PEER COMPONENT Sample Clauses

PEER COMPONENT. CONTRACTOR shall ensure that service provisions at all levels shall include a peer component. CONTRACTOR shall identify and train peers who will actively outreach and engage program Participants.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (7)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
PEER COMPONENT. In our architecture, the component of the di erent types of peers are as follows: an ontology engineering tool used to develop and maintain the common ontology. a book keeping component for managing the member peers of the community. a collection of local data. an XML wrapper to convert between local data and higher level model. an export schema tool to help the administrator in developing the subset of the local schema that is shared with other peers. Query response is a function for handling query, negotiation and for constructing and sending respons. a knowledge discover/concept adjustment tool used to related the peer concepts to common ontology. a query management which is a block used to write, re-write, send, re-send, and negotiate. a respond management which is a block used to receive and inte- grate the answer of query.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
PEER COMPONENT. In accordance with Section 87663 of the California Education Code, a "peer review" of faculty performance shall be included in every evaluation. 5.3.1.1. For purposes of evaluation, a "peer" is defined as a tenured faculty member who teaches in the subject area in the evaluee’s department. When this requirement cannot be met, then the peer shall be drawn from a related discipline at either college. 5.3.1.2. For purposes of evaluation, a "review" is defined as an observation of a teaching situation (laboratory, lecture) or other student contact situation (counseling, library orientation, etc.) for at least fifty (50) minutes and an assessment of compliance with the evaluee's responsibilities as stated in the job description or, in the case of tenured faculty, options for "review" are defined in 5.5.2.2.
Sample 1
PEER COMPONENT. 5.6.2.1. For purposes of evaluation, a "peer" is defined as the Department Chair/Coordinator or full-time designee consistent with the definition stipulated in Subsection 5.3.1.1. 5.6.2.2. For purposes of evaluation, a "review" is defined in Subsection
Sample 1
PEER COMPONENT. 5.5.2.1. The selection of the Peer Reviewer shall be made by the appropriate administrator in consultation with the Department Chair/Coordinator from a list of two (2) peers, as defined in section 5.3.1.1, chosen by the evaluee. 5.5.2.2. The Peer Review of a tenured faculty member shall be: (1) a standard "review" as defined in subsection 5.3.1.2., employing the Evaluation Form appropriate to the position title (see Appendix H). The evaluator will summarize observations on the Evaluation Form and will give the evaluee a single summary rating on a five-point scale. or (2) a review based on an assessment of a present or proposed special project, initiated by the evaluee and agreed upon by the Department and appropriate administrator. Such a project will aim to strengthen the evaluee’s teaching skills/resources or other activities that also further the vision and mission of departments, colleges, and District. Examples include, but are not limited to: (a) development of discussion-leading skills; (b) development of lecturing skills; (c) incorporation of non-print media presentations; (d) development of multimedia resources; (e) authoring a text; (f) curriculum development--developing new courses, significantly restructuring old ones; (g) development of alternative delivery systems. In case of an evaluation based on the above, the Peer Review will include (1) a brief description of the project, written by the evaluee, and (2) the peer assessment of the project or activity.
Sample 1
PEER COMPONENT. CONTRACTOR shall ensure that service provisions at all levels shall 13 engage program Participants.
Sample 1

Related to PEER COMPONENT

  • Usage Measurement Usage measurement for calls shall begin when answer supervision or equivalent Signaling System 7 (SS7) message is received from the terminating office and shall end at the time of call disconnect by the calling or called subscriber, whichever occurs first.

  • Performance Measurement The Uniform Guidance requires completion of OMB-approved standard information collection forms (the PPR). The form focuses on outcomes, as related to the Federal Award Performance Goals that awarding Federal agencies are required to detail in the Awards.

  • Mileage Measurement Where required, the mileage measurement for LIS rate elements is determined in the same manner as the mileage measurement for V&H methodology as outlined in NECA Tariff No. 4.

  • Power Factor Design Criteria Developer shall design the Large Generating Facility to maintain an effective power delivery at demonstrated maximum net capability at the Point of Interconnection at a power factor within the range established by the Connecting Transmission Owner on a comparable basis, until NYISO has established different requirements that apply to all generators in the New York Control Area on a comparable basis. The Developer shall design and maintain the plant auxiliary systems to operate safely throughout the entire real and reactive power design range. The Connecting Transmission Owner shall not unreasonably restrict or condition the reactive power production or absorption of the Large Generating Facility in accordance with Good Utility Practice.

  • Performance Measure Grantee will adhere to the performance measures requirements documented in

  • Measuring EPP parameters Every 5 minutes, EPP probes will select one “IP address” of the EPP servers of the TLD being monitored and make an “EPP test”; every time they should alternate between the 3 different types of commands and between the commands inside each category. If an “EPP test” result is undefined/unanswered, the EPP service will be considered as unavailable from that probe until it is time to make a new test.

  • Performance Adjustment Rate Except as otherwise provided in sub-paragraph (e) of this paragraph 3, the Performance Adjustment Rate is 0.02% for each percentage point (the performance of the Portfolio and the Index each being calculated to the nearest .01%) that the Portfolio's investment performance for the performance period was better or worse than the record of the Index as then constituted. The maximum performance adjustment rate is 0.20%. For purposes of calculating the performance adjustment of the portfolio, the portfolio's investment performance will be based on the performance of the retail class. The performance period will commence with the first day of the first full month following the retail class's commencement of operations. During the first eleven months of the performance period for the retail class, there will be no performance adjustment. Starting with the twelfth month of the performance period, the performance adjustment will take effect. Following the twelfth month a new month will be added to the performance period until the performance period equals 36 months. Thereafter the performance period will consist of the current month plus the previous 35 months. The Portfolio's investment performance will be measured by comparing (i) the opening net asset value of one share of the retail class of the Portfolio on the first business day of the performance period with (ii) the closing net asset value of one share of the retail class of the Portfolio as of the last business day of such period. In computing the investment performance of the retail class of the Portfolio and the investment record of the Index, distributions of realized capital gains, the value of capital gains taxes per share paid or payable on undistributed realized long-term capital gains accumulated to the end of such period and dividends paid out of investment income on the part of the Portfolio, and all cash distributions of the securities included in the Index, will be treated as reinvested in accordance with Rule 205-1 or any other applicable rules under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as the same from time to time may be amended.

  • Combination Product The term “

  • Measurement method An isolation resistance test instrument is connected between the live parts and the electrical chassis. The isolation resistance is subsequently measured by applying a DC voltage at least half of the working voltage of the high voltage bus. If the system has several voltage ranges (e.g. because of boost converter) in conductively connected circuit and some of the components cannot withstand the working voltage of the entire circuit, the isolation resistance between those components and the electrical chassis can be measured separately by applying at least half of their own working voltage with those components disconnected.

  • Staffing Levels To the extent legislative appropriations and PIN authorizations allow, safe staffing levels will be maintained in all institutions where employees have patient, client, inmate or student care responsibilities. In July of each year, the Secretary or Deputy Secretary of each agency will, upon request, meet with the Union, to hear the employees’ views regarding staffing levels. In August of each year, the Secretary or Deputy Secretary of Budget and Management will, upon request, meet with the Union to hear the employees’ views regarding the Governor’s budget request.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!