Results achieved Clause Samples

The "Results achieved" clause defines the expectations and standards for the outcomes or deliverables that a party must provide under an agreement. It typically specifies the criteria by which the success or completion of work will be measured, such as meeting certain performance benchmarks, achieving specified goals, or delivering agreed-upon results. For example, in a service contract, this clause might require the service provider to reach particular milestones or quality levels. Its core practical function is to ensure both parties have a clear understanding of what constitutes satisfactory performance, thereby reducing disputes over whether contractual obligations have been met.
Results achieved. Please report the results achieved against the expected results (as stated above) within the context of your project objectives (as stated above).
Results achieved. The project achieved the following results: Client contact information: Description: The Arlington Public Library was awarded a National Leadership Grant from the federal Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) for fiscal year 2013. The purpose of the planning grant was to conduct an assessment of the community’s capacity to promote early learning and school readiness and develop a coherent system of early care and education that encourages and enables parents, families, and caregivers to help their children learn. Period of performance: February 2013 through October 2013. Key project staff: ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Results achieved: The strategic plan included the following components: Client contact information: Description: The Texas State Library and Archives Commission (TSLAC) receives Library Services and Technology Act (LSTA) funding from the federal Institute of Museum and Library Sciences (IMLS) through the Grants to States program. As part of the IMLS funding requirements, state library organizations are required to evaluate program performance every five years. Duties performed: Morningside was hired to conduct an independent evaluation. The purpose of the evaluation was to determine whether Texas accomplished the priorities and goals outlined in the LSTA Five‐Year Plan for Texas, 2008‐2012. In addition, the evaluation measured how effectively each program was functioning and was perceived by the libraries and library system coordinators utilizing the programs. Evaluation activities included: Results achieved: Morningside determined that nearly all of the 72 LSTA targets were met or exceeded. Thirteen targets were partially met and one target was not met. Four targets could not be measured because data were unavailable. Performance metrics had greatly improved since the last evaluation in 2007 and almost all of the current outputs and outcomes were measurable and quantifiable. Despite the improvements, challenges were encountered when analyzing the performance reports, and surveys and interviews indicated that performance measures can continue to be improved. The report provided specific recommendations for improvement. Client contact information: Description: Workforce Solutions ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇), the local workforce development board in Cameron County, Texas, contracted with Morningside to assist with the identification of gaps and overlaps in child care services and resources available to children with special needs and to devel...
Results achieved. The main output of the reporting period was:  A set of specifications on Pylon mock-up, sensor array configuration. Definition of Data Acquisition System (DAS) and translator software (s/w) specifications.  Definition of mock-up test plan (test matrix, loading conditions, hardware)  The first initial detailed numerical model has been produced and analysed.  The inverse problem solution has been formulated  A set of specifications on Pylon mock-up, sensor array configuration. Definition of Data Acquisition System (DAS) and translator software (s/w) specifications.  Definition of mock-up test plan (test matrix, loading conditions, hardware)  The first initial detailed numerical model has been produced and analysed.  The inverse problem solution has been formulated  Realisation of a Data Acquisition System (DAS) that can fuse information from optical (FBG) and electrical (Strain Gauge) sensors.  Finalisation of mock-up CAD design  Fabrication of the physical test article  Proposal for an adapted concept on suitable for aircraft environment  Execution of Test Matrix for Mock-up tests  Analysis and results of the lab tests. Delivery of Pylon hardware  Discuss of Scale up feasibility with the synthesis of the work and proposal of a way towards TRL6
Results achieved. The main output of the project were: • DESA Specifications, SACM Specifications, Test rig specifications and Test Plan Specifications according to the requirements set • 3D CAD model of DESA architecture, FEA analysis and manufacturing drawings. • Design, FEA analysis and manufacturing drawings for the fabrication of appropriate test rigs and interface for the testing of DESA and SACM prototypes • Manufacturing of DESA prototype and functionality tests. Training of SMA actuators. • Perform Mechanical Characterization tests on SACM and DESA prototypes • Improvements on actuation cycle shortening of the SMA wire actuators
