Proposed Targets for Q4 Sample Clauses

Proposed Targets for Q4. Once the LLIN mass distribution campaign was resumed, following the jointly defined plan (see item 1.4 above), activities in Huambo province started (mid-May), and expected to be completed by mid-July. HFA had to revise its targets, proposing to cover 100% of the provinces of Cuando Cubango and Moxico and partially covering Lunda Sul and Lunda Norte, until Sept 30th (distribution will end by mid-Nov/18 in these provinces passing to Q1 Y3). New targets for Cuando Cubango, Moxico, Lunda Norte and Lunda Sul, in Q4 are: • Distribution of 1,687,637 LLINs • Estimated population to be covered: 3,037,746 beneficiaries (75,336 pregnant women + 588,715 children <5 years-old) • 1,916 community health workers (HWs) (activists and field supervisors) to be trained in communication, registration, and distribution; • New Mass Distribution Toolkit completed and submitted for approval by the MOH by the end of Q4: the toolkit is in final stages of review by PSI and USAID before being translated to Portuguese, ready to be submitted to DNSP/NMCP for their input and final approval;
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Proposed Targets for Q4. In Q4, HFA will keep focusing on trainings and formative supervision: ⮚ Strengthen the technical capacity of malaria service providers at provincial and municipal level to appropriately diagnose and treat malaria (including MIP): HFA Result 2 – Training Targets for Q4 FY18 Province # of existing health facilities (HF) # of HW targeted for training* # of lab technicians targeted for training* Malanje 84 139 27 Lunda Norte 39 8 0 Lunda Sul 49 66 0 Cuanza Norte 57 79 18 Zaire 53 72 1 Uige 125 237 2 TOTAL 407 601 48 * Overall targets were calculated by subtracting achievements in Q1-Q3 from annual target by province. The program might readjust the proposed target based on cost-effectiveness of logistics: when values are very small in one province (1-10 HW to be trained, for example) it might be better to move those targets to another province. ⮚ Provide formative supervision to HU and service providers in all target municipalities of PMI provinces: HFA Result 2 – Formative Supervision Targets for Q4 FY18 Province # of existing health facilities (HF) # of HW trained in Malaria Case Management (ACT and RDT) to be supervised * # of Lab Technicians trained in lab diagnosis (microscopy) to be supervised ** Malanje 84 25 1 Lunda Norte 39 0 0 Lunda Sul 49 12 9 Cuanza Norte 57 5 0 Zaire 53 0 0 Uige 125 52 20 TOTAL 407 94 30 * Overall targets were calculated by substracting achievements in Q1-Q3 from annual target by province. The program might readjust the proposed target based on cost-effectiveness of logistics: when values are very small in one province (1-10 HW to be supervised, for example) it might be better to move those targets to another province. **Annual targets used to calculate Q4 targets were re-adjusted considering the number of of HW trained in Q1-Q3 and those expected to be trained in Q4. Since the basic conditions for implementing trainings and formative supervisions have been created, through training TOTs in “adult teaching skills” (CENFFOR) and updating and segregating supervision tools, the key activities to be implemented in the last quarter (Q4) will be to: o Provide the second phase of training on “adult teaching skills” to malaria TOTs (CENFFOR); o Implement the updated training and supervision plans for Q4; o Reinforce the training of OPMs, OPPMs, SPPMs and TOTs in management and use of database (e.g. insert data on trainings and supervisions in database); ⮚ Implementation of activities related to iCCM in 4 municipalities of Lunda Sul and Zai...
Sample 1

Related to Proposed Targets for Q4

  • Table 7b - Other milestones and targets Reference Number Select stage of the lifecycle Please select target type from the drop-down menu Description (500 characters maximum) Is this a collaborative target? Baseline year Baseline data Yearly milestones (numeric where possible, however you may use text) Commentary on your milestones/targets or textual description where numerical description is not appropriate (500 characters maximum)

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • Sole Source as Grounds for Rejection of a Change Order If a Change Order is submitted to Contractor for the purposes of adding a Bulletin to this Contract and said Bulletin designates a Sole Source from which Contractor is required to procure goods or services necessary to perform the Work, which Sole Source has not been designated previously, Contractor shall be entitled to reject the proposed Change Order if the designated Sole Source refuses to provide to Contractor the warranties, bonds, terms or schedule required under the Contract Documents, including any warranty or terms or schedule required by Bulletins referenced in the proposed Change Order. In such event, Contractor shall give written notice to the Owner rejecting the proposed Change Order and, if possible, shall accompany said written notice with a proposal from Contractor for changes or modifications to the Bulletin so as to eliminate the Sole Source designation but to achieve goods or services equal in quality or function. The Owner may then require the Design Professional to revise the subject Bulletin so as to eliminate the designation of the Sole Source by incorporation of Contractor's proposal or otherwise. Upon revision of the Bulletin by the Design Professional and approval thereof by the Owner, the Owner shall again submit to the Contractor a proposed Change Order for the purpose of adding the revised Bulletin to this Contract. If the Owner decides to retain the Sole Source in the Change Order and Contractor cannot acquire the full contractually required warranties from the Sole Source, Contractor shall be held only to the warranty terms and schedule obtainable from the Sole Source.

  • Project Specific Milestones In addition to the milestones stated in Section 212.5 of the Tariff, as applicable, during the term of this ISA, Interconnection Customer shall ensure that it meets each of the following development milestones:

  • Loop Provisioning Involving IDLC 2.16.1 Where TWTC has requested an Unbundled Loop and AT&T uses IDLC systems to provide the local service to the customer and AT&T has a suitable alternate facility available, AT&T will make such alternative facilities available to TWTC. If a suitable alternative facility is not available, then to the extent it is technically feasible, AT&T will implement one of the following alternative arrangements for TWTC (e.g., hairpinning):

  • Promotional Criteria Subject to the utilisation of the skills, as required by the Employer, an employee remains at this level until he/she has developed the skills to allow the employee to effectively perform the tasks required of this function and is assessed to be competent to perform effectively at a higher level or has successfully completed appropriate training to ASF level 1 and has the demonstrated skills to perform at a higher level. An employee must be prepared to undertake appropriate training. LEVEL 3

  • Performance indicators and targets The purpose of the innovation performance indicators and targets is to assist the University and the Commonwealth in monitoring the University's progress against the Commonwealth's objectives and the University's strategies for innovation. The University will report principal performance information and aim to meet the innovation performance indicators and targets set out in the following tables.

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Desirable Selection Criteria 1. Possession of, or significant progression toward the attainment of a post graduate qualification in area of specialty.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.