Performance Review for Criteria Architect Sample Clauses

Performance Review for Criteria Architect. The Judicial Council or its agent may evaluate Criteria Architect’s performance under this Agreement. Such evaluation may include assessing Criteria Architect’s compliance with all Agreement terms and performance standards. Any deficiencies in the Criteria Architect’s performance that the Judicial Council reasonably determines are severe or continuing and compromises the quality of Criteria Architect’s Work if not corrected, will be reported to the Criteria Architect’s principal. The report may include recommended improvements and corrective measures to be taken by the Criteria Architect. If the Criteria Architect’s performance remains unsatisfactory as determined by the Judicial Council in its sole discretion, the Judicial Council may, without limitation, terminate this Agreement for cause or impose other penalties as specified in this Agreement. Any evaluation of Criteria Architect’s performance conducted by the Judicial Council shall not be construed as an Acceptance of the Criteria Architect’s work product or methods of performance. Criteria Architect shall be solely responsible for the quality, completeness, and accuracy of the work product that Criteria Architect and its Sub-Consultants deliver under this Agreement. Criteria Architect shall not rely on Judicial Council to perform any quality control review of Criteria Architect’s work product, as such review shall be conducted by Criteria Architect.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (21)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Performance Review for Criteria Architect

  • Performance Review Where a performance review of an employee’s performance is carried out, the employee shall be given sufficient opportunity after the interview to read and review the performance review. Provision shall be made on the performance review form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee’s signature in two (2) places, one (1) indicating that the employee has read and accepts the performance review, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the performance review. The employee shall sign in only one (1) of the places provided. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of a performance review unless the signature indicates disagreement. An employee shall, upon request, receive a copy of this performance review at the time of signing. An employee’s performance review shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure of this Agreement. The employee may respond, in writing, to the performance review. Such response will be attached to the performance review.

  • Performance of Reviews The RIRs shall send a request for review to the Operator per email, where they shall specify the areas they request a review for. The Operator must comply with the request by providing the requested information within five working days. The review may include an onsite inspection. In this case the RIRs and the Operator must agree on a specific date for the inspection to take place, which may not be later than sixty calendar days from the date of the request.

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • Performance Monitoring ‌ A. Performance Monitoring of Subrecipient by County, State of California and/or HUD shall consist of requested and/or required written reporting, as well as onsite monitoring by County, State of California or HUD representatives. B. County shall periodically evaluate Subrecipient’s progress in complying with the terms of this Contract. Subrecipient shall cooperate fully during such monitoring. County shall report the findings of each monitoring to Subrecipient. C. County shall monitor the performance of Subrecipient against the goals, outcomes, milestones and performance standards required herein. Substandard performance, as determined by County, will constitute non-compliance with this Contract for which County may immediately terminate the Contract. If action to correct such substandard performance is not taken by Subrecipient within the time period specified by County, payment(s) will be denied in accordance with the provisions contained in this Paragraph 47 of this Contract. D. HUD in accordance with 24 CFR Part 570 Subpart O, 570.902, will annually review the performance of County to determine whether County has carried out its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) assisted activities in a timely manner and has significantly disbursed CDBG funds and met the mandated “1.5 ratio” threshold. Subrecipient is responsible to ensure timely drawdown of funds.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!