Results achieved. Creation of a wide network of social-health care services (GO and NGO) for hard to reach groups of sex workers, Creation of region-wide capacity to implement HIV/STD prevention among migrant sex workers in Europe. Setting up of a international network structure and cooperation model among governmental and non-governmental organisations on regional, sub regional and national levels in order to: develop coherent, harmonized and effective coordination of policy and programmatic approaches in the area of HIV/AIDS prevention with migrant sex workers. Drawing of an updated assessment of situation in prostitution comprising migration movements within the prostitution industry in Europe and identification of barriers to access to services for migrant sex workers Formulating recommendations and advice to the national and international authorities concerning health, social and juridical policies.
Results achieved. Looking back on 20 years of European social dialogue at both cross- industry and sectoral level, the results achieved can be considered – at least from a quantitative point of view - as impressive, with more than 600 joint texts issued, ranging from framework agreements, joint work programmes, declarations, statements to such joint instruments as specific websites17. An overview of these joint texts can – alongside more general information on the European social dialogue - be found on a specific European Commission website including also a database where these joint texts can be consulted.18 Looking at signed European framework agreements, the cross-industry European social dialogue has up till now (September 2011) led to seven European framework agreements, three of which have been incorporated into a Directive: 15. One example of technical assistance is the readiness of the Commission to provide legal assistance during negotiations where appropriate in particular because consistency with European law and quality in legal drafting are particularly important for instance for agreements to be implemented by means of European Directives. 16. More information on this agreement is available on the dedicated website: ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇ 17. Reference is made here to the so-called ‘Resource centres’ operated by ETUC and the employer organisations where they – with a view to raising awareness on and disseminating the results of the European social dialogue – have posted an enormous amount of information accessible to the general public. See: ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ or ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/Content/Default.asp 18. ▇▇▇▇://▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/employment_social/social_dialogue/ — the European Framework Agreement on parental leave concluded by ▇▇▇▇▇, CEEP and ETUC on 14 December 1995 (transposed into Council Directive 96/34/EC of 3 June 1996); and of which a revised version was successfully negotiated and signed on 18 June 2009 by BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME, CEEP and ETUC (transposed into Council Directive 2010/18/EU of 8 March 2010) — the European Framework Agreement on part-time work concluded by ▇▇▇▇▇, CEEP and ETUC on 6 June 1997 (transposed into Council Directive 97/81/EC of 15 December 1997); — the European Framework Agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, ▇▇▇▇▇ and CEEP on 18 March 1999 (transposed into Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999). Four other European framework agreements emerging from this cross- industry social dialogue are so-called autonom...
Results achieved delivering the duties outlined herein and expected outcomes
Results achieved. The project intends to provide proof-of-concept for the following hypotheses: - The composition and structure of orebodies have certain advantages that could be used to our advantage when developing an Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS); - Metals can be leached from the orebodies in high concentrations over a prolonged period of time and may substantially influence the economics of EGS; - The continuous leaching of metals will increase system’s performance over time in a controlled way and without having to use high-pressure reservoir stimulation, minimizing potential detrimental impacts of both heat and metal extraction. As a final outcome, the project will deliver blueprints and detailed specifications of a new type of future facility that is designed and operated from the very beginning as a combined heat, power and metal extraction system. The horizontal aim is to provide new impetus to geothermal development in Europe by investigating previously unexplored pathways at low-Technology Readiness Levels. This will be achieved by developing a Roadmap in support of the pilot implementation of such system before 2030, and full-scale commercial implementation before 2050.
Results achieved. Impact Prospects and potential sustainability (to be presented in the completion report)

