Process for Addressing Criticism Sample Clauses

Process for Addressing Criticism a. The process for addressing criticism or concerns brought to an administrator regarding a specific teacher is: i. Step 1: Contact the teacher about whom the concern was raised to discuss the concern and the administrator’s initial judgment about the seriousness of it. ii. Step 2: The administrator may then choose to consider the investigation into the matter completed or conduct additional investigation into the matter and shall communicate this information to the teacher. iii. When reasonably necessary, the building administrator may not follow the above process. For example, to comply with the law, to respond to requests from law enforcement, to comply with a court order, or when no specific individual is attributed to the criticism or concern. iv. The intent of this section is to ensure that concerns are addressed in a timely manner and that the parties involved are aware of the process for considering the concern. b. In addition to the above, the teacher will be given written notice of, and have the right to respond to, any material or information which is critical or negative in any nature concerning the teacher, and to be advised of the source of any such information, before such material or information may be used in any formal process involving matters such as reprimand, discipline, suspension, reduction in compensation, transfer, evaluation or termination. Under certain circumstances, the identity of the source of critical or negative material may be kept confidential if the administrator has an objective basis to believe that the release of the identity would be detrimental to the health or safety of the source. While information from anonymous sources can be provided to the teacher, such information will not be used in any of the formal processes identified in the previous paragraph.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Process for Addressing Criticism. The process for addressing criticism or concerns brought to an administrator regarding a specific SSP employee is: i. Step 1: Contact the SSP employee about whom the concern was raised to discuss the concern and the administrator’s initial judgment about the seriousness of it. ii. Step 2: The administrator may then choose to consider the investigation into the matter completed or conduct additional investigation into the matter and shall communicate this information to the SSP employee. iii. When reasonably necessary, the building administrator may not follow the above process. For example, to comply with the law, to respond to requests from law enforcement, to comply with a court order or when no specific individual is attributed to the criticism or concern. iv. The intent of this section is to ensure that concerns are addressed in a timely manner and that the parties involved are aware of the process for considering the concern.
Process for Addressing Criticism a. The process for addressing criticism or concerns brought to an administrator regarding a specific teacher is: i. Step 1: Contact the teacher about whom the concern was raised to discuss the concern and the administrator’s initial judgment about the seriousness of it. ii. Step 2: The administrator may then choose to consider the investigation into the matter completed or conduct additional investigation into the matter and shall communicate this information to the teacher.
Process for Addressing Criticism a. The process for addressing criticism or concerns brought to an administrator regarding a specific mental health employee is: i. Step 1: Contact the mental health employee about whom the concern was raised to discuss the concern and the administrator’s initial judgment about the seriousness of it. ii. Step 2: The administrator may then choose to consider the investigation into the matter completed or conduct additional investigation into the matter and shall communicate this information to the mental health employee. iii. When reasonably necessary, the building administrator may not follow the above process. For example, to comply with the law, to respond to requests from law enforcement, to comply with a court order or when no specific individual is attributed to the criticism or concern. iv. The intent of this section is to ensure that concerns are addressed in a timely manner and that the parties involved are aware of the process for considering the concern. b. In addition to the above, the mental health employee will be given written notice of, and have the right to respond to, any material or information which is critical or negative in any nature concerning the mental health employee, and to be advised of the source of any such information, before such material or information may be used in any formal process involving matters such as reprimand, discipline, suspension, reduction in compensation, transfer, evaluation or termination. Under certain circumstances, the identity of the source of critical or negative material may be kept confidential if the administrator has an objective basis to believe that the release of the identity would be detrimental to the health or safety of the source. While information from anonymous sources can be provided to the mental health employee, such information will not be used in any of the formal processes identified in the previous paragraph.
Process for Addressing Criticism. 1. The process for addressing criticism or concerns brought to an administrator regarding a specific nurse is: a. Step 1: Contact the nurse about whom the concern was raised to discuss the concern and the administrator’s initial judgment about the seriousness of it.

Related to Process for Addressing Criticism

  • Penalties for Non-compliance to Service Level Agreement Where the Supplier/Service Provider fails to deliver the Goods/Services within the agreed and accepted milestone timelines and provided that the cause of the delay was not due to a fault of Transnet, penalties shall be imposed at …………………………………………………… .

