PERFORMANCE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT Sample Clauses

PERFORMANCE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT. 5.1.1 The review of the Authorities‟ performance under this Contract will be carried out by a Performance Contract Review Committee (PCRC) comprising of three members. One from the Regulation Unit of the Directorate of Water Development (DWD), one relevant official from the Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development (MFPED) and one from the Ministry of Local Government (MLG), who shall be named within two (2) months of the signing of the contract. 5.1.2 The Committee will specifically address the following: a) Authorities‟ performance against specific indicators, which will be reviewed quarterly by the Regulation Unit (RU) of MWE and annually by the PCRC However the RU can call for a special meeting of the PCRC; b) Provide for the resetting of targets/projections, should it prove necessary; c) Consider proposals for the re-assessment of targets if there is a significant change in the environment or significant new factors; d) Any other issues that may from time to time be raised by the parties. 5.1.3 The PCRC may decide to appoint Consultants to assist in the review process. 5.1.4 The report and recommendations of the PCRC following the annual reviews will be submitted to both MWE and the WSSB within a period of 30 days after the review. 5.1.5 The review methodology used by the PCRC or its Consultants is specified in the Fifth Schedule.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
PERFORMANCE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT. 13.1. A Sub-Committee of the NWSC reform steering committee will be constituted to review the contract. This Performance Contract Review Sub-Committee (PCRC) will be constituted by the NWSC reform steering committee and will include at least the following members; 13.1.1. one representative of the Ministry of Finance 13.1.2. one representative of the Ministry of Water, Lands and Environment 13.1.3. one external director of the NWSC Board. 13.2. The PCRC sub-committee should be constituted at the time of signing the contract. Responsibilities of the PCRC will include; 13.2.1. Performance against specific indicators will be reviewed quarterly. The continued financial viability of NWSC must, at all times, be mandatory; 13.2.2. Provide for the resetting of targets/projections, should it prove necessary. 13.2.3. Parties may, by agreement, meet at any time to review/update targets if there is a significant change in the environment or significant new factors; 13.2.4. The PCRC may agree to use Consultants to assist in the review process. 13.3. The report and recommendations of the PCRC following the quarterly and annual reviews will be submitted to both GOU and the NWSC Board within a period of 14 days after the reviews. 13.4. Overall Performance Targets are set out in Appendix. I 13.5. Senior Management reward structure: 13.5.1. The Top management team of NWSC is accountable to the NWSC Board for the achievement of the Corporate Plan Objectives and the financial performance objectives set out in this Performance Contract. 13.5.2. The reward structure for the Top management team will include a performance incentive element of 25% of annual basic salary. The Board, in deciding the appropriate bonus rate to apply in any year, will give due weight to the achievement of the targets set out in this Contract.
PERFORMANCE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT. 5.1.1 7KH UHYLHZ RI WKH $XWKRULWoLntHracVt ¶will SbeHcUarIrieRd UouPt DbyQFa H XQG Performance Contract Review Committee (PCRC) comprising of three members. One from the Regulation Unit of the Directorate of Water Development (DWD), one relevant official from the Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development (MFPED) and one from the Ministry of Local Government (MLG), who shall be named within two (2) months of the signing of the contract. 5.1.2 The Committee will specifically address the following: a) $XWKRUpeLrfoWrmLaHncVe ¶against specific indicators, which will be reviewed quarterly by the Regulation Unit (RU) of MWE and annually by the PCRC However the RU can call for a special meeting of the PCRC; b) Provide for the resetting of targets/projections, should it prove necessary; c) Consider proposals for the re-assessment of targets if there is a significant change in the environment or significant new factors; d) Any other issues that may from time to time be raised by the parties. 5.1.3 The PCRC may decide to appoint Consultants to assist in the review process. 5.1.4 The report and recommendations of the PCRC following the annual reviews will be submitted to both MWE and the WSSB within a period of 30 days after the review. 5.1.5 The review methodology used by the PCRC or its Consultants is specified in the Fifth Schedule.

