Jumping to conclusions Sample Clauses

Jumping to conclusions general intelligence, and psychosis liability: findings from the multi-centre EU-GEI case-control study 46
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Jumping to conclusions. Jumping to conclusions (JTC) is a well-established reasoning and data gathering bias found in patients with psychosis (X. Xxxxxx et al., 2013; P. A. Xxxxxx & Xxxxxxx, 2013; So et al., 2016), which it is expressed in the tendency to require less information to make decisions and to make xxxxx decisions.
Sample 1
Jumping to conclusions beyond cognitive component of delusions Preliminary work in this field focused primarily on the association with delusions, although jumping to conclusions has been also found in non-deluded schizophrenia patients and after remission, in people at high risk of developing psychosis, and in first-degree relatives (Broome et al., 2007; Xxxxxx & Xxxxxxxx, 2005; Xxxxx et al., 2014; Xxx Xxxx et al., 2006). In the general population, the JTC bias has been found in around 20% of people, who display higher levels of delusional ideation, conviction in paranoid ideas, proneness to hallucinations and experiences of perceptual anomalies compared to individuals who are “not jumpers” (Xxxxxxx et al., 2008; Xxxx et al., 2015). Higher prevalence of jumping to conclusions bias has been also reported in First Episode Psychosis (FEP) (Xxxxxxx et al., 2015; X. Xxxxxx et al., 2011; X. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx et al., 2015; Xxxxxx et al., 2012). Furthermore, studies on FEP revealed the tendency to make xxxxx decisions as relatively independent of symptomatology; although Xxxxxxx (M. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx et al., 2015) found a significant difference in delusion severity between JTC groups and non-JTC; however this finding held only for the easy version of the beads task (85:15), not for the hard one (60:40).
Sample 1
Jumping to conclusions general intelligence, and psychosis liability: findings from the multi-centre EU-GEI case-control study This paper was published online in Psychological Medicine, 1-11 doi:10.1017/S003329171900357X Jumping To Conclusions, General Intelligence, And Psychosis Liability: Findings From The Multi-Centre EU-GEI Case-Control Study. Running title: Jumping to conclusions, cognition, and psychosis *Corresponding Author Giada Tripoli Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience 00 Xx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxx - Xxxxxx, XX0 0XX Email: xxxxx.xxxxxxx@xxx.xx.xx List of authors Giada Tripoli1*, Diego Quattrone2,3,4, Xxxxx Ferraro5, Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx-Anderson6, Victoria Rodriguez1, Caterina La Cascia5, Daniele La Barbera5, Crocettarachele Sartorio5, Ilaria Tarricone7, Domenico Berardi7, Andrei Szöke8, Xxxxx Arango9, Xxxxxx Tortelli10, Xxxxxx-Xxxxxx Llorca11, Lieuwe de Haan12, Eva Velthorst12,13, Xxxxx Bobes14, Xxxxxx Bernardo15, Xxxxx Sanjuán16, Xxxx Xxxx Santos17, Xxxxxx Arrojo18, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx Del-Ben19, Xxxxx Xxxxx Menezes20, Xxxx-Xxxx Selten21,22, EU-GEI WP2 Group†, Xxxxx B Jones23,24, Alex Richards25, Xxxxxxx O’Donovan25, Xxxx XX Rutten22, Xxx van Os1,22,26, Xxxxx Morgan6, Pak C Sham2,27, Xxxxx M Murray1, Xxxxxx K Murray23,24‡ & Xxxxx Di Forti2,3,4‡ ‡ Xxxxxx X Xxxxxx and Xxxxx Xx Xxxxx equally contributed to the supervision of the work and are joint last names. 1Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF, UK; 2Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, UK; 3National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, UK; 4South London and Maudsley NHS Mental Health Foundation Trust; 5Department of Experimental Biomedicine and Clinical Neuroscience, University of Palermo, Xxx X. Xx Xxxxxx 1, 90129 Palermo, Italy; 6Department of Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF, UK; 7 Department of Medical and Surgical Science, Psychiatry Unit, Xxxx Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Xxxxx Xxxxxx 0, 00000 Xxxxxxx, Xxxxx; 0XXXXXX, X000, Xxxxxx 00, 00 Xxxxxx xx Xxxxxxxx xx Xxxxxx xx Xxxxxxxx, 94010 Créteil, France; 9Department of Child and...
Sample 1

Related to Jumping to conclusions

  • Agreements Relating to Sentencing 10. The government agrees to recommend that the Court impose a sentence of imprisonment within the applicable guidelines range and to make no further recommendation concerning what sentence of imprisonment should be imposed.

  • Reporting to Work All Contractor personnel shall report to their appropriate supervisor upon arrival at a CCI work location. Contractor Management shall ensure that Contractor personnel are given safety orientations for familiarization with potential job site hazards and emergency procedures.

  • Returning to Work (a) Returning to work early

  • Our Liability for Failing to Make Transfers If we do not complete a transaction to or from the Card on time or in the correct amount according to our Agreement with you, we may be liable for your losses or damages. However, there are some exceptions. We will not be liable, for instance:

  • Obligations relating to Change in Ownership 5.3.1 The Concessionaire shall not undertake or permit any Change in Ownership, except with the prior approval of the Authority.

  • Suspension of Rules Relating to Recalcitrant Accounts The United States shall not require a Reporting [FATCA Partner] Financial Institution to withhold tax under section 1471 or 1472 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code with respect to an account held by a recalcitrant account holder (as defined in section 1471(d)(6) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code), or to close such account, if the U.S. Competent Authority receives the information set forth in paragraph 2 of Article 2 of this Agreement, subject to the provisions of Article 3 of this Agreement, with respect to such account.

  • Participating TO Obligations The Participating TO shall maintain the Participating TO’s Transmission System and the Participating TO’s Interconnection Facilities in a safe and reliable manner and in accordance with this LGIA.

  • Intentionally Left Blank 5.1.2 The Parties are each solely responsible for participation in and compliance with national network plans, including the National Network Security Plan and the Emergency Preparedness Plan.

  • Returning to Work After a Period of Parental Leave (a) An employee will notify of their intention to return to work after a period of parental leave at least four weeks prior to the expiration of the leave.

  • Arbitration, Damages, Jury Trial and Warranties The City does not ever accept binding arbitration or the payment of damages or penalties upon the occurrence of a contingency, and expressly denies such acceptance for this Agreement. The City never consents to a jury trial to resolve any disputes that may arise hereunder, and expressly denies such consent for this Agreement. Contractor waives its right to a jury trial to resolve any disputes that may arise hereunder. No provision of any document within the Agreement between the Parties will be given effect which attempts to exclude, modify, disclaim or otherwise attempt to limit implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!