Initial Applicable Review Period for Recoverable Submissions Sample Clauses

Initial Applicable Review Period for Recoverable Submissions. ‌‌‌ ‌‌ Each NFPS Agency shall have the right to provide Work Site Access in addition to the Incremental Access Parameter and Aggregate Access Parameter totals described in Section 5.8 (Delays Concerning Work Site Access; Certain Excusable Delays) (the "Additional Work Site Access"). Any Additional Work Site Access provided by an NFPS Agency shall count toward the Aggregate Access Parameter totals described in Section 5.8 (Delays Concerning Work Site Access; Certain Excusable Delays) during the time period applicable to said Aggregate Access Parameter if, after exercising its good faith efforts, the SI is able to utilize such Additional Work Site Access in order to complete the Scheduled Installation Work within the Aggregate Access Parameter. By way of clarifying example, if NYCT fails to meet the Incremental Access Parameter in a particular week, but provides Additional Work Site Access during an otherwise unavailable time (e.g., Sunday morning), and the SI is able to utilize such Additional Work Site Access so that the Aggregate Access Parameter is met, then the SI shall not be entitled to request an Excusable Delay Extension.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Initial Applicable Review Period for Recoverable Submissions. The table included in this Section 5.7.1 (Initial Applicable Review Period for Recoverable Submissions) identifies the amount of time (excluding any time during which a Stop Work Order is in effect) in which the MTA shall undertake and complete its initial Review and Approval of Recoverable Submissions that the SI submits in a form ready for the MTA's review (each, an "Initial Applicable Review Period"). The MTA shall have seven (7) days from its receipt of each Recoverable Submission to determine whether such Recoverable Submission is in a form ready for review (the "Quality Confirmation Period"). If the MTA fails to notify the SI in writing during the Quality Confirmation Period that the applicable Recoverable Submission is not in a form ready for review, then the Initial Applicable Review Period shall be deemed to have commenced upon the MTA's receipt of the applicable Recoverable Submission. If the MTA determines that the applicable Recoverable Submission is not in a form ready for review, and notifies the SI of the same during the Quality Confirmation Period, then the SI shall correct the Recoverable Submission and resubmit it to the MTA for further review pursuant to this Section 5.7.1 (Initial Applicable Review Period for Recoverable Submissions), and such resubmission shall be treated as an initial submission and shall not be considered, or treated, as a Resubmitted Recoverable Submission. If the MTA fails to complete its Review and Approval process within the Initial Applicable Review Period, then the SI may be entitled to an Excusable Delay Extension for such failure, subject to Section 5.7.2 (Orderly Submission Requirement), Section 5.7.3 (Submission Quality Requirement), Section 5.7.4 (Notice to MTA of Submission Deadline) and Section 5.17 (Additional Limitations on Delay-Related SI Remedies): No. Recoverable Submission Section Reference Initial Review Period 1. Proposed Master Program Schedule Section 5.2.2 (Review and Approval of the Proposed Master Program Schedule) Thirty (30) days 2. MPS Updates Section 5.2.3 (Updates to the Master Program Schedule) Five (5) days 3. BU Remaining Work Completion Schedule Section 5.4.2 (Schedule for Completing BU Remaining Work) Ten (10) days 4. Remaining Work Completion Schedule Section 5.4.5 (Schedule for Completing Remaining Work) Ten (10) days 5. Requests for General Orders and Related Services Section 5.10 (Requests for NFPS Agency- Supplied Services) Ten (10) days 6. Access Requests Section 5.10 (Reque...
Sample 1

Related to Initial Applicable Review Period for Recoverable Submissions

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Completion of Review for Certain Review Receivables Following the delivery of the list of the Review Receivables and before the delivery of the Review Report by the Asset Representations Reviewer, the Servicer may notify the Asset Representations Reviewer if a Review Receivable is paid in full by the Obligor or purchased from the Issuer in accordance with the terms of the Basic Documents. On receipt of such notice, the Asset Representations Reviewer will immediately terminate all Tests of the related Review Receivable, and the Review of such Review Receivables will be considered complete (a “Test Complete”). In this case, the related Review Report will indicate a Test Complete for such Review Receivable and the related reason.

  • Transition Review Period In accordance with Article 35, Layoff and Recall, the Employer may require an employee to complete a transition review period.

  • Business Review Meetings In order to maintain the relationship between the Department and the Contractor, each quarter the Department may request a business review meeting. The business review meeting may include, but is not limited to, the following: • Successful completion of deliverables • Review of the Contractor’s performance • Review of minimum required reports • Addressing of any elevated Customer issues • Review of continuous improvement ideas that may help lower total costs and improve business efficiencies.

