Key Questions. Do the verification bodies have a valid accreditation certificate issued by the National Accreditation Body (KAN)? — Does the government appoint bodies to undertake the verification tasks? Is the mandate (and associated responsibilities) clear and in the public domain? — Are institutional roles and responsibilities clearly defined and applied? — Do the verification bodies have adequate resources for carrying out verification against the legality definition and the systems for controlling the timber supply chain? — Do the verification bodies have a fully documented management system that: — ensures its personnel have the necessary competence and experience to carry out effective verification? — applies internal control / supervision? — includes mechanisms to control conflicts of interest? — ensures transparency of the system? — defines and applies verification methodology?
Key Questions. After the first round of questionnaire and interviews with coordinators, the original interview guide of 50+ questions (Appendix D) was streamlined and reduced to a core of seven critical inquiries based on two criteria: 1) what kinds of questions can coordinators offer meaningful answers to? and 2) which questions are critical for understanding if and how WaterDiss2.0 can assist a project with further dissemination? This shortened guide will serve to standardize the interview approach and structure partner thoughts. The following list highlights the core questions and sub-questions. ▪ What are the project‟s outputs? o What is the quality of each output? o How read to use is each output? ▪ Who are the target audiences for each output? o What are their needs? o What is the project‟s relationship with them? ▪ How successful do you judge dissemination to be (were target audiences reached to a satisfactory level)? o What are the factors of this success? o What mix of dissemination means was used? o What were the main barriers to dissemination? ▪ Has the desired uptake of each output been achieved? ▪ What were the main barriers to uptake? o Characteristics of the output itself (patent process, readiness for use, etc)? o Characteristics of the target audiences (risk aversion, financial stability, etc)? o Characteristics of the dissemination plan (language, timing, tailoring)? o Characteristics of the project itself (structure, budget, etc)? ▪ In your opinion, what are the next steps for the project?
Key Questions. Does your daughter suffer a systemic or an anaphylactic reaction (see question 3 for definition) to their allergy? Yes ⬜ No ⬜
Key Questions. Each of you should ask yourself these questions:
Key Questions. Has the government appointed a verification body or bodies to undertake the verification tasks? Is the mandate (and associated responsibilities) clear and in the public domain?
Key Questions. Has your daughter been admitted to hospital due to asthma in the past 12 months? Yes ⬜ No ⬜
Key Questions. How many patients initiated the 3HP regimen? How many completed the 3HP regimen? How many stopped the 3HP regimen due to other reasons (e.g., adverse events)? Regional TB programs submit and initial MAR when a patient starts 3HP and an “ending” MAR is sent when a patient stops 3HP for any reason. See Table 10. Tennessee 12-Week Isoniazid/Rifapentine (3HP) Treatment Data 2017 - 2018 TB Infection (TBI) Cascade of Care Objective 1: By January 1, 2019, identify those patients with positive QuantiFERON Gold In-Tube or QuantiFERON-Plus (QFT) test result performed at the Tennessee Department of Health (TDH) Division of Laboratory Services (TDH State Lab) An extract was created from the state lab StarLIMS system of all QFT specimens processed for a determined time period. In 2018, there were 815 patients with a positive QFT result collected by a health department in Tennessee.