Related to PERFORMANCE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

  • Performance Management 17.1 The Contractor will appoint a suitable Account Manager to liaise with the Authority’s Strategic Contract Manager. Any/all changes to the terms and conditions of the Agreement will be agreed in writing between the Authority’s Strategic Contract Manager and the Contractor’s appointed representative. 17.2 The Contractor will ensure that there will be dedicated resources to enable the smooth running of the Framework Agreement and a clear plan of contacts at various levels within the Contractor's organisation. Framework Public Bodies may look to migrate to this Framework Agreement as and when their current contractual arrangements expire. The Contractor will where necessary assign additional personnel to this Framework Agreement to ensure agreed service levels are maintained and to ensure a consistent level of service is delivered to all Framework Public Bodies. 17.3 In addition to annual meetings with the Authority's Strategic Contract Manager, the Contractor is expected to develop relationships with nominated individuals within each of the Framework Public Bodies to ensure that the level of service provided on a local basis is satisfactory. Where specific problems are identified locally, the Contractor will attempt to resolve such problems with the nominated individual within that organisation. The Authority's Strategic Contract Manager will liaise (or meet as appropriate) regularly with the Framework Public Bodies' Contract Manager, and where common problems are identified, it will be the responsibility of the Contractor to liaise with the Authority's Strategic Contract Manager to agree a satisfactory course of action. Where the Contractor becomes aware of a trend that would have a negative effect on one or more of the Framework Public Bodies, they should immediately notify the Authority's Strategic Contract Manager to discuss corrective action. 17.4 Regular meetings, frequency to be advised by Framework Public Body, will be held between the Framework Public Bodies' Contract Manager and the Contractor's representative to review the performance of their Call-Off Contract(s) under this Framework Agreement against the agreed service levels as measured through Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). Reports will be provided by the Contractor to the Framework Public Bodies' Contract Manager at least 14 days prior to the these meetings. 17.5 Performance review meetings will also be held annually, between the Authority's Strategic Contract Manager and the Contractor's representative to review the performance of the Framework Agreement against the agreed service levels as measured through Key Performance Indicators. A summary of the quarterly reports will be provided by the Contractor at least 14 days prior to these meetings. 17.6 The Authority will gather the outputs from contract management to review under the areas detailed in the table below. Provision of management reports 90% to be submitted within 10 working days of the month end Report any incident affecting the delivery of the Service(s) to the Framework Public Body 100% to be reported in writing to FPB within 24 hours of the incident being reported by telephone/email Prompt payment of sub-contractors and/or consortia members (if applicable). Maximum of 30 from receipt of payment from Framework Public Bodies, 10 days target 100% within 30 days

  • PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 6.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) to this Agreement sets out – 6.1.1 The standards and procedures for evaluating the Employee’s performance; and 6.1.2 The intervals for the evaluation of the Employee’s performance. 6.2 Despite the establishment of agreed intervals for evaluation, the Employer may in addition review the Employee’s performance at any stage while the contract of employment remains in force; 6.3 Personal growth and development needs identified during any performance review discussion must be documented in a Personal Development Plan as well as the actions agreed to and implementation must take place within set time frames; 6.4 The Employee’s performance will be measured in terms of contributions to the goals and strategies set out in the Employer’s Integrated Development Plan (IDP) as described in 6.6 – 6.12 below; 6.5 The Employee will submit quarterly performance reports (SDBIP) and a comprehensive annual performance report at least one week prior to the performance assessment meetings to the Evaluation Panel Chairperson for distribution to the panel members for preparation purposes; 6.6 Assessment of the achievement of results as outlined in the performance plan: 6.6.1 Each KPI or group of KPIs shall be assessed according to the extent to which the specified standards or performance targets have been met and with due regard to ad-hoc tasks that had to be performed under the KPI, and the score of the employer will be given to and explained to the Employee during the assessment interview. 6.6.2 A rating on the five-point scale shall be provided for each KPI or group of KPIs which will then be multiplied by the weighting to calculate the final score; 6.6.3 The Employee will submit his self-evaluation to the Employer prior to the formal assessment; 6.6.4 In the instance where the employee could not perform due to reasons outside the control of the employer and employee, the KPI will not be considered during the evaluation. The employee should provide sufficient evidence in such instances; and 6.6.5 An overall score will be calculated based on the total of the individual scores calculated above.

