Law Enforcement Cooperation. 1. The Parties shall facilitate cooperation among regional and international law enforcement authorities, agencies and services with a view to disrupting and dismantling transnational crime and terrorist threats common to them. Such cooperation shall contribute to crime prevention and shall comprise, inter alia, exchanges of views on legislative frameworks, as well as administrative and technical assistance aimed at strengthening the institutional and operational capabilities of law enforcement authorities and the exchange of information and measures related to investigations.
2. The Parties, recognising the importance of secure borders, shall strive to manage existing and future challenges affecting borders, pursuing an integrated border management approach. They shall promote legitimate cross-sectoral responses aiming at preventing, detecting and, where appropriate, repressing cross-border crime and other risks.
Law Enforcement Cooperation. The Parties agree to cooperate among law enforcement authorities, agencies and services and to contribute to disrupting and dismantling transnational crime threats common to the Parties. This cooperation may take the form of mutual assistance in investigations, sharing of investigation techniques, joint education and training of law enforcement personnel and any other type of joint activities and assistance as may be mutually determined by the Parties.
Law Enforcement Cooperation a. The Parties shall encourage and offer each other the fullest law enforcement cooperation possible in accordance with their respective national laws and policies, and on the basis of mutual respect for sovereignty, equality and mutual benefit; and
b. The Parties shall promote cooperation in accordance with their national laws in such fields as evidence gathering, tracing of crime proceeds, apprehension and repatriation of criminal fugitives and return of crime proceeds; and encourage each other to enter into bilateral legal arrangements therein.
Law Enforcement Cooperation. 1. The Parties shall strengthen dialogue and cooperation on law enforcement, including through strategic cooperation between AU bodies such as AFRIPOL and EU bodies such as EUROPOL, to facilitate the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of activities of transnational organised criminal and terrorist networks in the Africa region and the EU.
2. The Parties shall cooperate in the area of search and rescue, and in other emergency situations, and shall encourage states to conclude bilateral agreements in that context.
3. The Parties shall enhance cooperation on integrated border management and improve information and data gathering and sharing.
4. The Parties agree to work to enhance police capacities, including through targeted police training programmes at strategic, operational and tactical levels, adapted to the realities of the African context.
Law Enforcement Cooperation. XxXXX shall take reasonable steps to investigate and respond to any reports from law enforcement and governmental and quasi-governmental agencies of illegal or abusive conduct in connection with the use of the TLD. In responding to such reports, XxXXX will not be required to take any action in contravention of applicable law. XxXXX will, if requested, provide CERT Australia, (xxxxx://xxxx.xxx.xx/ ) read - only access to the TLD registry data on a continuous basis in order to assist them to prevent and mitigate abuse of the DNS.
Law Enforcement Cooperation. Unless otherwise required by applicable law, the Organization’s practice will be to require a valid, signed warrant prior to allowing any Law Enforcement including but not limited to, the police, the FBI, and ICE, to enter any facility owned or leased by the Organization where staff, contractors, or volunteers of the Organization work; provided that the Organization may authorize entry by the police or the FBI in emergency circumstances (i.e. medical emergency or a physical safety issue).
Law Enforcement Cooperation. Each Party may cooperate with law enforcement authorities and national security authorities to the full extent required or permitted by applicable Law in matters related to services provided by it under this Agreement, including, the production of records, the establishment of new lines or the installation of new services on an existing line to support law enforcement or national security operations, and the installation of wiretaps, trap-and-trace facilities and equipment, and dialed number recording facilities and equipment. A Party will not be obligated to inform the other Party or the other Party's End Users of actions taken in cooperating with law enforcement or national security authorities, except to the extent required by applicable Law.
Law Enforcement Cooperation. In recognition of the importance of effective cooperation to combat transnational crime that impacts upon the security of both Parties,
Law Enforcement Cooperation. Thousands of international agreements, bilateral and multilateral, provide for various forms of law enforcement cooperation. The CEC follows the traditional pattern, and it includes detailed provisions on the collection and preservation of evidence to be used in cyber-related prosecutions. Expanding the CEC regime to additional states and to additional forms of harmful conduct would enhance its effectiveness. This may only be possible, however, if CEC parties agree to join a regime formulated with the participation of non-European states whose support is critical to the successful prevention of cyberattacks and exploitation, and with their concerns in mind.56 It may also be appropriate (and useful in securing consensus) to exclude from any agreement to prohibit certain types of conduct those interceptions and other activities that do no injury to cyber infrastructure and stem from the failure of users to exercise reasonable care. As in most treaties calling for the extradition of alleged violators of specified laws of one party found in the territory of another party, member states of a cyber-security regime should be permitted to prosecute alleged violators rather than being required to extradite them. This authority enables a party to ensure that prohibited conduct is prosecuted without sending the individual involved to a state that might fail to provide a sufficiently high level of due process, that might impose unacceptably severe punishment, or for any other reason. In addition, each state could retain the right to treat alleged criminal behavior as immune from prosecution as political offenses or because non-prosecution is required by its national interests. For example, although virtually all states agreed to prohibit aircraft hijacking in treaties to protect civilian aviation, the U.S. and other parties have at times been unwilling to extradite or sometimes even to prosecute individuals for such a serious crime where, for example, the hijacking was done to escape unjust punishment by an oppressive regime. Some states will presumably be even less willing to cooperate in an international regime that strengthens the ability of undemocratic governments to prevent and punish political speech or otherwise restrict or deny fundamental human rights. A particularly interesting law-enforcement issue is whether states should agree to permit other par- ties to engage in limited, unilateral actions within their territories to prevent or investigate cyberattack...
Law Enforcement Cooperation. The Government of the Republic of the Xxxxxxxx Islands agrees to cooperate with the Government of the United States in any law enforcement action that the Government of the United States may undertake arising out of any employment involving an RMI citizen in the United States. Notwithstanding subsection (1) of section H of this Agreement, the Government of the Republic of the Xxxxxxxx Islands shall promptly provide the Government of the United States, upon request, with copies of all documents and information required under this Agreement in connection with any such law enforcement action undertaken by the Government of the United States.
