MS Degree Program Expectations Sample Clauses

MS Degree Program Expectations. The Human Nutrition Graduate Program Coordinator will assign each graduate student an academic advisor. The academic advisor will supervise the academic progress of the candidate from entrance to completion of the program. Students completing the non-thesis option are required to present evidence of critical thinking and writing skills in the form of a paper based on a scholarly project. This project may take a variety of forms, e.g., field study; case study; development and pilot testing of questionnaires, evaluation of instruments; development and evaluation of a specific worksite project; comprehensive literature review of a defined area of knowledge which identifies a current area of concern for analysis, generates hypotheses, suggests a methodology and statistical analysis for testing hypotheses, and/or develops a rationale for change in current practice. A written comprehensive examination will be administered upon completion of the majority of course requirements (excluding the scholarly project). The student should notify the Human Nutrition Graduate Program Coordinator in writing of his/her intent to take the comprehensive exam within the first two weeks of the semester in which the exam is to be scheduled. The examination will be developed by the student’s project advisor and two other faculty appointed by either the Department Chair or the Human Nutrition Graduate Program Coordinator. Sample study guide is available in the nutrition program office. A student who fails the comprehensive examination may petition for a re-exam at the next scheduled testing date and will receive suggestions for remediation. A Letter of Intent to Retake Exam should be submitted to the project advisor. The exam may not be taken a third time. Failure to pass the comprehensive exam will result in removal from the graduate program. Student will be notified in writing of successful completion of exam. Successful completion of the exam must also be reported by memo to the degree auditor in the university graduate office by the last day of classes.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to MS Degree Program Expectations

  • Service Level Expectations Without limiting any other requirements of the Agreement, the Service Provider shall meet or exceed the following standards, policies, and guidelines:

  • Performance Expectations The Charter School’s performance in relation to the indicators, measures, metrics and targets set forth in the CPF shall provide the basis upon which the SCSC will decide whether to renew the Charter School’s Charter Contract at the end of the charter term. This section shall not preclude the SCSC from considering other relevant factors in making renewal decisions.

  • Benchmarks 2.1 Benchmarks set forth the overall scope and level of responsibility and the typical duties by which jobs or positions are distinguished and classified under the Classification System. 2.2 Benchmarks also set forth the range or level of qualifications appropriate for a position classified to the level of the benchmark(s). 2.3 Benchmarks do not describe jobs or positions. They are used to classify a wide diversity of jobs by identifying the scope and level of responsibilities.

  • Program Objectives Implement a rigorous constructability program following The University of Texas System, Office of Facilities Planning and Construction Constructability Manual. Identify and document project cost and schedule savings (targeted costs are 5% of construction costs). Clarification of project goals, objectives.

  • Performance Indicators The HSP’s delivery of the Services will be measured by the following Indicators, Targets and where applicable Performance Standards. In the following table: INDICATOR CATEGORY INDICATOR P=Performance Indicator E=Explanatory Indicator M=Monitoring Indicator 2022/23 Organizational Health and Financial Indicators Debt Service Coverage Ratio (P) 1 ≥1 Total Margin (P) 0 ≥0 Coordination and Access Indicators Percent Resident Days – Long Stay (E) n/a n/a Wait Time from Home and Community Care Support Services (HCCSS) Determination of Eligibility to LTC Home Response (M) n/a n/a Long-Term Care Home Refusal Rate (E) n/a n/a Quality and Resident Safety Indicators Percentage of Residents Who Fell in the Last 30 days (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents Whose Pressure Ulcer Worsened (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents on Antipsychotics Without a Diagnosis of Psychosis (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents in Daily Physical Restraints (M) n/a n/a

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Claims Review Methodology ‌‌ a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject‌‌ to the Quarterly Claims Review.

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Program Goals CalHFA MAC envisions that these monies would be used to complement other federal or lender programs designed specifically to stabilize communities by providing assistance to homeowners who have suffered a financial hardship and as a result are no longer financially able to afford their first-lien mortgage loan payments or their Property Expenses when associated with a Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”) Home Equity Conversion Mortgages (“HECM”) loan, only.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!