Related to Results achieved

  • Results Revvity Omics will return the results of the Sequencing Test to the Ordering Provider via secure e-mail.

  • Financial Statements; Material Adverse Change The consolidated balance sheet of such Borrower and its Subsidiaries, as at December 31, 2020, and the related consolidated statements of income, retained earnings and cash flows of such Borrower and its Subsidiaries, certified by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent public accountants, and the unaudited consolidated balance sheet of such Borrower and its Subsidiaries, as at June 30, 2021, and the related consolidated statements of income, retained earnings and cash flows of such Borrower and its Subsidiaries, for the six months then ended, copies of which have been furnished to each Lender and each Fronting Bank, in all cases as amended and restated to the date hereof, present fairly in all material respects the consolidated financial position of such Borrower and its Subsidiaries as at the indicated dates and the consolidated results of the operations of such Borrower and its Subsidiaries for the periods ended on the indicated dates, all in accordance with GAAP consistently applied (in the case of such statements that are unaudited, subject to year-end adjustments and the exclusion of detailed footnotes). Except as disclosed in the Disclosure Documents, there has been no change, event or occurrence since December 31, 2020 that has had a Material Adverse Effect with respect to such Borrower.

  • Financial Statements; No Material Adverse Effect; No Internal Control Event (a) The Audited Financial Statements (i) were prepared in accordance with GAAP consistently applied throughout the period covered thereby, except as otherwise expressly noted therein; (ii) fairly present the financial condition of Holdings and its Subsidiaries as of the date thereof and their results of operations for the period covered thereby in accordance with GAAP consistently applied throughout the period covered thereby, except as otherwise expressly noted therein; and (iii) show all material indebtedness and other liabilities, direct or contingent, of Holdings and its Subsidiaries as of the date thereof, including liabilities for taxes, material commitments and Indebtedness. (b) The unaudited consolidated balance sheet of Holdings and its Subsidiaries as at September 29, 2012, and the related consolidated statements of income or operations, and cash flows for the fiscal quarter ended on that date (i) were prepared in accordance with GAAP consistently applied throughout the period covered thereby, except as otherwise expressly noted therein, and (ii) fairly present the financial condition of Holdings and its Subsidiaries as of the date thereof and their results of operations for the period covered thereby, subject, in the case of clauses (i) and (ii), to the absence of footnotes and to normal quarter-end or year-end adjustments. (c) Since the date of the Audited Financial Statements, except as disclosed in Holdings’ public filings with the SEC made prior to the Closing Date, there has been no event or circumstance, either individually or in the aggregate, that has had or could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. (d) To the best knowledge of Holdings and the Borrower, no Internal Control Event exists or has occurred since the date of the Audited Financial Statements that has resulted in or could reasonably be expected to result in a misstatement in any material respect, in any financial information delivered or to be delivered to the Administrative Agent or the Lenders, of (i) covenant compliance calculations provided hereunder or (ii) the assets, liabilities, financial condition or results of operations of Holdings and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. (e) The consolidated forecasted balance sheets, statements of income and cash flows of Holdings and its Subsidiaries delivered by or on behalf of the Borrower to the Administrative Agent or the Lenders during the period prior to the Closing Date in connection with the syndication of the credit facilities evidenced by this Agreement were prepared in good faith on the basis of the assumptions stated therein, which assumptions were reasonable in light of the conditions existing at the time of delivery of such forecasts.

  • Financial Condition; No Adverse Change The Borrower has furnished to the Lender its audited financial statements for its fiscal year ended July 31, 2009 and unaudited financial statements for the fiscal-year-to-date period ended November 30, 2009 and those statements fairly present the Borrower’s financial condition on the dates thereof and the results of its operations and cash flows for the periods then ended and were prepared in accordance with GAAP. Since the date of the most recent financial statements, there has been no material adverse change in the Borrower’s business, properties or condition (financial or otherwise).

  • Financial Statements; No Material Adverse Change All financial statements relating to Borrower which have been or may hereafter be delivered by Borrower to Lender have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and fairly present the financial condition and the results of operation of Borrower as at the dates and for the periods set forth therein. Except as disclosed in any interim financial statements furnished by Borrower to Lender prior to the date of this Agreement, there has been no material adverse change in the assets, liabilities, properties and condition, financial or otherwise, of Borrower, since the date of the most recent audited financial statements furnished by Borrower to Lender prior to the date of this Agreement.