  • Noteholder Demand for Asset Representations Review If a Delinquency Trigger occurs, as reported on Form 10-D, a Noteholder (if the Notes are represented by Definitive Notes) or a Note Owner (if the Notes are represented by Book-Entry Notes) may make a demand on the Indenture Trustee to cause a vote of the Noteholders or Note Owners, as applicable, about whether to direct the Asset Representations Reviewer to conduct a Review of the Review Receivables under the Asset Representations Review Agreement. In the case of a Note Owner, each demand must be accompanied by a certification from that Person that it is a Note Owner, together with at least one form of documentation evidencing its ownership of a Note, including a trade confirmation, account statement, letter from a broker or dealer or similar document. If the Noteholders or Note Owners of at least 5% of the aggregate Note Balance of the Notes demand a vote within 90 days of the filing of the Form 10-D reporting the occurrence of the Delinquency Trigger, the Indenture Trustee will promptly request a vote of the Noteholders or Note Owners of record as of the most recent Record Date and, in the case of Note Owners, through the Clearing Agency process. The vote will remain open until the 150th day after the filing of the Form 10-D. Assuming a voting quorum of the Noteholders or Note Owners holding at least 5% of the aggregate Note Balance of the Notes is reached, if the Noteholders or Note Owners of a majority of the Note Balance of Notes vote to direct a Review, the Indenture Trustee will promptly send a Review Notice to the Asset Representations Reviewer and the Servicer under the Asset Representations Review Agreement stating that the Noteholders or Note Owners have voted to direct the Asset Representations Reviewer to conduct the Review.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 11. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan.

  • Asset Representations Review Process Section 3.01 Asset Representations Review Notices and Identification of Review Receivables. On receipt of an Asset Representations Review Notice from the Seller according to Section 5.7 of the Receivables Purchase Agreement, the Asset Representations Reviewer will start an Asset Representations Review. The Servicer will provide the list of Review Receivables to the Asset Representations Reviewer promptly upon receipt of the Asset Representations Review Notice. The Asset Representations Reviewer will not be obligated to start, and will not start, an Asset Representations Review until an Asset Representations Review Notice and the related list of Review Receivables is received. The Asset Representations Reviewer is not obligated to verify (i) whether the conditions to the initiation of the Asset Representations Review and the issuance of an Asset Representations Review Notice described in Section 7.6 of the Indenture were satisfied or (ii) the accuracy or completeness of the list of Review Receivables provided by the Servicer.

  • Proposing Integration Activities in the Planning Submission No integration activity described in section 6.3 may be proposed in a CAPS unless the Funder has consented, in writing, to its inclusion pursuant to the process set out in section 6.3(b).

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by agreement, shall be reviewed by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration. Not later than thirty (30) calendar days after issuance of the final audit report, CONSULTANT may request a review by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration of unresolved audit issues. The request for review will be submitted in writing. Neither the pendency of a dispute nor its consideration by ALAMEDA CTC will excuse CONSULTANT from full and timely performance, in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT. CONSULTANT and subconsultants’ contracts, including cost proposals and ICRs, may be subject to audits or reviews such as, but not limited to, an AGREEMENT Audit, an Incurred Cost Audit, an ICR Audit, or a certified public accountant (“CPA”) ICR Audit Workpaper Review. If selected for audit or review, the AGREEMENT, cost proposal and ICR and related workpapers, if applicable, will be reviewed to verify compliance with 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31 and other related laws and regulations. In the instances of a CPA ICR Audit Workpaper Review it is CONSULTANT’s responsibility to ensure federal, state, or local government officials are allowed full access to the CPA’s workpapers including making copies as necessary. The AGREEMENT, cost proposal, and ICR shall be adjusted by CONSULTANT and approved by ALAMEDA CTC to conform to the audit or review recommendations. CONSULTANT agrees that individual terms of costs identified in the audit report shall be incorporated into the contract by this reference if directed by ALAMEDA CTC at its sole discretion. Refusal by CONSULTANT to incorporate audit or review recommendations, or to ensure that the federal, state, or local governments have access to CPA workpapers, will be considered a breach of contract terms and cause for termination of the AGREEMENT and disallowance of prior reimbursed costs.

  • Maintenance of Review Materials It will maintain copies of any Review Materials, Review Reports and other documents relating to a Review, including internal correspondence and work papers, for a period of at least two years after any termination of this Agreement.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!