Plaintiffs and Class Counsel shall not discuss the Agreement, its terms, or the facts and circumstances giving rise to the Released Claims with any of Harmless Harvest’s competitors or with any organizations or individuals within Harmless Harvest’s supply chain, including without limitation any Harmless Harvest customers, brokers, distributors or retail stores.
Plaintiffs and Class Counsel s Support of the Settlement: Plaintiffs as Class Representatives and Class Counsel support the Settlement. Their reasons include the risk of denial of class certification and a trial on the merits, the inherent delays and uncertainties associated with litigation, and the possibility that the Class is not entitled to any recovery. Based on their experience litigating similar cases, Class Counsel believe that further proceedings in this case, including a trial and probable appeals, would be very expensive and protracted. No one can confidently predict how the various legal questions at issue, including the amount of damages, would ultimately be resolved. Therefore, upon careful consideration of all of the facts and circumstances of this case, Class Counsel believe that the Settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. WHAT ARE MY RIGHTS AS A CLASS MEMBER?
Plaintiffs and Class Counsel. (1) have examined and considered the benefits to be provided to Class Members under this Agreement (the "Settlement," as defined below); (2) have considered the applicable law and the claims that have been and could have been asserted in the Complaint arising out of or relating to the prosecution of persons by Silver & Xxxxxx LLP on behalf of the City; and (3) believe the Settlement to be fair, reasonable, and adequate, and in the best interest of the Certified Class, taking into account the benefits provided to the members of the Certified Class through the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the decisions rendered in the Action, the risks of litigation, and the length of time that would be required to complete the litigation and any appeals.
Plaintiffs and Class Counsel. (1) have examined and considered the benefits to be provided to Class Members and Sub-Class Members under the settlement provided for in this Agreement (the “Settlement”); (2) have considered the laws of California and the claims that have been and could be asserted relating to the classification of the members of the Certified Class and the Certified Sub-Class as independent contractors; and (3) believe the Settlement to be fair, reasonable, and adequate, and in the best interest of the Certified Class and the Certified Sub-Class, taking into account the benefits provided to the members of the Certified Class and the Certified Sub-Class through the terms of the Settlement, the decisions rendered in the Lawsuit, the risks of litigation, and the length of time that would be required to complete the litigation and any appeals.
Plaintiffs and Class Counsel. Name of Authorized Signatory: Signature of Authorized Signatory: Xxxxx Xxxx (xxx Xxxxxx), on behalf of herself and the Class Name of Authorized Signatory: Signature of Authorized Signatory: Xxxxxx Xxxxx Name of Authorized Signatory: Signature of Authorized Signatory: Xxxxx-Xxxxx X’Connell Name of Authorized Signatory: Signature of Authorized Signatory: Rice Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx LLP Name of Authorized Signatory: Signature of Authorized Signatory: Merchant Law Group LLP APOTEX INC. Name of Authorized Signatory: Signature of Authorized Signatory: LABORATORIOS XXXX XXXXX Name of Authorized Signatory: Signature of Authorized Signatory: Schedule “A” – COMMON ISSUES FOR SETTLEMENT PURPOSES The Plaintiff seeks certification of the following common issues for settlement purposes only:
Plaintiffs and Class Counsel believe this Agreement provides benefits to the Settlement Class, is fair, reasonable and adequate, and is in the best interests of Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class Members.
Plaintiffs and Class Counsel. (1) have examined and considered the benefits to be provided to Class Members under the settlement provided for in this Agreement (the “Settlement,” as defined below); (2) have considered the applicable law and the claims that have been and could have been asserted in the Class Action Complaint arising out of or relating to the allegations of misclassification of the members of the Settlement Class as independent contractors; and
