NEPA Approval. Based on my review of information conveyed to me and in my possession the proposed action, as NEPA Compliance Officer (as authorized under DOE Order 451.1) I have determined that the proposed action fits within the specified actions, the other regulatory requirements set forth above are met, and the action is hereby excluded from further NEPA review. Approved By DOE NEPA Compliance Officer Xxxxxxx Xxxxx NEPA Review Summary Created By: Xxxxx, Xxxxxxx (CONTR) Date NEPA Review Initiated: 1/26/2023 Type of NEPA Review: Type B Project ID Number: M&O Recompete Title: Management and Operation Services Workflow Status: Approved If Workflow Status is Rejected, see below for Reason: Concurrence Details: Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx (XXXXX) FFPO Environmental Concurrence (Not required for Type A-DOE Only Record of NEPA Review or Type B-DOE Only Record of Categorical Exclusion Determination) Compliance Date Xxxxx, Xxxxxxx (CONTR) SPR Derivative Classifier (Only required for Type B) Compliance Date Xxxxx, Xxxx
NEPA Approval. All approvals of the HAP Contract, the Agency Commitment, and this Agreement pursuant to the National Environmental Protection Act shall have been obtained.
NEPA Approval. 3.1.1 NEPA Approval Prior to Contract Award MoDOT preferred procedure is to obtain NEPA approval for the best-value proposal prior to contract award. MoDOT prefers concepts that work within the approved NEPA document, as concepts outside of the approved NEPA document can impact the project schedule and confidentiality of the process. By eliminating the risk of environmental approvals, the Design Build teams will be able to reduce contingency and increase the value of their proposals; and the risk to MoDOT of publicly announcing a project that cannot be approved environmentally is eliminated. Obtaining FHWA approval of the NEPA document prior to contract award is highly encouraged by MoDOT. Because confidentiality remains critical during proposal submittal and evaluation, an expedited NEPA approval process aids in maintaining confidentiality of the proposals and apparent best-value proposal. To facilitate an expedited approval schedule, the MoDOT project team will FHWA - MoDOT Design Build Program Agreement DATE, 2013 provide detailed information on proposal elements that modify or change elements in the approved NEPA document to MoDOT environmental staff and FHWA for review during the Technical Discussion phase. A sample environmental commitment spreadsheet is attached in Appendix J. This will allow for a more organized review by MoDOT and FHWA of team proposal elements regarding environmental commitments. Requests for guidance concerning proposed modifications will be a priority for FHWA, and responses provided as soon as practical. MoDOT or its contractor will develop the NEPA re-evaluation document(s), if required, concurrent with the proposal evaluation process. Feedback, rejection, or approval of the NEPA re-evaluation document will be given as soon as practical, but no later than within 5 days of receipt of the re- evaluation document. If significant issues are noted, additional time may be required. It is understood that if outside resource agencies need to be consulted, the NEPA review and approval process may be prolonged. Written responses to all FHWA provided comments will be required within 3 days of receipt of comments. FHWA approval of the NEPA re-evaluation document will be provided after all review comments have been resolved to FHWA satisfaction and revised Conceptual Access Justification Report (AJR) approval.
NEPA Approval. 40 The Governmental Approvals that ADOT is responsible for acquiring (ADOT-provided 41 approvals), and their status, are set forth in Table 420-2. The ADOT-provided approvals are 42 based on the ADOT Final L/DCR that is provided in the RIDs. Copies of ADOT-provided 43 approvals that ADOT has already secured are provided in the RIDs. Table 420-2 ADOT-Provided Approvals TP Attachment Governmental Entity ADOT-Provided Approval Status Availability Date 000-0 XXXX Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx (Xxxx 202) Interstate 10 (Papago Freeway) to Interstate 10 (Maricopa Freeway) Final Environmental Impact Statement and Section 4(f) Evaluation, and Record of Decision (ROD) (“NEPA Approval”) Executed September 26, 2014; March 13, 2015 1 Developer acknowledges and agrees that changes to the Schematic ROW or incorporation of 2 Developer-Designated ROW into the Project may require re-evaluation, amendment, or
NEPA Approval. Xxxxx will prepare a draft Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) Form addressing the preferred alternative. Xxxxx will work with the City to submit the draft PES Form to Caltrans DLA. A field meeting will be scheduled with Helix, City, and Xxxxxxxx to discuss relevant environmental issues, and the draft PES Form. Helix will revise the PES Forms based on input from the field meeting and work with the City to resubmit to Caltrans DLA. It is assumed the project will qualify for a “Categorical Exclusion with technical studies.” One additional review cycle of the PES Form based on Caltrans DLA comments is included. Caltrans DLA will prepare and process the CE form following approval of the supporting technical studies and the City completing the CEQA process.
