Readers. In-class readers: • Will only read what is on the needed document. • May be asked to re-read parts of a document and state the punctuation. • May be asked to adjust speed and volume.
Readers. The readings were performed by 8 certified staff radiologists, fel- lowship-trained and specialized in neuroradiology with clinical experience ranging from 1 to 37 years (mean, 17.9 ± 7.3 years; median, 17 years). They worked independently, rotating each day within the same tertiary institution. They were aware that a study was ongoing but could not guess which patients were included (<1% of the patients being examined were part of the study).
Readers. There will be two (2) professional staff members (Readers) appointed by the President or his or her designee from a list of four (4) professional staff members (unit or non-unit) suggested by the applicant on the basis of relevant expertise. The Readers shall provide the Committee with their evaluation of an applicant's proposal.
Readers. There will be two (2) Readers, in or out of the unit, selected by the professional staff member being assessed on the basis of relevant expertise. The Readers will provide the PSAC with their views on appropriate developmental activities.
Readers. A reader is a person provided to assist a learner with a disability by reading assessment questions aloud without suggesting the answer. A reader is a person who, on request, will read to the learner:
Readers. Clause 2.5.
Readers. Although the instructor has the final responsibility for determining a student’s grade, readers may be used by faculty members to help with written assignments, and with midterm or final examinations. It is the responsibility of both the instructor and Xxxx to determine that readers are adequately qualified for their assignments. An instructor requesting a reader should make clear on his or her application the number of students enrolled in class, and the number and length of written assignments to be demanded. The number of reader hours assigned will be determined by the Xxxx.
Readers. Appleton shall have the right to place one or more purchase orders to Spectra for the Readers specified in Exhibit C to this Agreement, and Spectra shall be obligated to provide such Readers (with accompanying Reader Operating Software where necessary) to Appleton, up to the maximum quantities set forth on Exhibit X. Xxxxxxxx agrees to purchase its supply needs of Readers solely from Spectra. Spectra shall use reasonable commercial efforts to fulfill purchase orders for quantities exceeding the maximum quantities set forth on Exhibit C. Upon receipt of such purchase order, Spectra shall manufacture Readers and shall supply said Readers to Appleton, under the following terms:
(1) The specification sheet attached hereto as Exhibit C may be amended from time to time upon mutual agreement of the parties or for a given order as the parties may specify upon mutual agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as precluding Spectra from developing new, improved, or alternative forms of Readers or Reader Operating Software, nor Appleton from purchasing any such new, improved, or alternative forms of Readers or Reader Operating Software from Spectra. The price for such new, improved, or alternate forms of Readers or Reader Operating Software will be negotiated in good faith by Appleton and Spectra, provided that Spectra shall remain obligated to provide Readers and Reader Operating Software which conforms with the specification sheet attached hereto as Exhibit C, unless Appleton shall agree otherwise in writing.
(2) Beginning on the date of execution of this Agreement, and continuing for [***] thereafter, the price of the Readers shall be no more than [***]. After the first [***] and up to and including [***] Readers, the price of the Readers shall be no more than [***]. These prices shall include any necessary Reader Operating Software. [*] = Information redacted pursuant to a confidential treatment request. An unredacted version of this exhibit has been filed separately with the Commission.
(A) Beginning on the date of execution of this Agreement, and continuing for [***] thereafter, the price of the "Pocket-Eye" Readers shall be [***]. After the first [***]. These prices shall include any necessary "Pocket-Eye" Reader Operating Software. For purposes of this agreement, purchases of "Pocket-Eye" Readers by Appleton shall count toward Appleton's purchase obligations of Readers.
Readers. The discount to VAR is [**] off the then current list price up to [**] readers. For quantities greater than [**], the Gemplus Account manager must be contacted to authorize discounts.
Readers. Table 1 provides the assessment results for Group 1 readers. In Phase 1, (i.e., without the benefit of photographs), only one reader correctly reported the presence of mismatched radiographs. In Phase 2, i.e., when photographs were provided but readers were not made aware of the purpose of photographs, 5 of the same readers correctly reported the presence of all mismatched radiographs; an additional 3 readers reported the presence of some mismatched pairs. One reader later mentioned that he was actively ignoring the photographs because he thought the intent of their use was to distract readers from providing a proper radiologic assessment. Despite this belief, the reader did note the last mismatch as he was finishing the study. Two readers reported that they used the photographs to confirm the presence or absence of intravenous lines and tubes, but did not compare the two photographs to see if they were from the same patient. Overall, there was a significant difference in the mismatch detection rates without and with photographs (P = 0.0003) in the first group of readers who were not informed of the purpose of the presence of photographs. In the absence of photographs, only 3 of 24 (12.5%) mismatched pairs were reported; with photographs detection rate improved to 16 of 25 (64%) mismatched pairs. Table 3, shows the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for detection of mismatched pairs with and without photographs: we note an increase in accuracy from 78% to 91%. The mean (standard deviation) time for interpretation without photographs was 35.73 (8.84) minutes and with photographs was 26.51 (11.65) minutes, with mean difference being 9.23 (95% CI: -2.66 to 21.12) minutes (unpaired t-test, two-tailed P = 0.1178), which was not statistically significant.
