Summary of Major Achievements in Q3 Sample Clauses

Summary of Major Achievements in Q3. During Q3 of FY18, MSH continued working in close collaboration with its key stakeholders, including the National Institute to Fight HIV/AIDS in Angola (INLS). Other stakeholders include the Cabinet of Provincial Health of Luanda (GPSL), the National Program of TB Control (PNCT), the African Field Epidemiology Network (AFENET), the National Institute of Public Health (INSP) and the Procurement Supply Management (PSM). During Q3, in cooperation with these partners, MSH was able to accomplish the following: • Assumed full responsibility for M&E, including data collection and analysis within the seven Health Facilities (HFs) located in the province of Luanda; • Continued improving in the collection and analysis of data across the seven HFs through daily supervision, after MSH assumed management responsibility for M&E staff from PSI (eight data clerks and one coordinator); the senior M&E advisor is now in charge of the staff and data quality control; • Patient Assistant Facilitators (PAFs) under HFA continued with weekly supervisory visits and close follow-up in the different services at the HFs, which led to improved efficiency whereby HFA contributed to the reduction in the wait time between testing, getting the result and counseling to no more than one hour; • Improved the control of stock management at the facility level and strengthened collaboration with the supply chain project (PSM/MSH monthly meeting) through permanent supervision and reporting, which included concise but comprehensive information; • Shortened the transition period of patients from pre-antiretroviral treatment (pre-ART) to ART, through monitoring and linkage to treatment; • Continued to improve patient retention and adherence to treatment through PAF support and personal follow-up with the patients and worked with PAFs to create a new tool (Defaulters Form) that collects these data; • Created a new tool to collect data on HIV positive patient follow-up to know the causes of lost to follow-up (LTFU), increase the number of patients on ART and improve adherence; • The Dispensario Anti-TB health facility stopped implementing the One-Stop Shop strategy and started focusing exclusively on specific services for HIV/TB co-infected patients every tuesday and friday; • Ensured adherence to norms and protocols for quality improvement developed by MINSA and INLS, through the CMs and PAFs doing quality improvement activities; • Provided technical assistance and training to carry out quality impro...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Summary of Major Achievements in Q3

  • Table 7b - Other milestones and targets Reference Number Select stage of the lifecycle Please select target type from the drop-down menu Description (500 characters maximum) Is this a collaborative target? Baseline year Baseline data Yearly milestones (numeric where possible, however you may use text) Commentary on your milestones/targets or textual description where numerical description is not appropriate (500 characters maximum)

  • Performance indicators and targets The purpose of the innovation performance indicators and targets is to assist the University and the Commonwealth in monitoring the University's progress against the Commonwealth's objectives and the University's strategies for innovation. The University will report principal performance information and aim to meet the innovation performance indicators and targets set out in the following tables.

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit H), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS Upon a particular Commission’s issuance of an Order pertaining to Performance Measurements in a proceeding expressly applicable to all CLECs generally, BellSouth shall implement in that state such Performance Measurements as of the date specified by the Commission. Performance Measurements that have been Ordered in a particular state can currently be accessed via the internet at xxxx://xxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx. The following Service Quality Measurements (SQM) plan as it presently exists and as it may be modified in the future, is being included as the performance measurements currently in place for the state of Tennessee. At such time that the TRA issues a subsequent Order pertaining to Performance Measurements, such Performance Measurements shall supersede the SQM contained in the Agreement. BellSouth Service Quality Measurement Plan‌ (SQM) Tennessee Performance Metrics Measurement Descriptions Version 2.00 Issue Date: July 1, 2003 Introduction

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

  • Multi-year Planning Targets Schedule A may reflect an allocation for the first Funding Year of this Agreement as well as planning targets for up to two additional years, consistent with the term of this Agreement. In such an event, the HSP acknowledges that if it is provided with planning targets, these targets:

  • PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES 4.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) sets out-

  • Performance Indicators The HSP’s delivery of the Services will be measured by the following Indicators, Targets and where applicable Performance Standards. In the following table: n/a meanç ‘not-appIicabIe’, that there iç no defined Performance Standard for the indicator for the applicable year. tbd means a Target, and a Performance Standard, if applicable, will be determined during the applicable year. INDICATOR CATEGORY INDICATOR P = Performance Indicator E = Explanatory Indicator M = Monitoring Indicator 2019/20 PERFORMANCE TARGET STANDARD Organizational Health and Financial Indicators Debt Service Coverage Ratio (P) 1 c1 Total Margin (P) 0 cO Coordination and Access Indicators Percent Resident Days – Long Stay (E) n/a n/a Wait Time from LHIN Determination of Eligibility to LTC Home Response (M) n/a n/a Long-Term Care Home Refusal Rate (E) n/a n/a SCHEDULE D — PERFORMANCE 2/3 INDICATOR CATEGORY Quality and Resident Safety Indicators INDICATOR P = Performance Indicator E = Explanatory Indicator M = Monitoring Indicator Percentage of Residents Who Fell in the Last 30 days (M) 2019/20 PERFORMANCE TARGET STANDARD n/a n/a Percentage of Residents Whose Pressure Ulcer Worsened (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents on Antipsychotics Without a Diagnosis of Psychosis (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents in Daily Physical Restraints (M) n/a n/a SCHEDULE D — PERFORMANCE 2.0 LHIN-Specific Performance Obligations 3/3

  • Annual Performance Review The Employee’s performance of his duties under this Agreement shall be reviewed by the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors at least annually and finalized within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the annual audited financial statements. The Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors shall additionally review the base salary, bonus and benefits provided to the Employee under this Agreement and may, in their discretion, adjust the same, as outlined in Addendum B of this Agreement, provided, however, that Employee’s annual base salary shall not be less than the base salary set forth in Section 4(A) hereof.

  • Specific Objectives In accordance with Articles 34 and 35 of the Cotonou Agreement, the specific objectives of this Agreement are to:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.