Line Outage Costs. Notwithstanding anything in the NYISO OATT to the contrary, the Connecting Transmission Owner may propose to recover line outage costs associated with the installation of Connecting Transmission Owner’s Attachment Facilities or System Upgrade Facilities or System Deliverability Upgrades on a case-by-case basis.
Line Outage Costs. Notwithstanding anything in Applicable Laws and Regulations to the contrary, NYSEG may propose to recover line outage costs associated with the installation of TrAILCo System Upgrade Facilities on a case‐by‐case basis; provided, however, NYSEG shall not have the right to recover line outage costs from TrAILCo if such line outage costs are caused by NYSEG’s Default under this Agreement.
Line Outage Costs. Notwithstanding anything in the ISO OATT to the contrary, Affected System Operator may propose to recover line outage costs associated with the installation of the Affected System Upgrade Facilities on a case-by-case basis.
Line Outage Costs. Notwithstanding any provision in the Tariff to the contrary, Connecting Transmission Owner may propose to recover line outage costs associated with the installation of Connecting Transmission Owner’s Attachment Facilities or System Upgrade Facilities on a case-by-case basis.
Line Outage Costs. Neither the Borrower nor any Project Company incurred any line outage costs under and pursuant to the Interconnection Agreement.
Line Outage Costs. A (Estimated Total Costs of Scheduled Transmission Line Outages) of Appendix A (Interconnection Facilities, Network Upgrades, and Distribution Upgrades) to the Interconnection Agreement sets forth the estimated total costs of scheduled transmission line outages. The United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit stated in Southern Company Services, Inc. v. FERC, 353 F.3d 29 (D.C. Cir. 2003), that transmission providers may recover line outage costs if the interconnection agreement specifically permits such recovery. The Commission acknowledged in Order No. 2003-A that the transmission provider may submit these costs to the Commission.6 Thus, Southern Companies are permitted to submit this provision as part of the Interconnection Agreement. Once approved, Southern Companies may collect costs and expenses incurred by or on behalf of Southern Companies that are caused by scheduled transmission line outages associated with interconnection of Interconnection Customer’s generating facility to Southern Companies’ transmission system. Subsequent to the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit’s order allowing recovery of line outage costs, the Commission has permitted Southern Companies to collect line outage costs in interconnection agreements.7 The Commission recognized that the categories of transmission line outage costs that Southern Companies may contractually recover under these interconnection agreements are as follows: (i) expenses associated with additional line losses; (ii) refunds to transmission customers; and (iii) redispatch costs.8 The language, methodologies, and categories included in Appendix A of the Interconnection Agreement are substantially the same as those that the Commission previously has approved. The estimated expenses associated with additional line losses are $13,000 (see Section 7.B.1 of Appendix A). There are no refunds to transmission customers and no re- dispatch costs (see Interconnection Agreement, Appendix A, Sections 7.B.2 5 See, e.g., Southern Company Services, Inc., 116 FERC ¶ 61,231, PP 31, 32 (2006). 6 Order No. 2003-A, P 647. 7 See orders approving methodology for line outage costs: Southern Company Services, Inc., 116 FERC ¶ 61,231, P 31 (2006); Southern Company Services, Inc., 111 FERC ¶ 61,423, PP 26, 28 (2005). 8 Id. Xx. Xxxxxxxx X. Bose, Secretary June 5, 2015 and 7.B.3).9 The Commission previously has approved Southern Companies’ collection of expenses associated with additional line losses.10
Line Outage Costs. Notwithstanding anything in the ISO OATT to the contrary, the Affected Transmission Owners may propose to recover line outage costs associated with the installation of the Common System Deliverability Upgrades on a case-by-case basis, subject to the SDU Cost Cap.
Line Outage Costs. Notwithstanding anything in the ISO OATT to the contrary, the Connecting Transmission Owner may propose to recover line outage costs associated with the installation of Connecting Transmission Owner’s Attachment Facilities or System Upgrade Facilities or System Deliverability Upgrades on a case-by-case basis.
Line Outage Costs. Notwithstanding anything in the NYISO OATT to the contrary, the Transmission Owner may propose to recover line outage costs associated with the installation of Transmission Owner’s Attachment Facilities or System Upgrade Facilities on a case-by-case basis. Issued by: Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx, President Effective: Issued on: April 26, 2004 Filed to comply with Order No. 2003-A of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Docket No. RM02-1-001, issued March 5, 2004, 106 FERC ¶ 61,220 (2004).
Line Outage Costs. Notwithstanding anything in the NYISO OATTApplicable Laws and Regulations to the contrary, the Connecting Transmission OwnerNYSEG may propose to recover line outage costs associated with the installation of Connecting Transmission Owner’s Attachment Facilities orTrAILCo System Upgrade Facilities or System Deliverability Upgrades on a case-by-case basis.on a case‐by‐case basis; provided, however, NYSEG shall not have the right to recover line outage costs from TrAILCo if such line outage costs are caused by NYSEG’s Default under this
