will be able to provide you with the greatest assurance regarding the quality of our service and we invite you to contact any of our clients listed below. We present this particular list of clients and engagements because we believe their needs and the services we provide to them closely mirror your needs and the services we propose to you. Should you desire additional client references, please feel free to contact us. ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ served as the engagement partner for all engagements listed. Laramie County Clerk Non-attestation and Consulting Services - June 30, 2021 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Accounting Manager (▇▇▇) ▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ LEADS Audit Services - December 31, 2021 ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Office Manager (▇▇▇) ▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ Cheyenne Regional Medical Center Foundation Accounting/Bookkeeping Services - Ongoing Monthly Engagement ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ Executive Director (▇▇▇) ▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ Laramie County Conservation District Audit Services - June 30, 2021 ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Financial Director (▇▇▇) ▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ We propose the following non-attest accounting services for Laramie County for the year ended June 30, 2023:

External reviews. The Trust shall be subject to periodic external reviews of its programme and of its management by an independent review panel appointed by the Executive Board, after consultation with the Governing Body and the Donors’ Council, as appropriate, with regard to the terms of reference of the review and composition of the Panel. Such reviews will take place every three to five years or more often if so determined by the Executive Board. The Governing Body of the International Treaty, or the Donors’ Council, may call for extraordinary external reviews.

External reviews. For each subsequent external review beyond 5 total reviews per year, a fee of $500 will apply per review 2012 Fee Waived Amendment Part V. The parties agree that Exhibit C titled - PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR HEALTH BENEFITS of the Agreement as previously amended by Amendment Part III of the Seventh Amendment to the Agreement shall be amended to read as follows