  • Contract Management To ensure full performance of the Contract and compliance with applicable law, the System Agency may take actions including: a. Suspending all or part of the Contract; b. Requiring the Grantee to take specific corrective actions in order to remain in compliance with term of the Contract; c. Recouping payments made to the Grantee found to be in error; d. Suspending, limiting, or placing conditions on the continued performance of the Project; e. Imposing any other remedies authorized under this Contract; and f. Imposing any other remedies, sanctions or penalties permitted by federal or state statute, law, regulation, or rule.

  • Performance Monitoring ‌ A. Performance Monitoring of Subrecipient by County, State of California and/or HUD shall consist of requested and/or required written reporting, as well as onsite monitoring by County, State of California or HUD representatives. B. County shall periodically evaluate Subrecipient’s progress in complying with the terms of this Contract. Subrecipient shall cooperate fully during such monitoring. County shall report the findings of each monitoring to Subrecipient. C. County shall monitor the performance of Subrecipient against the goals, outcomes, milestones and performance standards required herein. Substandard performance, as determined by County, will constitute non-compliance with this Contract for which County may immediately terminate the Contract. If action to correct such substandard performance is not taken by Subrecipient within the time period specified by County, payment(s) will be denied in accordance with the provisions contained in this Paragraph 47 of this Contract. D. HUD in accordance with 24 CFR Part 570 Subpart O, 570.902, will annually review the performance of County to determine whether County has carried out its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) assisted activities in a timely manner and has significantly disbursed CDBG funds and met the mandated “1.5 ratio” threshold. Subrecipient is responsible to ensure timely drawdown of funds.

  • Performance Review Where a performance review of an employee’s performance is carried out, the employee shall be given sufficient opportunity after the interview to read and review the performance review. Provision shall be made on the performance review form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee’s signature in two (2) places, one (1) indicating that the employee has read and accepts the performance review, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the performance review. The employee shall sign in only one (1) of the places provided. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of a performance review unless the signature indicates disagreement. An employee shall, upon request, receive a copy of this performance review at the time of signing. An employee’s performance review shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure of this Agreement. The employee may respond, in writing, to the performance review. Such response will be attached to the performance review.

  • Program Management 1.1.01 Implement and operate an Immunization Program as a Responsible Entity 1.1.02 Identify at least one individual to act as the program contact in the following areas: 1. Immunization Program Manager;

  • Project Management Plan 3.2.1 Developer is responsible for all quality assurance and quality control activities necessary to manage the Work, including the Utility Adjustment Work. Developer shall undertake all aspects of quality assurance and quality control for the Project and Work in accordance with the approved Project Management Plan, Good Industry Practice and applicable Law. 3.2.2 Developer shall develop the Project Management Plan and its component parts, plans and other documentation in accordance with the requirements set forth in Section 1.5.2.5

  • STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM If the maximum amount payable to Contractor under this Contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at any time thereafter, this section shall apply. Contractor agrees to be governed by and comply with the provisions of §§00-000-000, 00-000-000, 00-000-000, and 00- 000-000, C.R.S. regarding the monitoring of vendor performance and the reporting of contract information in the State’s contract management system (“Contract Management System” or “CMS”). Contractor’s performance shall be subject to evaluation and review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Contract, Colorado statutes governing CMS, and State Fiscal Rules and State Controller policies.

  • City’s Contract Manager The City’s contract manager for this Approved Service Order is: Name: Xxxxxx Xxxx Phone No.: (000) 000-0000 Department: HR E-mail: Xxxxxx.xxxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx Address: 000 X. Xxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx, 4th Floor San Jose, CA 95113

  • Performance Reviews The Employee will be provided with a written performance appraisal at least once per year and said appraisal will be reviewed at which time all aspects of the assessment can be fully discussed.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!