  • Compliance Matters (a) The Sub-Adviser understands and agrees that it is a “service provider” to the Trust as contemplated by Rule 38a-1 under the 1940 Act. As such, the Sub-Adviser agrees to cooperate fully with the Adviser and the Trust and its Trustees and officers, including the Fund’s CCO, with respect to (i) any and all compliance-related matters, and (ii) the Trust’s efforts to assure that each of its service providers adopts and maintains policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to prevent violation of the “federal securities laws” (as that term is defined by Rule 38a-1) by the Trust, the Adviser and the Sub-Adviser. In this regard, the Sub-Adviser shall: (1) submit to the Board for its consideration and approval, prior to the effective date of this Agreement, the Sub-Adviser’s compliance program, it being understood that the Sub-Adviser’s obligation under Section 2(e) of this Agreement to vote all proxies solicited by or with respect to the issuers of securities in which the assets of the Portfolio may be invested shall be subject to the fulfillment of the condition that the Board approve the Sub-Adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures; (2) submit annually (and at such other times as the Trust may reasonably request) to the Fund’s CCO and the Adviser for consideration by the Board, a report discussing the adequacy and effectiveness of the Sub-Adviser’s compliance program, and fully describing any material amendments to such compliance program since the most recent such report; (3) provide periodic reports, certifications and information concerning the Sub-Adviser’s compliance program including, but not limited to, the following; (i) Quarterly Compliance Certifications, including any required attachments, no later than the tenth (10th) business day after each calendar quarter; and (ii) Annual Report on Code of Ethics Matters, including any required attachments, no later than the fifteenth (15th) business day of October each year. (4) provide the Adviser and the Trust and its Trustees and officers with reasonable access to information regarding the Sub-Adviser’s compliance program, which access shall include on-site visits with the Sub-Adviser as may be reasonably requested from time to time; (5) permit the Adviser and the Trust and its Trustees and officers to maintain an active working relationship with the Sub-Adviser’s compliance personnel by, among other things, providing the Adviser and the Fund’s CCO and other officers with a specified individual within the Sub-Adviser’s organization to discuss and address compliance-related matters; (6) provide the Adviser and its chief compliance officer and the Trust and its Trustees and officers, including the Fund’s CCO, with such certifications as may be reasonably requested; and (7) reasonably cooperate with any independent registered public accounting firm engaged by the Trust, ensure that all reasonably necessary information and the appropriate personnel are made available to such independent registered public accounting firm, to support the expression of the independent registered public accounting firm’s opinion, and each year provide the Adviser and such independent registered public accounting firm with a copy of the most recent SSAE 16 Report prepared by the Sub-Adviser’s independent auditors regarding the Sub-Adviser’s internal controls. (b) The Sub-Adviser represents, warrants and covenants that it has implemented and shall maintain a compliance program in accordance with the requirements of Rule 206(4)-7 under the Advisers Act.

  • Sanctions for Non-compliance In the event of the CONSULTANT’s non-compliance with the non-discrimination provisions of this AGREEMENT, the AGENCY shall impose such AGREEMENT sanctions as it, the STATE or the FHWA may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to: • Withholding of payments to the CONSULTANT under the AGREEMENT until the CONSULTANT complies, and/or; • Cancellation, termination, or suspension of the AGREEMENT, in whole or in part.

  • Information for Regulatory Compliance Each of the Company and the Depositary shall provide to the other, as promptly as practicable, information from its records or otherwise available to it that is reasonably requested by the other to permit the other to comply with applicable law or requirements of governmental or regulatory authorities.

  • Reporting of Compliance Matters (a) The Sub-Adviser shall promptly provide to the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) the following documents: (i) copies of all SEC examination correspondences, including correspondences regarding books and records examinations and “sweep” examinations, issued during the term of this Agreement, in which the SEC identified any concerns, issues or matters (such correspondences are commonly referred to as “deficiency letters”) relating to any aspect of the Sub-Adviser’s investment advisory business and the Sub-Adviser’s responses thereto; (ii) a report of any material violations of the Sub-Adviser’s Compliance Program or any “material compliance matters” (as such term is defined in Rule 38a-1 under the 0000 Xxx) that have occurred with respect to the Sub-Adviser’s Compliance Program; (iii) a report of any material changes to the policies and procedures that compose the Sub-Adviser’s Compliance Program; (iv) a copy of the Sub-Adviser’s chief compliance officer’s report (or similar document(s) which serve the same purpose) regarding his or her annual review of the Sub-Adviser’s Compliance Program, as required by Rule 206(4)-7 under the Advisers Act; and (v) an annual (or more frequently as the Trust’s CCO may reasonably request) representation regarding the Sub-Adviser’s compliance with Paragraphs 7 and 8 of this Agreement. (b) The Sub-Adviser shall also provide the Trust’s CCO with: (i) reasonable access to the testing, analyses, reports and other documentation, or summaries thereof, that the Sub-Adviser’s chief compliance officer relies upon to monitor the effectiveness of the implementation of the Sub-Adviser’s Compliance Program; and (ii) reasonable access, during normal business hours, to the Sub-Adviser’s facilities for the purpose of conducting pre-arranged on-site compliance related due diligence meetings with personnel of the Sub-Adviser.

  • Sanctions for Noncompliance In the event of a contractor’s noncompliance with the Non- discrimination provisions of this contract, the sponsor will impose such contract sanctions as it or the Federal Aviation Administration may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to: a. Withholding payments to the contractor under the contract until the contractor complies; and/or b. Cancelling, terminating, or suspending a contract, in whole or in part.

  • Customer Complaints Each party hereby agrees to promptly provide to the other party copies of any written or otherwise documented complaints from customers of Dealer received by such party relating in any way to the Offering (including, but not limited to, the manner in which the Shares are offered by the Dealer Manager or Dealer), the Shares or the Company.

  • MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEETS As applicable, Contractor shall provide Purchaser with all appropriate Material Safety Data Sheets (“MSDS”) at the time of delivery of each shipment of Goods which requires such compliance and/or and for materials used by Contractor while performing Services and any updates of the same.

  • Material Safety Data Sheet Seller shall provide to Buyer with each delivery any Material Safety Data Sheet applicable to the work in conformance with and containing such information as required by the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 and regulations promulgated thereunder or its State approved counterpart.

  • Notice of Complaints Each Seller shall promptly notify the applicable Purchaser upon becoming aware of any complaint concerning any Serviced Appointment made by any party to the Serviced Corporate Trust Contracts, any Securityholder, any Credit Enhancement Provider or any rating agency.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!