PROJECT COMPLETION REVIEW Sample Clauses

PROJECT COMPLETION REVIEW. 18.1. The Grant Recipient will submit a project completion report (using the template provided by the Authority in Annex X) within 4 weeks of the completion of the Funded Activities providing a final assessment of the extent to which the activities achieved their objectives (“the Project Completion Report”).
Sample 1Sample 2See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
PROJECT COMPLETION REVIEW. 30. At the end of the programme, MTC and DFID Burma will undertake a joint Project Completion Review PCR process to confirm the results achieved, Value for Money, success of the programme in delivering outputs, lessons learnt and challenges encountered. However, Crown Agents will provide logistical support and information disclosure to the PCR process including full support to any consultant and/or auditor that might be employed directly by DFID to undertake the PCR as part of the joint review team. Media and Communications
Sample 1
PROJECT COMPLETION REVIEW. The project manager will review the project completion package and will authorize or reject the final reimbursement payment which will include all retained funds from previous requests. Rulemaking Authority 374.976(2) FS. Law Implemented 374.976(1) FS. History–New 12-17-90, Formerly 16T-2.009, Amended 3-21-01, 7-30-02, 3- 7-11, 1-27-14.
Sample 1
PROJECT COMPLETION REVIEW. At the end of the project, the POA and DFID-M will undertake a joint Project Completion Review (PCR) process to confirm the results achieved, Value for Money, success of the project in delivering outputs, lessons learnt and challenges encountered. This PCR will include a final financial report. This will be carried out in consultation with GoM-MoH. The timing for the PCR process on DFID’s Activities Reporting Information Electronic System (ARIES) will begin within three months of the project’s end date. The PCR will be done in accordance with DFID’s PCR procedures and using DFID’s PCR templates. Media and communication The POA will be responsible for answering any media questions related to the management of the funds. He/she will consult with DFID-M and other relevant parties as appropriate. Whenever appropriate the POA will acknowledge that DFID-M is providing the funding for this project and will work with DFID-M and other key stakeholders when necessary to publicize the project.
Sample 1

Related to PROJECT COMPLETION REVIEW

  • Project Completion Report At the completion of construction and once a Project is placed in service, the Subrecipient must submit a Project Completion Report that includes the total number of units built and leased, affordable units built and leased, DR-MHP units built and leased, an accomplishment narrative, and the tenants names, demographics and income for each DR-MHP unit.

  • Project Completion Part 1 – Material Completion

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

  • Project Completion Date It is agreed between the Parties that the Project Completion Date is <END DATE, YEAR>. If the Project is not completed by such date then, subject to an amendment agreed to between the Parties, Alberta Innovates may elect to terminate this Investment Agreement. In such event, Alberta Innovates will notify the Applicant of its decision to terminate as soon as reasonably practical and shall advise the Applicant of the effective date of termination. Alberta Innovates will have no liability or obligation to reimburse the Applicant for any Project Costs incurred after the effective date of termination and may require the Applicant to return any portions of the Investment which were spent on Ineligible Expenses. Additionally, any portion of the Investment not used and accounted for in accordance with this Agreement as of the Project Completion Date or earlier termination is repayable by the Applicant to AI at AI’s request.

  • Contract Completion The Contractor shall achieve Contract Completion, as the term is defined in this Agreement, within 60 calendar days of Substantial Completion.

  • Design Review At appropriate stages of design, documented reviews of the design results shall be planned and conducted. Participants at each Design Review shall include representatives of all functions concerned with the design stage being reviewed, as well as other specialist personnel, as required. Records of such reviews shall be maintained. Any computer software used to perform alternative calculations or verify clearances through the use of scale models or computer-aided design and drafting (CADD) techniques shall be validated before the use of the application, with validation documented in accordance with Section 2.2.15. In addition, at each submittal to IFA for review, Developer shall provide hand calculations that validate any calculations performed by computer software.

  • Project Reports; Completion Report 1. The Recipient shall monitor and evaluate the progress of the Project and prepare Project Reports in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.06 of the Standard Conditions and on the basis of indicators agreed with the World Bank. Each Project Report shall cover the period of one (1) calendar semester, and shall be furnished to the World Bank not later than one (1) month after the end of the period covered by such report.

  • Project Closeout a. Participate in final inspection to prepare punch lists for project contractor to correct and/or to complete listed items. Verify that items on punch lists have been completed successfully assist COUNTY Project Manager or designee to determine completion date and coordinate project close out.

  • Validation Review In the event OIG has reason to believe that: (a) Good Shepherd’s Claims Review fails to conform to the requirements of this CIA; or (b) the IRO’s findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate, OIG may, at its sole discretion, conduct its own review to determine whether the Claims Review complied with the requirements of the CIA and/or the findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate (Validation Review). Good Shepherd shall pay for the reasonable cost of any such review performed by OIG or any of its designated agents. Any Validation Review of Reports submitted as part of Good Shepherd’s final Annual Report shall be initiated no later than one year after Good Shepherd’s final submission (as described in Section II) is received by OIG. Prior to initiating a Validation Review, OIG shall notify Good Shepherd of its intent to do so and provide a written explanation of why OIG believes such a review is necessary. To resolve any concerns raised by OIG, Good Shepherd may request a meeting with OIG to: (a) discuss the results of any Claims Review submissions or findings; (b) present any additional information to clarify the results of the Claims Review or to correct the inaccuracy of the Claims Review; and/or (c) propose alternatives to the proposed Validation Review. Good Shepherd agrees to provide any additional information as may be requested by OIG under this Section III.D.3 in an expedited manner. OIG will attempt in good faith to resolve any Claims Review issues with Good Shepherd prior to conducting a Validation Review. However, the final determination as to whether or not to proceed with a Validation Review shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG.

  • Construction Completion The related Construction shall have been completed substantially in accordance with the related Plans and Specifications, the related Deed and all Applicable Laws, and such Leased Property shall be ready for occupancy and operation. All fixtures, equipment and other property contemplated under the Plans and Specifications to be incorporated into or installed in such Leased Property shall have been substantially incorporated or installed, free and clear of all Liens except for Permitted Liens.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.